F
FaithBuild18
Guest
Even if they do not stop their immoral ways?
For example, if a person is addicted to something immoral or evil, will they receive any mercy for admitting that what they do is immoral or evil, even if they persist in their addiction? Compared to if they were to entirely deny or rationalize away the wrongness of their actions? (and assuming in both situations the individual persists in the immoral action)
It seems to me that it’s significant for one to say “Look, Lord, I know what I’m doing is wrong,” than if they were to rationalize and deny the wrongness in what they do. This is assuming of course, that in both situations the individual actually does indeed know what they do is wrong, but the difference is that in one situation the individual admits it, while in the other he denies it. Will there be any difference in judgement for the two situations? Or will they receive equal punishment for not stopping the immoral action?
Perhaps my impression is fueled by my frustration over moral relativity that runs rampant in the post-modern era. I’m always inspired when I see people admit true evil, acknowledging God’s natural moral law, when the more popular option seems to be to rationalize it away as simply being “different,” not immoral.
For example, if a person is addicted to something immoral or evil, will they receive any mercy for admitting that what they do is immoral or evil, even if they persist in their addiction? Compared to if they were to entirely deny or rationalize away the wrongness of their actions? (and assuming in both situations the individual persists in the immoral action)
It seems to me that it’s significant for one to say “Look, Lord, I know what I’m doing is wrong,” than if they were to rationalize and deny the wrongness in what they do. This is assuming of course, that in both situations the individual actually does indeed know what they do is wrong, but the difference is that in one situation the individual admits it, while in the other he denies it. Will there be any difference in judgement for the two situations? Or will they receive equal punishment for not stopping the immoral action?
Perhaps my impression is fueled by my frustration over moral relativity that runs rampant in the post-modern era. I’m always inspired when I see people admit true evil, acknowledging God’s natural moral law, when the more popular option seems to be to rationalize it away as simply being “different,” not immoral.