S
Savagedds
Guest
Good Morning,
While studying Rev. 14:1-5 I was searching “Daughter of Zion”, and noticed Lamentations 4:20-22:
The breath of our nostrils, the LORD’s anointed, was taken in their pits, he of whom we said, “Under his shadow we shall live among the nations.” Rejoice and be glad, O daughter of Edom, dweller in the land of Uz; but to you also the cup shall pass; you shall become drunk and strip yourself bare. The punishment of your iniquity, O daughter of Zion, is accomplished, he will keep you in exile no longer; but your iniquity, O daughter of Edom, he will punish, he will uncover your sins. (RSV)
Church Fathers saw in this a prediction of Christ’s incarnation and passion, but I also wonder if it can be tied to Revelation and the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. The virgin Daughter of Zion can be seen clearly in Revelation 12:1. Since she stands for God’s people, is it possible that the ‘daughter of Edom’ represents the apostate leadership in Jerusalem, where Herod the Edomite and his dynasty were in league with pagan Rome and opposed to God’s people?
I can’t find this in any commentaries but it makes sense to me. If so, she was certainly “laid bare” when the Romans destroyed Jerusalem in 70.
Pax,
Jim
While studying Rev. 14:1-5 I was searching “Daughter of Zion”, and noticed Lamentations 4:20-22:
The breath of our nostrils, the LORD’s anointed, was taken in their pits, he of whom we said, “Under his shadow we shall live among the nations.” Rejoice and be glad, O daughter of Edom, dweller in the land of Uz; but to you also the cup shall pass; you shall become drunk and strip yourself bare. The punishment of your iniquity, O daughter of Zion, is accomplished, he will keep you in exile no longer; but your iniquity, O daughter of Edom, he will punish, he will uncover your sins. (RSV)
Church Fathers saw in this a prediction of Christ’s incarnation and passion, but I also wonder if it can be tied to Revelation and the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. The virgin Daughter of Zion can be seen clearly in Revelation 12:1. Since she stands for God’s people, is it possible that the ‘daughter of Edom’ represents the apostate leadership in Jerusalem, where Herod the Edomite and his dynasty were in league with pagan Rome and opposed to God’s people?
I can’t find this in any commentaries but it makes sense to me. If so, she was certainly “laid bare” when the Romans destroyed Jerusalem in 70.
Pax,
Jim