L
lobster
Guest
Yes, women can be guilty of rape.Your mother was not wrong in saying that some women put them selves in a dangerous spot, but she is wrong if she said rape is ever a womans fault.
Yes, women can be guilty of rape.Your mother was not wrong in saying that some women put them selves in a dangerous spot, but she is wrong if she said rape is ever a womans fault.
Yes, women can be guilty of rape.
I understand where you are coming from, but myself having a close link to a woman who use to rape young adolescent boys, tragic as it is, indeed a woman most certainly can be guilty of rape. Please pray for her.a woman or child is never guilty of rape.
That’s just horrible! Women are supposed to be equipped with maternal instincts when it comes to the nurturing of children. I cannot even begin to understand!!I understand where you are coming from, but myself having a close link to a woman who use to rape young adolescent boys, tragic as it is, indeed a woman most certainly can be guilty of rape. Please pray for her.
The “Enlightenment” was one of the worst things to happen to mankind.Not uniformly wonderful…nothing is. But overall one of the best things to happen to mankind.
I know, it is just awful, and makes me cry every time I think about it. Thank you for your prayers.That’s just horrible! Women are supposed to be equipped with maternal instincts when it comes to the nurturing of children. I cannot even begin to understand!!
I pray all the time for the protection of children as I am a survivor myself. I offer my cross to God in turn for the safety of potential victims.
I really hope you guys are kidding. Before the Enlightenment, humans were chained to superstition and religious fanaticism and used “God” as an answer to everything.The “Enlightenment” was one of the worst things to happen to mankind.
It, along with the “Reformation” gave people the idea that they didn’t need to obey God, that they could come up with their own moral codes based on their “reason” alone.
This leads directly to Rousseau, the French Revolution, socialism, atheism, etc., etc.
All the modern terrors of totalitarianism, social darwinism, eugenics, etc. can be traced directly to the erroneous notions of the Enlightenment.
God Bless
You are buying into to modernist, and Protestant propaganda about the Middle Ages.I really hope you guys are kidding. Before the Enlightenment, humans were chained to superstition and religious fanaticism and used “God” as an answer to everything.
“Why did that mother die in childbirth?”
“Her father must have sinned a terrible sin.”
No, it was because the “doctors” had no access to any kind of modern medicine and she got infected.
“Is the Earth the center of the cosmos?”
“Of course it is, God wouldn’t have put humans second to any other creation.”
Sorry to break it to you, but He didn’t.
The Enlightenment can be thanked for helping to break down humans’ ego-centric view of themselves and Earth in God’s plan.
Hey, I’m not saying that nothing bad or evil came out of the Enlightenment. Bad things occasionally come out of every institution, whether it be the United States or the Catholic Church. But overall, we can trace a ridiculous amount of progress and knowledge to the time a few hundred years ago when people started asking tough questions and experimenting instead of just accepting “God” as the answer to everything.
What the person meant here was that the rape victim (who, in the vast, vast majority of cases are women or children) is never guilty of rape.I understand where you are coming from, but myself having a close link to a woman who use to rape young adolescent boys, tragic as it is, indeed a woman most certainly can be guilty of rape. Please pray for her.
I find it amazing that people will condemn any movement because it doesn’t get EVERYTHING correct, that they will blame ALL the sins of the world on it and want to go back to a previous time which is seen as a “Golden Age” but actually wasn’t.Hey, I’m not saying that nothing bad or evil came out of the Enlightenment. Bad things occasionally come out of every institution, whether it be the United States or the Catholic Church. But overall, we can trace a ridiculous amount of progress and knowledge to the time a few hundred years ago when people started asking tough questions and experimenting instead of just accepting “God” as the answer to everything.
If that’s aimed at me, it’s because I don’t think anything good came out of the “Enlightenment”. Biased (usually Protestant or atheist) historians love to demonize the Church. They want to claim the Church “held back” progress.I find it amazing that people will condemn any movement because it doesn’t get EVERYTHING correct, that they will blame ALL the sins of the world on it and want to go back to a previous time which is seen as a “Golden Age” but actually wasn’t.
Why not take the good of it and throw out the bad?
No, it’s a statement of my view that in nearly everything, including movements, there is good and bad. From 99.99% good to the same proportion bad with most in between.If that’s aimed at me.
That is certainly true. Of course, human discourse tends to speak in extremes. If you caveat an argument too much, it loses all force.No, it’s a statement of my view that in nearly everything, including movements, there is good and bad. From 99.99% good to the same proportion bad with most in between.
Easy with that. That sounds like an ideological standpoint.I really hope you guys are kidding. Before the Enlightenment, humans were chained to superstition and religious fanaticism and used “God” as an answer to everything.
That would not be consistent with Christianity because Our Lord teaches that misfortunes in life do not need to be consequences of our sins or sins of our ancestors. See for example Luke 13:1-5.“Why did that mother die in childbirth?”
“Her father must have sinned a terrible sin.”
Actually, there are more possible medical causes of death in childbirth than merely infection, which you would probably not deny, since you likely used that as an example. Obviously, medicine was not as advanced as today, but it would be rather wrong if it were less advanced today than it was then or if we hadn’t done any progress.No, it was because the “doctors” had no access to any kind of modern medicine and she got infected.
Would you care to explain the link between the last sentence and the one before?“Is the Earth the center of the cosmos?”
“Of course it is, God wouldn’t have put humans second to any other creation.”
Sorry to break it to you, but He didn’t.
I think you forgot Copernicus discovered that the Earth was round and revolved around the sun. You do not need to believe me, but you ought to check the facts. You also seem to see our modern moon travels and survey of the space as a direct boon of the Enlightenment, which is a bit too far-fetched.The Enlightenment can be thanked for helping to break down humans’ ego-centric view of themselves and Earth in God’s plan.
God is the beginning and the end, so ultimately He is the answer to everything. He is also the one who gave us reason and He gave it to us specifically so that we would use it. Nothing good - scientifically or elsewhere - comes from starting to make a premise of rejecting God - or, for that matter, from rejecting the premise of God. Rejecting or distancing ourselves from God is not a mark of progress. Progress is done by using the gift of reason which we received from God (without prejudice to the use of other gifts given from God, as all are necessary in our continued progress). Making simplistic answers and rejecting deeper thinking would halt progress. Accepting simple facts of physics as necessarily a divine intervention could be called superstition. However, a belief that God is the centre of the universe - which does not mean that the universe is greater than God, because strictly speaking the universe exists in God - is not superstition.Hey, I’m not saying that nothing bad or evil came out of the Enlightenment. Bad things occasionally come out of every institution, whether it be the United States or the Catholic Church. But overall, we can trace a ridiculous amount of progress and knowledge to the time a few hundred years ago when people started asking tough questions and experimenting instead of just accepting “God” as the answer to everything.
Who could complain about the Hundred Years War? Or three simultaneous popes? or the Peasants Revolt (or even the existence of peasants)? or the absolutely brilliant idea of western Europeans sacking Constantinople? Or the social upheaval of the Great Famine in the decades before the plague?… in the 12-14th centuries, before the plague hit. Why do we never hear about that?..
I do not believe you have done any thing wrong. And what is important most of all is the journey upon which we are on.I was raised Protestant and when I was 16, someone close to me took advantage of me, it wasn’t a stereotypical back-alley rape scenario. It was more like imprisonment and coercion. I told my mother about it hypothetically, to get an idea of her reaction, and she said she thinks getting raped is wrong because you shouldn’t put yourself in situations where it could happen. After that, I told no one. Because of the coercion and my mother’s reaction I felt guilty for it for many years. So my question is, was I still a virgin? Was it a sin?
I hope this does not offend anyone.