R
rogue13
Guest
Check this out from John Martignoni’s last newsletter: biblechristiansociety.com/newsletter/detail/275
A provocative and well thought piece…one we’d do well to ponder.Check this out from John Martignoni’s last newsletter: biblechristiansociety.com/newsletter/detail/275
Actually, he isn’t offering his opinion. Nowhere did he say that a person goes to Heaven or Hell based on whether or not he receives the Eucharist. That is a misreading of what he said. However, doesn’t Scripture somewhere say that unless one eats the flesh of the Son of Man and drinks His blood, he has no life within him? So, it is written, isn’t it?His opinion is just that, his opinion. It is not written that a person must receive the Eucharist in order to go to heaven, or if one does not they will go to hell.
If one is in a state of grace and visibly a member of the Church, one does well to receive the Eucharist, and receives many graces from it that will expand one’s capacity for happiness, both in this world and in the next.Actually, he isn’t offering his opinion. Nowhere did he say that a person goes to Heaven or Hell based on whether or not he receives the Eucharist. That is a misreading of what he said. However, doesn’t Scripture somewhere say that unless one eats the flesh of the Son of Man and drinks His blood, he has no life within him? So, it is written, isn’t it?
But, that is not the main point of the newsletter - deciding who goes to Heaven and who goes to Hell. The main point is the question - how would you answer his question: Is a person better off by receiving the Eucharist vs. not receiving the Eucharist? Yes or no? Is a person’s chance of being saved increased by receiving the Eucharist? Yes or no?
But as Mr. Martignoni actually pointed out, we have a better chance of going to heaven by receiving the Holy Eucharist. This truth is indisputable. “The Eucharist is ‘the source and summit of the Christian life’” (CCC 1324). It is the greatest source of sanctifying grace which the soul needs to enter heaven. Also, it is true that no human being, including the Pope when he canonizes someone a saint, infallibly knows whether a person has gone to heaven. This knowledge is simply based on moral certainty. Only God can judge the interior heart of a person. The role of the Church is to preach the word of God and administer the sacraments. She has no prerogative, let alone capability, to infallibly judge our souls.His opinion is just that, his opinion. It is not written that a person must receive the Eucharist in order to go to heaven, or if one does not they will go to hell.
He has said nothing that contradicts Scripture or the Church and his response is even less scary than the Lord’s himself:His opinion is just that, his opinion. It is not written that a person must receive the Eucharist in order to go to heaven, or if one does not they will go to hell.
I think we can safely assume that, given the context, he was not speaking of situations where one would receive the Eucharist unworthily, he was referring to the state of those who do not receive because they are outside of the Catholic Church.However, if not in a state of grace, or if not a member of the visible Church, one eats and drinks damnation on one’s soul by receiving the Eucharist - this is a sacrilege.
Actually, the Church did not “deep six” the notion that “outside of the Church there is no salvation” (extra ecclesiam nulla salus), you may wish to review the Catechism on that (#'s 846-848). Furthermore, Martignoni did not say anything about who goes to Heaven and who goes to Hell - you keep inserting something into his argument that is not there.The Catholic Church deep sixed the notion that only Catholic’s go to heaven years ago. Thank God.
Looked up both and the answer is yes to both. John 6:53, and the Catechism .Actually, the Church did not “deep six” the notion that “outside of the Church there is no salvation” (extra ecclesiam nulla salus), you may wish to review the Catechism on that (#'s 846-848). Furthermore, Martignoni did not say anything about who goes to Heaven and who goes to Hell - you keep inserting something into his argument that is not there.
But, more importantly, you keep avoiding the questions. Would Billy Graham, or any other non-Catholic, have a better chance of being saved by receiving the Eucharist…yes or no? And, now, another question, does the Scripture say that one must eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood in order to achieve salvation…yes or no?
He has said nothing that contradicts Scripture or the Church and his response is even less scary than the Lord’s himself:
“Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you" John 6:53.
You, madame (assuming Kat is short for Katherine, here), are a lady and a scholar. “And you will know the truth and the truth shall set you free.”Looked up both and the answer is yes to both. John 6:53, and the Catechism .
Will be reading both Books more and ignoring the homilies .
Thank you . Glad I posted the way I did because of the true facts I have received.![]()