Is anyone not Catholic for Theological Reasons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StMarina303ad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
can you please tell me where in the scripture is december 25? :confused:
No one said it was. TriunUnity said the stories were in Scripture, not the date. Picking a date to celebrate something has no real theological significance. Even with Easter, wouldn’t it technically be more accurate to do it the same week as Passover every year?
 
I am still Catholic, but in name only. I have distanced myself from the CC for theological reasons, mainly discrepencies about Mary and the ever-popular birth control.
 
Since there was a question already on the forum if there was anyone who was not Catholic for Non-Theological reasons, I thought that perhaps some would want to share if they are not Catholic for Theological reasons.
I think there are two major theological reasons why most Protestants are not Roman Catholic. The first is the issue of authority. Sola Scriptura over the Roman Catholic Magestrium defines the rest of Christian theology. The second major theological issue is the gospel itself. The Roman Catholic gospel is a different gospel than what the Protestant Reformers proclaimed. Within the gospel, the doctrine of justification is the heart of the dispute, causing two versions of the gospel. To illustrate my point, please share your understanding of the gospel of God’s grace. What must I do to be saved from the wrath of God and coming day of judgment?
 
I think there are two major theological reasons why most Protestants are not Roman Catholic. The first is the issue of authority. Sola Scriptura over the Roman Catholic Magestrium defines the rest of Christian theology. The second major theological issue is the gospel itself. The Roman Catholic gospel is a different gospel than what the Protestant Reformers proclaimed. Within the gospel, the doctrine of justification is the heart of the dispute, causing two versions of the gospel. To illustrate my point, please share your understanding of the gospel of God’s grace. What must I do to be saved from the wrath of God and coming day of judgment?
Faith is a gift from God. Because of our faith we receive the gift of grace from God. Faith is like an instrument. If we do not use it, do we still receive grace? If on the other hand, we use it well we receive an abundance of God’s grace. I know this is where Protestants and Catholics usually divide when the discussion includes a works argument, but let’s replace the word works with “our response to God”. God requires our full response, 24/7. That is to live our Christianity ALL the time and not just an hour or so on Sundays.

Since you brought up the subject of authority; Bible vs. Church, would you please explain your position on how the Bible came to be one complete book from the individual letters and epistles that were written by the Apostles 30 years and more after the death and resurrection of Christ?
 
As a person in RCIA I find it interesting that our folks here do not use the Catechism of the Catholic Church more. I mean, it has answers to just about everything Catholic.

I ask… Are we (Catholic believers) any different from our Protestant brothers when we attempt to interrupt doctrine without the guidance of the Church? Shouldn’t this forum be simply referring to the Catechism?

Need an answer on Assumption, go to paragraph such and such…

Of course, it’s not as fun and frankly doesn’t stroke our egos quite as much as we MUST refer to someone else for answers rather than ourselves.

I’ve seen in these forums from Catholic believers who have different views on the very important topic of Justification… Well, what does the Church teach on it? No offense to anyone here, but frankly, removing any Apostolic Succession belief (which I do believe in), those folks are MUCH smarter than pretty much anyone here… They have had years to figure this out, debate, and most importantly pray for guidance from the Holy Spirit.

Finally, are the Protestants who troll these forums going to change their mind? Has anyone been converted to Catholicism from these types of forums? Is this really fruitful?

teak
 
What must I do to be saved from the wrath of God and coming day of judgment?
There is no “wrath of God” waiting to pounce on anyone.
God is Love by Nature and is unchangable.

We, the human race, have rejected God by missing the mark (sinning). Although created in His Image and Likeness we have failed to grow in His Likeness as He intended for us because as the book of Genesis explains, - our forefather & foremother attempt to become Like God without God and thus sin entered the creation. The plan of salvation, simply saves us from ourselves, so we can live the life which God intended for us.

The Orthodox View of Salvation is so much greater than the understanding of Catholics or Protestants. I fear I would do a terrible job at attempting to explain it, so I will have to defer you to an author: Clark Carlton - his books are easy to read and readily available. I suggest two of his books: The Life as well as The Way. Regina Orthodox Press and also Conciliar Press are two places you can obtain them.
 
There is no “wrath of God” waiting to pounce on anyone.
God is Love by Nature and is unchangable.

We, the human race, have rejected God by missing the mark (sinning). Although created in His Image and Likeness we have failed to grow in His Likeness as He intended for us because as the book of Genesis explains, - our forefather & foremother attempt to become Like God without God and thus sin entered the creation. The plan of salvation, simply saves us from ourselves, so we can live the life which God intended for us.

The Orthodox View of Salvation is so much greater than the understanding of Catholics or Protestants. I fear I would do a terrible job at attempting to explain it, so I will have to defer you to an author: Clark Carlton - his books are easy to read and readily available. I suggest two of his books: The Life as well as The Way. Regina Orthodox Press and also Conciliar Press are two places you can obtain them.
I’m sorry, but the wrath of God is a biblical doctrine. What do you think God saves you from?

Romans 1:16-18

For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith, as it is written, “The righteous shall live by faith.” For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth.

The Judgment at Christ’s Coming

This is evidence of the righteous judgment of God, that you may be considered worthy of the kingdom of God, for which you are also suffering— since indeed God considers it just to repay with affliction those who afflict you, and to grant relief to you who are afflicted as well as to us, when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with his mighty angels in flaming fire, inflicting vengeance on those who do not know God and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. They will suffer the punishment of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might, when he comes on that day to be glorified in his saints, and to be marveled at among all who have believed, because our testimony to you was believed. To this end we always pray for you, that our God may make you worthy of his calling and may fulfill every resolve for good and every work of faith by his power, so that the name of our Lord Jesus may be glorified in you, and you in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ. 2 Thes 1
 
Please read some of my posts on here as I addressed all but the issue of The Perpetual Virginity of Mary…why would you not believe that?

Mary’s parents gave her back to God as a gift once she was weaned at 3 years old as they had promised God when in their old age God blessed then with a child. She lived in the Temple and had offered her Virginity to God as a gift long before she was betrothed to Joseph.

Mary was betrothed to Joseph at such a young age because women who had menses are not allowed in live in the Temple (Anna who lived at the Temple when Jesus was born had already gone through menapose - can’t spell).

The Orthodox Church still maintains the two parts to a marriage - the exchanging of the rings (this is the only part of the marriage ceremony celebrated in Catholic & Protestant Churches today) and then the Crowning. One is betrothed (which is not like an engagement today) once the exchanging of rings takes place - they are then married and can live together or not before the Coronation after which the couple would consemate the marriage. This is why people are "re"married in the Orthodox Church when they convert to Orthodoxy.

The New Testatment clearly states that Mary and Joseph were Betrothed and never once implies that Mary and Joseph ever Coronated.

When the ArchAngel Gabriel appeared to Mary and told her she would be with child, she asked, “How could this be?” If she was planning on becoming married rather than maintaining her virginity vows than the idea of her ever getting pregnant would not have been confusing for her and she would not have asked, “How could this be?”

Oral Tradition tells us that Joseph, Mary’s betrothed, was a widowed elder and already had several children from his previous wife - who are named in the Bible as Jesus brothers as they were his brothers from his earthly “foster” or “step” father.

Jesus didn’t leave his mother to them as it was not their responsiblity to care for her as she wasn’t their mother and he gave her into St. John’s care as he was dying on the cross.
I also originally left the catholic church for theological reasons, and subsequent studies have proven to me that the Orthodox church is much closer to the original doctrines found in early christianity.

I am especially interested in your notion of theosis – so you believe that saints are those who are deified? I find this fascinating.

Also the two stage marriage- I find the coronation very interesting. Is there any connection between the coronation and theosis?

Also the tradition about Peter being married vs Paul being celibate. Paul seems to be advocating celibacy, but you have a tradition that says that Peter was married? Was there a controversy between the two about marriage?
 
I was raised Protestant and converted to RC as an adult; however, I never really agreed with some teachings, such as infallibility and the birth control thing. The more I learned about both and the more I learned about the origins of scriptures, however, the less I believed in any form of Christianity. The study of Bible origins played a big role in my decision to leave Christianity. I have the same problem with the “revealed” religions that the Deists do. This process involved study, reason and personal experience and observation (especially my experience as a person with bipolar disorder). I simply do not believe in the “one” GOD anymore. I am investigating natural religions, including Buddhism and other polytheistic systems. I am also very interested in Navajo and other Native American spiritulaities. 🤷
 
Please read some of my posts on here as I addressed all but the issue of The Perpetual Virginity of Mary…why would you not believe that?

Mary’s parents gave her back to God as a gift once she was weaned at 3 years old as they had promised God when in their old age God blessed then with a child. She lived in the Temple and had offered her Virginity to God as a gift long before she was betrothed to Joseph.

Mary was betrothed to Joseph at such a young age because women who had menses are not allowed in live in the Temple (Anna who lived at the Temple when Jesus was born had already gone through menapose - can’t spell).

The Orthodox Church still maintains the two parts to a marriage - the exchanging of the rings (this is the only part of the marriage ceremony celebrated in Catholic & Protestant Churches today) and then the Crowning. One is betrothed (which is not like an engagement today) once the exchanging of rings takes place - they are then married and can live together or not before the Coronation after which the couple would consemate the marriage. This is why people are "re"married in the Orthodox Church when they convert to Orthodoxy.

The New Testatment clearly states that Mary and Joseph were Betrothed and never once implies that Mary and Joseph ever Coronated.

When the ArchAngel Gabriel appeared to Mary and told her she would be with child, she asked, “How could this be?” If she was planning on becoming married rather than maintaining her virginity vows than the idea of her ever getting pregnant would not have been confusing for her and she would not have asked, “How could this be?”

Oral Tradition tells us that Joseph, Mary’s betrothed, was a widowed elder and already had several children from his previous wife - who are named in the Bible as Jesus brothers as they were his brothers from his earthly “foster” or “step” father.

Jesus didn’t leave his mother to them as it was not their responsiblity to care for her as she wasn’t their mother and he gave her into St. John’s care as he was dying on the cross.
Even St. Thomas Aquinas declared that Mary could not have been perpetually sin free because of how Scripture shows where Mary herself said that she rejoices in God her savior.
 
Even St. Thomas Aquinas declared that Mary could not have been perpetually sin free because of how Scripture shows where Mary herself said that she rejoices in God her savior.
SIA - I believe we’ve addressed that comment before - we all need a Saviour and Christ was Mary’s Saviour as preordained from the Foundation of the World because it was for and on account of his coming that Mary was filled with God’s grace at birth. In that respect, Jesus was her Saviour. We’ve also explored why this Catholic teaching is not contrary to scripture and how it is “fitting” that she would have been sinless. Was it necessary? No - God could do anything.

Blessings,

Brian
 
SIA - I believe we’ve addressed that comment before - we all need a Saviour and Christ was Mary’s Saviour as preordained from the Foundation of the World because it was for and on account of his coming that Mary was filled with God’s grace at birth. In that respect, Jesus was her Saviour. We’ve also explored why this Catholic teaching is not contrary to scripture and how it is “fitting” that she would have been sinless. Was it necessary? No - God could do anything.

Blessings,

Brian
I’m not sure how you reconcile Mary’s apparent sinlessness with Romans 3:

No One Is Righteous

9 What then? Are we Jews [1] any better off? [2] No, not at all. For we have already charged that all, both Jews and Greeks, are under sin, 10 as it is written:

“None is righteous, no, not one;
11 no one understands;
no one seeks for God.
12 All have turned aside; together they have become worthless;
no one does good,
not even one.”
13 “Their throat is an open grave;
they use their tongues to deceive.”
“The venom of asps is under their lips.”
14 “Their mouth is full of curses and bitterness.”
15 “Their feet are swift to shed blood;
16 in their paths are ruin and misery,
17 and the way of peace they have not known.”
18 “There is no fear of God before their eyes.”

19 Now we know that whatever the law says it speaks to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God. 20 For by works of the law no human being [3] will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin.

The Righteousness of God Through Faith

21 But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it— 22 the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. 26 It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.
 
I’m not sure how you reconcile Mary’s apparent sinlessness with Romans 3:

No One Is Righteous

9 What then? Are we Jews [1] any better off? [2] No, not at all. For we have already charged that all, both Jews and Greeks, are under sin, 10 as it is written:

“None is righteous, no, not one;
11 no one understands;
no one seeks for God.
12 All have turned aside; together they have become worthless;
no one does good,
not even one.”
13 “Their throat is an open grave;
they use their tongues to deceive.”
“The venom of asps is under their lips.”
14 “Their mouth is full of curses and bitterness.”
15 “Their feet are swift to shed blood;
16 in their paths are ruin and misery,
17 and the way of peace they have not known.”
18 “There is no fear of God before their eyes.”

19 Now we know that whatever the law says it speaks to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be stopped, and the whole world may be held accountable to God. 20 For by works of the law no human being [3] will be justified in his sight, since through the law comes knowledge of sin.

The Righteousness of God Through Faith

21 But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it— 22 the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. 26 It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.
Yes - but clearly this did not include, for example, Jesus who, while fully human (and divine) was sinless from birth in his human nature. Is it not possible that God created Mary with faith in Christ at birth and thus sinless through the imputed righteousness of Christ. The sinlessness of Mary is a belief/statement of faith of the Church and thus a statement I take on faith. It is not inconsistent with scripture, though can’t be proved by scripture alone, but is testified to by tradition of the early Church and the apostolic authority of the Church (Papacy).

It is also fitting for just as the Ark of the Covenant was pure (so pure - humans, other than the high priest, could not even touch it(which held the Word (10 commandments); the symbol of priesthood (staff of Aaron) and food of life (manna from heaven) so Mary was sinless and pure and, as the new Ark of the Covenant held the Word (Jesus Christ, the word in flesh held in her womb); the symbol of priesthood (Jesus Christ, the priest in the order of Melchizadek) and the food of eternal life (the flesh of Jesus Christ). was pure and could not even be touched.

Again - Mary did not have to be sinless to hold Christ - but it was fitting that she was and I believe she was. Scripture does not say she was not - but implies that she was sinless (full of grace).

Blessings,

Brian
 
Yes - but clearly this did not include, for example, Jesus who, while fully human (and divine) was sinless from birth in his human nature. Is it not possible that God created Mary with faith in Christ at birth and thus sinless through the imputed righteousness of Christ. The sinlessness of Mary is a belief/statement of faith of the Church and thus a statement I take on faith. It is not inconsistent with scripture, though can’t be proved by scripture alone, but is testified to by tradition of the early Church and the apostolic authority of the Church (Papacy).

It is also fitting for just as the Ark of the Covenant was pure (so pure - humans, other than the high priest, could not even touch it(which held the Word (10 commandments); the symbol of priesthood (staff of Aaron) and food of life (manna from heaven) so Mary was sinless and pure and, as the new Ark of the Covenant held the Word (Jesus Christ, the word in flesh held in her womb); the symbol of priesthood (Jesus Christ, the priest in the order of Melchizadek) and the food of eternal life (the flesh of Jesus Christ). was pure and could not even be touched.

Again - Mary did not have to be sinless to hold Christ - but it was fitting that she was and I believe she was. Scripture does not say she was not - but implies that she was sinless (full of grace).

Blessings,

Brian
I was going to mentioned Jesus as the exception, but I didn’t think I needed to. I think you cannot compare Jesus with Mary since the 2nd person of the godhead is eternal. Mary like to rest of us was a created being who also had Adam as her representative (original sin). How do you reconcile Romans 5 with Mary’s apparent sinlessness? If Mary was without sin,why did she die?

Death in Adam, Life in Christ
12 Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned— 13 for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. 14 Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come.

15 But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man’s trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many. 16 And the free gift is not like the result of that one man’s sin. For the judgment following one trespass brought condemnation, but the free gift following many trespasses brought justification. 17 For if, because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ.

18 Therefore, as one trespass [5] led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness [6] leads to justification and life for all men. 19 For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous. 20 Now the law came in to increase the trespass, but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more, 21 so that, as sin reigned in death, grace also might reign through righteousness leading to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. - Rom 5
 
Its a fair question - to which there are a couple of possible answers.
  1. The death referred to in Genesis is spiritual death - and indeed, Adam and Eve, upon sin, did experience spiritual death (as well as ultimate physical death). Mary, as sinless, never experienced spiritual death (just as those of us who utlimately came to faith in our lifetimes share in eternal life with Christ).
  2. The official Church teaching on Mary does not specify whether her bodily assumption occurred after death or without death - we know it was without corruption. I personally believe she experienced physical, but not spiritual death - I"ll find out, God willing, in heaven - but I know she is here with me right now as I write this (praise be to God).
Blessings,

Brian
 
Its a fair question - to which there are a couple of possible answers.
  1. The death referred to in Genesis is spiritual death - and indeed, Adam and Eve, upon sin, did experience spiritual death (as well as ultimate physical death). Mary, as sinless, never experienced spiritual death (just as those of us who utlimately came to faith in our lifetimes share in eternal life with Christ).
  2. The official Church teaching on Mary does not specify whether her bodily assumption occurred after death or without death - we know it was without corruption. I personally believe she experienced physical, but not spiritual death - I"ll find out, God willing, in heaven - but I know she is here with me right now as I write this (praise be to God).
Blessings,

Brian
I don’t mean to sound offensive. All Christians have a struggle of religious affections for God and the world. The Apostle John writes at the end of 1 John to keep ourselves from idols. Protestants and Catholics can create religious idols of the heart. I’ve sinned in the past in making Reformed Theology a religious idols at times. I have to go back to the gospel of God’s grace, focusing on Jesus Christ. It seems many Catholics have deeper affection and love for Mary than for Jesus. If that’s true at times, Mary becomes a religious idol of the heart. I also found this true in regard to Catholics who seem to proclaim the Catholic church than proclaiming Jesus Christ. Do you think I am way off base on my discernment, and why?
 
Actually, I think most of my reasons for not being Catholic are theological…

The Immaculate Conception, papal infallibility, the whole idea that God only gives grace in the ways prescribed in the Church’s rituals, and the Church’s stance on those areas of moral theology dealing with husbands, wives, and what they do in bed together (as mentioned in the Catechism), are all things I disagree with
 
I don’t mean to sound offensive. All Christians have a struggle of religious affections for God and the world. The Apostle John writes at the end of 1 John to keep ourselves from idols. Protestants and Catholics can create religious idols of the heart. I’ve sinned in the past in making Reformed Theology a religious idols at times. I have to go back to the gospel of God’s grace, focusing on Jesus Christ. It seems many Catholics have deeper affection and love for Mary than for Jesus. If that’s true at times, Mary becomes a religious idol of the heart. I also found this true in regard to Catholics who seem to proclaim the Catholic church than proclaiming Jesus Christ. Do you think I am way off base on my discernment, and why?
No - I don’t think you are way off in that I have not doubt there are many Catholics who, while with good intention, are sadly ingorant of actual Church teaching on Mary and the Saints and may well at times in appropriately worship or idolize Mary or the Saints (just as there are may Protestants who have, through ignorance of their own church teaching, fallen into heresy (relative to their own denonmination’s teaching) and perverted the gospel). This is not, however, what the Church teaches. The Church teaches that it is appropriate to venerate Mary and the Saints as a way of honoring those who have had led exemplary lives and who are served as wonderful examples to other Christians. This is a little off topic, but the fact that many within any the Christian community (any denomination) may pervert the gospel or their Church’s teaching in practice does not bear on the truth of the gospel and so the fact that some Catholics may inappropriately idolize Mary or the Saints does not bear on the truth of the Church’s teaching on veneration of the Saints.

Blessings,

Brian
 
No - I don’t think you are way off in that I have not doubt there are many Catholics who, while with good intention, are sadly ingorant of actual Church teaching on Mary and the Saints and may well at times in appropriately worship or idolize Mary or the Saints (just as there are may Protestants who have, through ignorance of their own church teaching, fallen into heresy (relative to their own denonmination’s teaching) and perverted the gospel). This is not, however, what the Church teaches. The Church teaches that it is appropriate to venerate Mary and the Saints as a way of honoring those who have had led exemplary lives and who are served as wonderful examples to other Christians. This is a little off topic, but the fact that many within any the Christian community (any denomination) may pervert the gospel or their Church’s teaching in practice does not bear on the truth of the gospel and so the fact that some Catholics may inappropriately idolize Mary or the Saints does not bear on the truth of the Church’s teaching on veneration of the Saints.

Blessings,

Brian
That well written and I believe it is true. We all know in part, and press on by the power of God to our upward calling in Christ… with much struggle. I see Romans 7 to be the regenerate Christian’s walk. When we are weak, God is strong in us.

Here is the end of 1 John:

That You May Know
13 I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God that you may know that you have eternal life. 14 And this is the confidence that we have toward him, that if we ask anything according to his will he hears us. 15 And if we know that he hears us in whatever we ask, we know that we have the requests that we have asked of him.

16 If anyone sees his brother committing a sin not leading to death, he shall ask, and God [1] will give him life—to those who commit sins that do not lead to death. There is sin that leads to death; I do not say that one should pray for that. 17 All wrongdoing is sin, but there is sin that does not lead to death.

18 We know that everyone who has been born of God does not keep on sinning, but he who was born of God protects him, and the evil one does not touch him.

19 We know that we are from God, and the whole world lies in the power of the evil one.

20 And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true; and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life. 21 Little children, keep yourselves from idols.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top