Is Catholicism and Mormonism closer than the two like to admit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jas84173
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Pope invited us to speak at the Vatican Humanum summit on marriage back in 2014.

youtube.com/watch?v=jSgLO9FYgxM

Here’s the Pope meeting LDS President Eyering.
This in no way backs up the claim the LDS are similar to Catholics. Although I do find it fascinating how often meetings with the Pope are used by the LDS to somehow validate their claim of Christianity. Since the LDS believe they are the ONE true church on earth why do they seek such affirmation from the Pope?

From the article linked below. It was an interfaith meeting including Protestant churches, Rabbis and other faith leaders.
Meeting participants also included representatives from the Pentecostal church, Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism and the Church of Latter-Day Saints.

ncregister.com/daily-news/humanum-conference-highlights-sanctity-and-beauty-of-marriage
 
I like all the mormons I ever met–even the one I had a recreational fistfight with. I have noticed a superficial similarity between Catholicism and Mormonism. Both are prolife, pro family, conservative morality, have top down authority structure. Use similar names within the structure although for different positions. They have several chapels under one temple which is remeniscent of parish churches being organized under a cathedral. They have a living apostle with binding authority for doctrine faith and practice.

In my opinion, the similarities are evidence that the Catholic Church is the true church. A Mormon priest, a bishop, who I spent some length of discussion with, said a catholic priest gave him the acknowledgement that one thing the Mormon church has is “it’s either us or them because the Mormon church claims the church was lost and then restored. The Catholic Church claims the church was never lost” In my mind it seems implausible the church could ever be lost considering it is protected by the Good Shepherd who gives His life for the sheep.

I believe the superficial similarities are indicative of a counterfeit operation of the devil or man because while it looks much alike at a glance, the content is very different. A good photocopy of currency may fool the careless tourist long enough to count for change, but he certainly won’t be spending it again.
 
I like all the mormons I ever met–even the one I had a recreational fistfight with. I have noticed a superficial similarity between Catholicism and Mormonism. Both are prolife, pro family, conservative morality, have top down authority structure. Use similar names within the structure although for different positions. They have several chapels under one temple which is remeniscent of parish churches being organized under a cathedral. They have a living apostle with binding authority for doctrine faith and practice.

In my opinion, the similarities are evidence that the Catholic Church is the true church. A Mormon priest, a bishop, who I spent some length of discussion with, said a catholic priest gave him the acknowledgement that one thing the Mormon church has is “it’s either us or them because the Mormon church claims the church was lost and then restored. The Catholic Church claims the church was never lost” In my mind it seems implausible the church could ever be lost considering it is protected by the Good Shepherd who gives His life for the sheep.

I believe the superficial similarities are indicative of a counterfeit operation of the devil or man because while it looks much alike at a glance, the content is very different. A good photocopy of currency may fool the careless tourist long enough to count for change, but he certainly won’t be spending it again.
 
Is Catholicism and Mormonism closer than the two like to admit?
I suppose you could say that.

Then again, I think that Calvinists and Methodists are closer than they like to admit, and Baptists and Catholics are closer than they like to admit, and Orthodox and Lutherans are closer than they like to admit, and Anglicans and Pentecostals are closer than they like to admit.
 
In my opinion, the similarities are evidence that the Catholic Church is the true church. A Mormon priest, a bishop, who I spent some length of discussion with, **said a catholic priest gave him the acknowledgement that one thing the Mormon church has is “it’s either us or them because the Mormon church claims the church was lost and then restored. The Catholic Church claims the church was never lost” **In my mind it seems implausible the church could ever be lost considering it is protected by the Good Shepherd who gives His life for the sheep.

I believe the superficial similarities are indicative of a counterfeit operation of the devil or man because while it looks much alike at a glance, the content is very different. A good photocopy of currency may fool the careless tourist long enough to count for change, but he certainly won’t be spending it again.
Right out of the Mormon myth bag I suspect.

A Catholic priest would never say this. Why?

Well for one, a Catholic priest would know about the Orthodox and the schism between the east and the west. He would think, if it’s not the universal church, then its the Orthodox

Most Mormons don’t know a thing about the Orthodox. Probably aren’t even cognizant that they exist.

SMH
 
Right out of the Mormon myth bag I suspect.

A Catholic priest would never say this. Why?

Well for one, a Catholic priest would know about the Orthodox and the schism between the east and the west. He would think, if it’s not the universal church, then its the Orthodox

Most Mormons don’t know a thing about the Orthodox. Probably aren’t even cognizant that they exist.

SMH
That sounds probable. Still the argument sets up a dichotomy whereby the Mormon religion is easily eliminated. When I meet elders now I take them to task on the ludicrous notion that Christ would lose his church. A man may lose his wife, but Christ who is God the Son can’t be deprived of his bride. Our Heavenly Father who counts the hairs on our heads can surely count his children. He knows his own and his sheep hear his voice. If we walk in the light as he is in the light we have fellowship with one another the the blood of Jesus Christ cleanses us from all sin.

And after all that, the church was ever lost? What do they take me for, a child? After hearing the shepherds voice how could I believe the church would be lost. Perhaps the one goes astray and he goes to rescue the one. But the 99 are not lost.
 
I like all the mormons I ever met–even the one I had a recreational fistfight with. I have noticed a superficial similarity between Catholicism and Mormonism. Both are prolife, pro family, conservative morality, have top down authority structure. Use similar names within the structure although for different positions. They have several chapels under one temple which is remeniscent of parish churches being organized under a cathedral. They have a living apostle with binding authority for doctrine faith and practice.

In my opinion, the similarities are evidence that the Catholic Church is the true church. A Mormon priest, a bishop, who I spent some length of discussion with, said a catholic priest gave him the acknowledgement that one thing the Mormon church has is “it’s either us or them because the Mormon church claims the church was lost and then restored. The Catholic Church claims the church was never lost” In my mind it seems implausible the church could ever be lost considering it is protected by the Good Shepherd who gives His life for the sheep.

I believe the superficial similarities are indicative of a counterfeit operation of the devil or man because while it looks much alike at a glance, the content is very different. A good photocopy of currency may fool the careless tourist long enough to count for change, but he certainly won’t be spending it again.
In my mind it is implausible that a Catholic priest ever said that to the person you were talking with.🤷
 
In my mind it is implausible that a Catholic priest ever said that to the person you were talking with.🤷
One thing I have noticed about Mormonism is a huge emphasis on promoting lies. Sometimes I wonder if the Mormon convert is just a person uniquely talented in believing bad ideas.
 
In my mind it is implausible that a Catholic priest ever said that to the person you were talking with.🤷
That is a very old story. The person who originated the story published it in 1931.
A Catholic Opinion.–Many years ago there came to Salt Lake City a learned doctor of divinity, a member of the Roman Catholic Church. I became well acquainted with him, and we conversed freely and frankly. A great scholar, with perhaps a dozen, languages at his tongue’s end, he seemed to know all about theology, law, literature, science and philosophy, and was never weary of displaying his vast erudition. One day he said to me: “You Mormons are all ignoramuses. You don’t even know the strength of your own position. It is so strong that there is only one other tenable in the whole Christian world, and that is the position of the Catholic Church. The issue is between Catholicism and Mormonism. If we are right, you are wrong; if you are right, we are wrong; and that’s all there is to it. The Protestants haven’t a leg to stand on. If we are wrong, they are wrong with us, for they were a part of us and went out from us; while if we are right, they are apostates whom we cut off long ago. If we really have, as we claim, the apostolic succession from St. Peter, there was no need for Joseph Smith and Mormonism; but if we have not that succession, then such a man as Joseph Smith was necessary, and Mormonism’s attitude is the only consistent one. It is either the perpetuation of the Gospel from ancient times, or the restoration of the Gospel in latter days.”
en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism_and_Christianity/Strength_of_the_Mormon_position_quotation_and_source

“Implausible” is not in it. You are right, however. “Impossible” would be more appropriate. I think this was the OP’s comment, evidence that his belief is weakening as a result of exposing himself to LDS proselytization.
 
I like all the mormons I ever met–even the one I had a recreational fistfight with. I have noticed a superficial similarity between Catholicism and Mormonism. Both are prolife, pro family, conservative morality, have top down authority structure. Use similar names within the structure although for different positions. They have several chapels under one temple which is remeniscent of parish churches being organized under a cathedral. They have a living apostle with binding authority for doctrine faith and practice.

In my opinion, the similarities are evidence that the Catholic Church is the true church. A Mormon priest, a bishop, who I spent some length of discussion with, said a catholic priest gave him the acknowledgement that one thing the Mormon church has is “it’s either us or them because the Mormon church claims the church was lost and then restored. The Catholic Church claims the church was never lost” In my mind it seems implausible the church could ever be lost considering it is protected by the Good Shepherd who gives His life for the sheep.

I believe the superficial similarities are indicative of a counterfeit operation of the devil or man because while it looks much alike at a glance, the content is very different. A good photocopy of currency may fool the careless tourist long enough to count for change, but he certainly won’t be spending it again.
Another problem is that if we admit to the idea that the church was abandoned by God and then restored, how do we know that it won’t happen again? That the “restored” church won’t be again lost?

This would imply a fickle God.
 
That is a very old story. The person who originated the story published it in 1931.

en.fairmormon.org/Mormonism_and_Christianity/Strength_of_the_Mormon_position_quotation_and_source

“Implausible” is not in it. You are right, however. “Impossible” would be more appropriate. I think this was the OP’s comment, evidence that his belief is weakening as a result of exposing himself to LDS proselytization.
Well, that story is internally inconsistent. I can imagine possibly an inexperienced priest with not much sparing practice carelessly saying “you or us.” A great doctor–it hurts my cheeks to laugh so hard.

However, since they claim that dichotomy, it is real easy to just accept it for the sake of argument and show that the whole idea Christ lost his church on this continent or the other is beyond obsurd. And while we’re at it, there must be some level on which that absurdity puts a dent in the armor of the Protestantism.
 
Well, that story is internally inconsistent. I can imagine possibly an inexperienced priest with not much sparing practice carelessly saying “you or us.” A great doctor–it hurts my cheeks to laugh so hard.

However, since they claim that dichotomy, it is real easy to just accept it for the sake of argument and show that the whole idea Christ lost his church on this continent or the other is beyond obsurd. And while we’re at it, there must be some level on which that absurdity puts a dent in the armor of the Protestantism.
The tales inconsistencies aside what you describe is a contemporary LDS bishop retelling this tale as his own experience. To me this is him lying plain and simple, he gave you no names, not of the priest, the Catholic church he was affiliated with, the location this took place. He gave you nothing but a tale told by others, claiming it happened to him. A lot like Paul H. Dunn who told outright lies about his life in order to create “faith promoting” stories. It’s an LDS thing.
 
The tales inconsistencies aside what you describe is a contemporary LDS bishop retelling this tale as his own experience. To me this is him lying plain and simple, he gave you no names, not of the priest, the Catholic church he was affiliated with, the location this took place. He gave you nothing but a tale told by others, claiming it happened to him. A lot like Paul H. Dunn who told outright lies about his life in order to create “faith promoting” stories. It’s an LDS thing.
Not only is he Mormon, but he is a freight broker. There simply has never been an honest man who brokers freight. So it’s a for-gone conclusion he was lying. It’s tangential, but I ignore everything these people say on work orders until it’s in writing. 90% of the conversations I have with freight brokers include a transparent case of deception–I talk with scads of these guys every week.

Another big lie mormons tell is how they were persecuted for their faith. In fact, Joseph smith was promoting more than just another testement and polygamy. He was telling the church to buy all the land in MO, and he had formed an independent militia. The revolutionary war at that time was fresh in history and suffrage was on the basis of land ownership. Accordingly the government saw the LDS movement as a seditious movement much like the Feds would have characterized the David Koresh movement in the 90s. Joseph smith wasn’t killed as a martyr for his religion. He was killed with a gun in his hand fighting for Zionism. I travel to Utah a lot as a commercial driver. In rural Utah non-LDS churches are unusual. Given the historical popularity of protestantism and evangelicalism in the rest of the country, I see only one plausible explanation–religious suppression.
 
@Mammoths, you are seeing it right. Sorry to assume that was your comment. Mormonism is a lie.
 
What I often see in this forum is people mistaking criticism of the belief with criticism of its adherents. They are two different things.

Mormonism is not even close to Catholicism. Mormonism does not believe in the Trinity which is the cornerstone of Christianity. Catholics believe that there is no marriage in heaven, Mormons believe not only in marriage in heaven but polygamy is heavenly marriage. So many differences that the Vatican has concluded that Mormons do not have a valid Christian baptism unlike other Christian denominations.
 
What I often see in this forum is people mistaking criticism of the belief with criticism of its adherents. They are two different things.

Mormonism is not even close to Catholicism. Mormonism does not believe in the Trinity which is the cornerstone of Christianity. Catholics believe that there is no marriage in heaven, Mormons believe not only in marriage in heaven but polygamy is heavenly marriage. So many differences that the Vatican has concluded that Mormons do not have a valid Christian baptism unlike other Christian denominations.
The LDS are no more Christian than Hindus, the Jews, or Islam, etc… While people of all faiths may be good people and behave in what may be called a Christian manner, it does not make them Christian.

In my life I’ve run into a few LDS who were not good people, but most of them were fine people.
 
What I often see in this forum is people mistaking criticism of the belief with criticism of its adherents. They are two different things.

Mormonism is not even close to Catholicism. Mormonism does not believe in the Trinity which is the cornerstone of Christianity. Catholics believe that there is no marriage in heaven, Mormons believe not only in marriage in heaven but polygamy is heavenly marriage. So many differences that the Vatican has concluded that Mormons do not have a valid Christian baptism unlike other Christian denominations.
Precisely. It is very hard for most people to distinguish between the following:

“sir, your religion is lying to you.”

“You horrible person.”

As I said, I like every Mormon I have ever met. In fact, I have even invited one family to vacation with mine because they are the sort of people you like to be around. But their religion is false and counterfeit–plain as day.
 
In a theological sense the two are on completely different sides of the “Christian umbrella”, however can’t we at least agree that we do share common ground on ethical and moral beliefs, and also the church structure is similar. I am Catholic but I have a few Mormon friends and although I don’t agree with anything of their beliefs, I have been to Mormon Church services and they really are amazing and welcoming people. In fact I feel like the people in Mormon churches are much more friendly than when I wall into a Catholic Church where a lot of times people seem to be reserved and even get upset if you are sitting in their pew they usually sit in. All I am saying is we should not judge people as bad just because they have views which are basically heretical to the Catholic Church and for that matter the majority of Churches, I think we should focus more on our similarities and show love like Christ would. We do both love Jesus dearly. I only bring this up because I have noticed some anti Mormon rhetoric quite often on this page. And I just want to say I don’t care of you are Catholic, Orthodox, Anglican, Protestant, Mormon, or even Jehovahs Witnesses… We all love Christ and just have a different view of Christ’s truth.
Hello,
I am a LDS. I am also a former Catholic. While I am well aware of differences, I see great similarities as well.
Ordained priesthood.
Claims to authority.
Sacraments : LDS have solid parallels for 6/7 Catholic Sacraments and a weak parallel for reconciliation. We are even closer after Vatican 2 restored the proper (IMO) emphasis upon Extreme Unction.
Similar resistance to societies slide. Catholics are better here if judged by binding doctrine IMO, but both of us are better than most Evangelical congregations.

There are many reasons I am a LDS and some reasons I am not a Catholic, but I would be at reconciliation in less than 24 hours if I all of the sudden discovered my church was not at all what I think it is. I do not recognize the church former Mormons here left (and they do not recognize things I see as part of Catholicism)

As I think about it. In real life there is far more wonderful things present in both our faiths than is evident in the bowels of the Internet that is our religious dialogue.
Charity, TOm
 
Another problem is that if we admit to the idea that the church was abandoned by God and then restored, how do we know that it won’t happen again? That the “restored” church won’t be again lost?

This would imply a fickle God.
I’ve heard something similar on more than one occasion from Jewish folks, opining about Christianity. (They don’t talk about churches, of course.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top