Is being a Catholic that different from being a Muslim?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rozellelily
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Muslims do not interpret the Old Testament in the same way that Jews and Christians do. They believe that Ishmael was the son of Abraham that God preferred, not Israel. That is just the beginning of the differences.

They believe that Jesus was a prophet, just like Mohammed.

They do not believe Jesus was crucified.
 
Well, when Mohamed began Islam he based it off of Christianity and Judaism as a response to the polytheism he had grown up in. He was tired of it. Since he derived Islam from both Christianity and Judaism there will be many similarities. However, just like Protestants share many of Holy Mother Church’s views because they came from her, they also have major differences that could not be reconciled to the true faith. Every religion has some aspect of the truth in them, but only The Catholic Church has the fullness of truth and the Holy Eaucharist.
 
The Muslim faith is a response to the Trinity. Monotheism was not new. Yet over every entrance of Mosque is written… God is one and Muhammad is his prophet.
 
Right, but what I meant was that Mecca at the time of his life was a booming trading post. The Kabba itself was, in the beginning, made to be a place where traders could make offerings to their idols upon arriving in Mecca. Later on Mohamed consecrated it. Monotheism was not new, but around Mohamed polytheism was all over the place. He was I pressed by Christianity and Judaism, which is why he took from them.
 
The statement ‘God is One’ would not be a development that arises from polytheism. It would be next to meaningless to a polytheist. A polytheist might say, " yup so are all of mine" Monotheism rises out of polytheism with titles such as ‘the most high God’ That the most high god or any god is also one is a given. The only reason I can see to say “God is One” is to refute the idea that God is three.
 
Last edited:
Catholicism is based on the deposit of Jesus to his disciples. And countless more people over the years.

(Sunni) Islam is based on the revelations of only Muhammad, with strange rules in Islam that only favour him.
 
I’m not arguing any stance you may have, I was giving the OP a reason why Islam and Christiany have several similar aspects. I’m not saying Mohamed derived his point of view from his polytheism. He was in the middle of a culture that was saturated by it through no fault of his own. It’s just how things were at the time of his early life. He simply was tired of the polytheistic religions that surrounded him. That is what I meant by “as a response”. He was trying to get away from that and find the One God that Judaism and Christianity professed. Just like there were polytheistic people who arrived at Mecca during this time for trading purposes, Christians and Jewish people arrived as well. Mohamed was attracted to the religions, but did not fully agree with them. I’m not sure if what you are arguing in that last sentence is a statement questioning the concept of The Trinity, but if it is, ( now I’m not sure what religion you are) we as Christians ( for the most part) profess One God in three distinct persons. They are not like three different parts of a God, that is to say, they aren’t like completeting a God by each adding something. They are one substance all the while being different persons. It’s a mystery of Our Faith that can never really be understood. Again, take out any history book, Mohamed lived a time when Mecca was a trading post. It was a booming city that linked the Mediterranean with South Arabia, East Africa, and South Asia. The Kabba, whose first construction dates back to the 5th century by the Quraysh tribe, originally was a place where these traders from different places in the world left offerings to their Gods ( especially Hubal, who was at the time Mecca’s most important pagan deity). Mohamed stumbled upon Christianity and Judaism because of trade.Though he liked and kept several key aspects from both religions, he didn’t fully agree with either one and came up with his own doctrine based off of the ideas that he he accepted for both Christianity and Judaism. This is why there are many parallels. Grant it, the differences are crucial and are the reason why the church rejected Mohamed’s visions and revelations. They were false. Now am Insaying he made them up? Not necessarily, without meaning any disrespect to our Muslim brothers and sisters, there may even be a psychological explanation behind them. Obviously, we’ll never know. As to polytheism and monotheism, the main difference between the two is that though, as you say polytheism would simply embrace any new deity presented to it ( for the most part), Monotheism holds its one daity to be the only one and true deity. Mecca boomed as a trading post precisely because of its polytheistic views. It embraced every God that arrived to it. However, Monotheism condemns the recognition of any deity outside of its own.
 
Last edited:
We are, depending on how charitable (or not) we are. The key is recognizing Christ in others. Yes, everyone.
 
The relationship between God and His people is something I find significant.

Islam: God relates to people as master or owner

Christianity: God relates to people as loving father
A precision:
Christianity: God relates to people as loving father AND as master or owner. The one does not exclude the other
 
Monotheism holds its one daity to be the only one and true deity. Mecca boomed as a trading post precisely because of its polytheistic views. It embraced every God that arrived to it.
This makes a good point.
as you say polytheism would simply embrace any new deity presented to it ( for the most part),
That’s true but that isn’t the point I was trying to make.
Monotheism condemns the recognition of any deity outside of its own.
That is true too. Not to be argumentative but to clarify my original point.
My point is that the central testimony of monotheism for Muslims isn’t aimed at the polytheistic culture that it replaced. The Shahada proclaims the oneness of God first then it proclaims Muhammed as prophet.

The oneness of God isn’t a proclamation that would concern a polytheist… The second is a declaration that Muhammed is a prophet of a line of prophets of previous Abrahamic religions that don’t accept him as a prophet.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, no I’m sorry. I wasn’t in any way trying to say that it was. I worded my statement wrong. Like I said, when I read about it in class, it just kind of seemed like he was tired of it all. Thanks for your comments and insight though 🙂
 
I think that Christians grow in a sort of deep love for God and thus for those whom He created and therefore loves.

Imagine seeing someone kind of like you in age and sex but who is homeless in winter due to having lost a leg. And your heart goes out to her in a way that it might not to a scary-looking homeless person. That stirring of compassion is the sort of thing I’m talking about: in Christianity that should be growing.

See how different that is from a corporation setting up a homeless shelter for the tax breaks and publicity?

The sheep are those who follow the Shepherd, Jesus. The goats are those who eat their neighbor’s clothes…
 
Muslims go for theocracy, where at least some of the leaders in the nation are actual religious leaders, like ayatollahs and imams in Iran.

Catholicism actually rejected theocracy, altho it continues to believe that the best nation would be mostly Catholic in population and based on Catholic principles, but this is true of any adherent to a particular world view: Democrats, for example, or Communists, or Calvinists, or conservatives, or…
 
Maybe I have the same feelings and thoughts like you.

Many oft the muslim precepts are the same with the Catholic ones.

But there are simple differences such as muslims believe that Ismael was the son Abraham who was going to be sacrificed to God according to Quran, but Christians believe that Isaac was the one to be sacrificed according to the Holy Bible. Which one is true? Islam claims that the many of the contents in the Bible are corrupt and manipulated. Is it true?

Was Mohammad authorized to be the messenger of God? Compared to Jesus he was truly authorized by the Living God as indicated by His baptism by John the Baptist: " And Jesus being baptized, forthwith came out of the water: and lo, the heavens were opened to him: and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove, and coming upon him. [17] And behold a voice from heaven, saying: This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased."

There are many events that indicate that He was truly authorized by God to be His Messenger _ at least_ and there were witnesses like the transfiguration at mount Tabor.

Fast forward, the Catholic girl who married a muslim risks of having her muslim husband marry another wife and other women without her consent.
 
Pardon, we catholics do not believe Jesus to be greatest and last of the prophets, no, He IS Who the prophets wrote about, so no, it isn’t so, now Jesus DID make a few prophecies, if that’s what you mean
 
The Catholic Church mostly stopped killing people in the name of religion about 600-800 years ago. Islam hasn’t.

One can only imagine the carnage of the Crusades if modern weaponry was available.
 
Pardon, we catholics do not believe Jesus to be greatest and last of the prophets, no, He IS Who the prophets wrote about, so no, it isn’t so, now Jesus DID make a few prophecies, if that’s what you mean
Yes, the prophets wrote about Him- but that doesn’t mean that Jesus wasn’t/isn’t a prophet Himself. He spoke the Word of God, even being the Word Himself.
 
That would be saying God is a prophet. God is not a prophet, just because He tells us what is going to happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top