Is Canon in D appropriate for a wedding processional?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maeglin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Maeglin

Guest
I apologize if this question has been asked ad naseum. A quick search did not turn up the question.

I ask because I will be getting married in a couple weeks, and this was one of the options offered by our cantor. My fiancee and I had a tough time selecting music, but this was one of the few we both liked. However, I don’t know if it is appropriate since a wikipedia article indicates it is chamber music. Does that mean it is restricted from the Catholic mass?

Our cantor did offer a few other choices that seemed iffy (like Wagner’s Wedding Chorus a.k.a Here Comes the Bride and Mendelssohn’s Wedding March from Midsummer’s Night Dream), so I’m not sure I trust her answer on this one.

Thanks!
 
I wouldn’t trust your cantor because the other two selections I know for a fact are not permitted at Catholic weddings. IMHO, regardless if it’s permitted or not, Canon in D is over-played at weddings and would pick something completely different.
 
This is the first I’ve heard that those wedding marches are not permitted at Catholic weddings. Do you have any idea where that has been specified?
 


Our cantor did offer a few other choices that seemed iffy (like Wagner’s Wedding Chorus a.k.a Here Comes the Bride and Mendelssohn’s Wedding March from Midsummer’s Night Dream), so I’m not sure I trust her answer on this one.

Thanks!
there was an old rule against using concert music, but it was being ignored 50 years ago, and few even remember it today.

My wife, an organist and choir director, has a particular dislike of the Wagner, which is a march to the bedroom with no marriage, and the Mendelssohn, which is for a mock wedding.

My wife is away at the moment, and I am not a musician, but as I recall we had a march that was used for one of the British Royal Weddings in the 50’s or 60’s.
 
Pachelbel’s Canon is generally approved for Catholic weddings; our diocese is especially strict about such things and it is often played here.
 
Thank you for your responses everyone.

Well, since it was approved by the church and the cantor and doesn’t seem to get any strong objections here (other than preference) I won’t rock the boat on this one.

Personally, I think it’s a beautiful song although of course a bit stereotypical for wedding music.
there was an old rule against using concert music, but it was being ignored 50 years ago, and few even remember it today.
I think I have read about this before, which is why I asked. It’s been a long time, but I thought I remember it (chamber music and other secular concert pieces) being forbidden quite a long time ago: perhaps in the baroque or classical periods.
 
Although some parishes do allow it, many I work at as a freelance musician do not permit the Wagner nor the Mendelssohn. This is mainly because it is considered music that automatically has a secular connotation… meaning that the Wagner “Bridal Chorus” is from an actual opera (Lohengrin) and Mendelssohn’s “Wedding March” is from a ballet (A Midsummer Night’s Dream). Besides that, although I do like the music in the actual opera and ballet, the stories behind each piece are a bit counterintuitive with the Sacrament of Marriage. In “Lohengrin”, Elsa and Lohengrin never consummate the marriage because on the wedding night Elsa breaks her promise to Lohengrin of never asking him his origins. Due to breaking her promise, Lohengrin abandons Elsa and she then dies of grief. Mendelssohn’s ballet is beautiful and Shakespeare’s story is a lot of fun, but not really appropriate for a wedding as well (magic and couple’s mixing, confusion, Titania placed under a spell and falling in love with a mortal turned into an ***, etc.) Everything ends happy at the end.

Anyway, I never recommend those pieces for Catholic weddings and I try to explain the reasons to the couple before they meet with the music director/pastor in case that particular parish does permit it for whatever reason so at least they know the background and the reasons, and then they can make their own choice.

For Pachelbel’s “Canon in D”, this is a different matter. It is music that is considered what is called “absolute music”. This is music that doesn’t have any stories behind it nor does it come from an opera, ballet, play, musical theater, etc. This kind of music is often acceptable because of that - much like a lot organ instrumental music or other kinds of instrumental music (a lot of the “typical” wedding music that we think is for the organ was actually only transcribed for organ.) Now, I have heard of some pastors not allowing any kind of non-liturgical music for weddings, even music specifically written for just the organ alone. I know the previous pastor where I worked was like that. Hymns were the only music permitted, so no organ fugues, no works that were originally written for masses or other liturgical functions like Haydn’s, Mozart’s, Charpentier’s, etc. liturgical works. But they are quite few and far between.
 
Though Canon in D might be permissible, my personal opinion would be not to use it.

Other posters are correct that it’s overplayed and that’s really unfortunate as it isn’t a great example of music from that time period.

You might consider Bach’s “Jesu, Joy of Man’s Desiring,” Purcell’s “Trumpet Voluntary,” or any number of other pieces from the Baroque period, if you like this time period.

In the end, though, the cantor is someone you likely have hired to sing at your wedding liturgy. Decisions like these are best made by the 2 who are getting married. Though lots of people here can give you THEIR opinions, not yours.

Good Luck in your final days of preparation! May God bless this time and your marriage!!!
 
We used Canon in D for our processional in the Catholic Church. Also, even though we didn’t use it our priest would allow the Wedding March to be used, though most Catholic Churches do not allow it.

We used Cannon in D for the Bridesmaids processional and Trumpet Voluntary for the brides procession.
 
I wouldn’t trust your cantor because the other two selections I know for a fact are not permitted at Catholic weddings. IMHO, regardless if it’s permitted or not, Canon in D is over-played at weddings and would pick something completely different.
It may be overplayed but it does have a lot of variations. The same eight chords (D A Bm F#m G D G A) are repeated over two measures so it’s very easy to improvise a little.
 
Interesting. Thanks for the information. I can’t even remember if I’ve been to a wedding that used the actual wedding march. I think its prevalence in movies has definitely colored my memory,
 
Noel Goemanne used “Canon in D” as a hymn tune, writing religious lyrics (“O Lord, our God, Wisdom, Joy and Peace and Love Divine…”) Goemanne’s arrangement was popularized by the 1980 film “Ordinary People.” My public high school choir sang it at our baccalaureate service in the late 1980s (back when public schools still had baccalaureate services).

You can see Goemanne’s lyrics at holytrinitymusic.com/Canon_in_D_(Goemanne).html
 
Another possibility that’s a bit more unusual for a wedding but makes for a dignified, sedate march up the aisle, Clarke’s Trumpet Voluntary for Organ.

Best wishes!
 
One reason the Canon in D is popular at weddings is that it is possible for the musicians to bring the music to a close every 4 measures due to its regular cadences. In a church wedding where there is a certain solemnity to the processional music, it is not necessarily important to finish the music at the exact moment that the bride reaches the sanctuary. There can be a sense of enjoying the music and the joyousness of the ceremony as the music is coming to a close. In the garden weddings that I play, however, there is much more importance placed on finishing precisely when the bride reaches the front of the aisle and stopping on a dime, otherwise the pastor or judge might start talking before we are finished. The Canon allows the musicians to quickly end without it coming to a crashing halt. When you have 4 players, as in a string quartet, it can be more difficult to coordinate the ending than a single musician at the organ. Since more and more couples have been marrying outside the Church in garden ceremonies and hiring string quartets and trios, this accounts for the rise in popularity of this piece, in my opinion.

It is lovely, and there are lyrics to it, as was previously mentioned, so it can be done more in a hymn style, if you like. Even after playing the Canon in D at hundreds of weddings, I still like it. 🙂

My husband and I chose the hymn “Be Thou My Vision” which is set to the ancient Irish melody, Slane for the processional at our wedding.

May God bless you on your wedding day!
 
Pachelbel’s Canon is generally approved for Catholic weddings; our diocese is especially strict about such things and it is often played here.
Actually, it falls under the category of secular music and it would not be permitted. Jesu, Jesu Joy of Man’s Desiring is what a lot of brides will pick as the entrance processional.

While we are on the subject, here is something that I posted last October. Someone from the Church Music Association of America had posted it on Musica Sacra.

benedictgal-lexorandilexcredendi.blogspot.com/2010/10/bridezilla-meets-organist.html

Church musicians will find a huge ring of truth to this.
 
Interesting. Thanks for the information. I can’t even remember if I’ve been to a wedding that used the actual wedding march. I think its prevalence in movies has definitely colored my memory,
It is also depicted in reality TV shows like a Wedding Story, Whose Wedding Is It Anyway and Bridezillas. 😦
 
I agree Canon in D is overplayed. I’ve used Trumpet Voluntary, Jesu, Joy of Man’s Desiring, and others. At my wedding, my wife and I chose Come and Journey With Me by David Haas. Music Director friend of mine showed that to us, and we thought it was great for weddings. I sang it recently at one I did a few weeks ago.
 
Actually, it falls under the category of secular music and it would not be permitted. Jesu, Jesu Joy of Man’s Desiring is what a lot of brides will pick as the entrance processional.
It depends on the parish. At the very strict parish where I attend and often play at weddings, the music director allows Pachelbel Canon. As Sarabande mentioned earlier, the Canon in D falls under the category of absolute music. There are no associations with a story, such as an opera or ballet, so I would not describe it as secular. Again, at my very strict parish, they do not allow Wagner’s Bridal Chorus or Mendelssohn’s Wedding March, or any pop music that is not religious in nature. But, the Canon is allowed. Either the sung version (with words that are religious), or purely instrumental, it is allowed.
 
It depends on the parish. At the very strict parish where I attend and often play at weddings, the music director allows Pachelbel Canon. As Sarabande mentioned earlier, the Canon in D falls under the category of absolute music. There are no associations with a story, such as an opera or ballet, so I would not describe it as secular. Again, at my very strict parish, they do not allow Wagner’s Bridal Chorus or Mendelssohn’s Wedding March, or any pop music that is not religious in nature. But, the Canon is allowed. Either the sung version (with words that are religious), or purely instrumental, it is allowed.
I think what also should be mentioned is that if the “Canon in D” shouldn’t be allowed, then neither should be the Clarke “Trumpet Voluntary”, Purcell “Trumpet Tune”, Handel movements from his “Hornpipe” or “Watermusic”, Mouret “Rondeau”, Delalande “Musique Royale”, Clarke “Serenade and Fanfare”, Campra “Rigadon”, or Lully “Marche Royale” (None of these were originally written just for the organ, but were transcribed for organ for use in churches and these are often used at weddings). The other thing that shouldn’t be allowed, then would even be any other organ work composed by those such as Bach, Buxtehude, Couperin, Langlais, Dupre, Vierne, Messian, Widor, etc. Now, some of them did compose specific organ works which had titles that evoked something religious, mass-related, dedicated to the Virgin Mary, etc, but most instrumental music (organ music included) is pretty much not considered “sacred” in the sense that it has no indication that it was actually written for mass or written for something secular. That said, I know that there were specific pieces of music written for the organ for use in operas and ballets for instance.

What I think should be determined is how the music is rendered by the instrument itself. Although we could go completely “pure” and not use any instruments at all, we also do know that the church does allow for instrumental music as long as it is appropriate for use in church, such as organ works or transcriptions for organ. Also, many times feast days and other special masses such as weddings, do employ the use of strings, timpani, brass, etc. which we often see in cathedrals, at the Vatican and other churches. So, does it evoke a secular connotation when you hear it? Can the music be refined so that it doesn’t sound secular? Is it well-known enough to know that it is from a play, opera, secular oratorio, ballet, musical theater (think the organ wedding march from “Sound of Music”. Some churches have allowed this because it does sound majestic and much like you’d hear for the typical church organ - which I’m sure Rodgers and Hammerstein was going for, but it was written specifically for a musical, even though it was taking place during a Catholic wedding in the show.)

Now, I always recommend one of my favorite organ transcriptions - Marc-Antoine Charpentier’s “Prelude a Te Deum”. This was originally for orchestra used in church for Charpentier’s “Te Deum”.

I think a lot of classical instrumental music has been accepted for use at church throughout the centuries because it can ***tend ***to lend itself better for liturgy, although NOT ALL classical instrumental or religious/sacred classical vocal music would be appropriate. I think this is where people can get confused and have a hard time drawing the line for classical music at least.

For my wedding, I chose an instrumental version of Holst’s “O God Beyond All Praising” as my processional (although even though it was written for a hymn by him, the theme was still used in his Jupiter movement of “The Planets”) and we used Bach’s Organ Fugue in D-Major for our recessional (no not the Toccata and Fugue in D-MINOR most people would be thinking. 😛 )

Here’s a thought… do we think that his famous toccata and fugue could no longer be used in church because it has become so synonomous with secular things like horror flicks, Disney’s Fantasia, etc.? It was originally absolute music, though, for use in church. I’m on the fence with that because one part of me would say yes even though it was be an incredible postlude after mass.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top