Is Christ Really Equal To The Father?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zadeth
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What was the purpose in making them difficult to understand? Why wouldn’t it be better to have clearcut and easy to understand teachings?
The answer is here: Matthew 13:11-17 (cf. Matthew 13:34-35; Luke 8:10). Jesus said that “Many are called, but few are chosen.” Jesus wanted people to establish a personal relationship with him and not get all of their knowledge from books. I’ll let it go at this simplistic answer because there are already quite a few excellent answers here.
 
The Bible explains God would you say the Bible is in error or simply lying? Probably not… Maybe you just misunderstanding the scriptures or maybe I am… But that’s why we discussing this so to understand why our beliefs differ…

You saying Jesus wasn’t created… But if I show you a verse in the Bible that shows he was would you believe? Or would you ignore that verse because you know it doesn’t agree with your beliefs…
John 17:3 says - And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent."
Another Bible says - “This means everlasting life, their coming to know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent, Jesus Christ.”
Getting to know God isn’t a mystery… If we can get to know God and Jesus it would mean everlasting life for us
John 17:11 “And now I will no longer be in the world, but they are in the world, while I am coming to you. Holy Father, keep them in your name that you have given me, so that they may be one just as we are.”

Did the Father send the Son? Yes. Jesus is God Incarnate; fully divine and fully human. Did the Son send the Holy Spirit? Yes. Is the Holy Spirit God? Yes. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are all persons in God.
 
John 17:11 “And now I will no longer be in the world, but they are in the world, while I am coming to you. Holy Father, keep them in your name that you have given me, so that they may be one just as we are.”

Did the Father send the Son? Yes. Jesus is God Incarnate; fully divine and fully human. Did the Son send the Holy Spirit? Yes. Is the Holy Spirit God? Yes. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are all persons in God.
Did the Father send the Son, or did the Son come of his own accord? It’s difficult to say because we don’t know Jesus’ exact words. Sometimes he says the Father sent him, and sometimes he says he came.

Maybe you can shed some light on this problem. Even well-known biblical scholars grapple with it.
 
John 17:11 “And now I will no longer be in the world, but they are in the world, while I am coming to you. Holy Father, keep them in your name that you have given me, so that they may be one just as we are.”

Did the Father send the Son? Yes. Jesus is God Incarnate; fully divine and fully human. Did the Son send the Holy Spirit? Yes. Is the Holy Spirit God? Yes. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are all persons in God.
Jesus says so that they may be one just as we are… Does that mean they are equal and that we will be equal with them? The verse most trinitarians use always only speaks about God and Jesus… Where is the third person in John 17:11?..but that’s going off topic… Let’s stick to it… Is Jesus equal to God
 
Is Jesus equal to God
Matthew 28:19 - Go, therefore,* and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit,

Is not the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit the name of God?
 
There are plenty of things that you would find as part of your faith, things that you and Catholics and others may even agree on, that are still mysterious and not fully understood. But that does not mean we cannot know anything about them or that they contradict reason. Saying that the Trinity is a mystery of mysterious does not mean it is against reason or cannot be understood. The Catechism of the Catholic Church says, “The Trinity is a mystery of faith in the strict sense, one of the ‘mysteries that are hidden in God, which can never be known unless they are revealed by God’” (234). In this sense, any aspect of God’s nature is a mystery, since it deals with His inner life and being.

home.earthlink.net/~mysticalrose/trinity.html
When prophets of old like Moses and Noah an them believed in God did they ever confess that they didn’t understand him or that understanding him is a mystery? What about the people who believe in God in the NT, do you think that God was a mystery to them? Back then they didn’t even have the Bible yet the could understand God, who he was, what’s his name etc etc… Yet today we are privileged to have the Bible but yet we say God’s a mystery, do you not think God would reveal himself by means of his word the Bible that we can get to know God, who he is, what his name is, how he deals with people, what he dislikes and likes etc etc… Every other faith believes in God and can explain there God except those who believe in the trinity God. I think God has given us enough information in the Bible for us to understand him. But you say explaining or understanding the trinity is a mystery but you can easily say Jesus and God is equal. Answer me one question - if Jesus was created is it possible that he can be equal to God?
 
Jesus says so that they may be one just as we are… Does that mean they are equal and that we will be equal with them? The verse most trinitarians use always only speaks about God and Jesus… Where is the third person in John 17:11?..but that’s going off topic… Let’s stick to it… Is Jesus equal to God
No we will never be equal to them. They are 1 GOD. We on the other hand are created persons. What we can achieve though in being one is to share the divine life freely given to us By GOD the father through the sacrifice of Jesus, we become partakers of the divine life.

That is we can enter Heaven and LIVE next to GOD, see HIM like we could not before.
The trinity is manifestly declared in the Scriptures, we see that GOD unveils the mystery of Himself little by little from the Old Testament through the New Testament. It is problematic to yank 1 verse or another, as we see that GOD unveils and expands our knowledge as we mature and grow.

 
No we will never be equal to them. They are 1 GOD. We on the other hand are created persons. What we can achieve though in being one is to share the divine life freely given to us By GOD the father through the sacrifice of Jesus, we become partakers of the divine life.

That is we can enter Heaven and LIVE next to GOD, see HIM like we could not before.
The trinity is manifestly declared in the Scriptures, we see that GOD unveils the mystery of Himself little by little from the Old Testament through the New Testament. It is problematic to yank 1 verse or another, as we see that GOD unveils and expands our knowledge as we mature and grow.

Okay… I’ll ask you the same question then… It is believed that Jesus and God is one in the sense that they are equal, correct me if I’m wrong… So my question to you to would be that if Jesus was created by God can he be equal to God?
 
Okay… I’ll ask you the same question then… It is believed that Jesus and God is one in the sense that they are equal, correct me if I’m wrong… So my question to you to would be that if Jesus was created by God can he be equal to God?
We are not divine, so we can never be the equal of God.

God the Son was not created; he was begotten. He (and the Holy Spirit) have co-existed from all eternity with God the Father. Christ is God’s Word. The Gospel of John opens with the words, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

Although the Trinity is the central mystery of the Roman Catholic faith, it is a mystery, as others have explained. That means, with our limited human knowledge, we cannot fully comprehend it until such time as God himself desires to reveal it to us.

If you want to read a book written for the layman on the Trinity that is still quite comprehensive, I recommend Fr. Michael Gaitley’s The One Thing is Three. He writes for the average person who just wants to know more, but he doesn’t write down to his readers, either.
 
We are not divine, so we can never be the equal of God.

God the Son was not created; he was begotten. He (and the Holy Spirit) have co-existed from all eternity with God the Father. Christ is God’s Word. The Gospel of John opens with the words, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
See you using your own understanding of what you think is right that’s man made ideology, you have no scriptural bases to support that belief… Your belief that Jesus wasn’t created contradicts what the Bible says… The Bible answers that question… Try to explain this verse for me at colossians 1:15 which says - “He (Jesus) is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation,”
Based on that verse would you still say Jesus was not created? How can Jesus be the firstborn if he is from eternity meaning he was never born… Read that whole chapter to understand the context.
The very next verse Paul goes on to explain what has been created, verse 16 says - "because by means of him (Jesus) all other things were created in the heavens and on the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All other things have been created through him (Jesus) and for him (Jesus).

John 1:1 is very correct in the sense that Jesus was with God before anything else… Before the rest of creation took place, that’s why Jesus is referred to the only begotten son of God because he was the only one created directly from God, all the other sons of God like the angels is not only begotten because they were created through Jesus.
 
See you using your own understanding of what you think is right that’s man made ideology, you have no scriptural bases to support that belief… Your belief that Jesus wasn’t created contradicts what the Bible says… The Bible answers that question… Try to explain this verse for me at colossians 1:15 which says - “He (Jesus) is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation,”
Based on that verse would you still say Jesus was not created? How can Jesus be the firstborn if he is from eternity meaning he was never born… Read that whole chapter to understand the context.
The very next verse Paul goes on to explain what has been created, verse 16 says - "because by means of him (Jesus) all other things were created in the heavens and on the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All other things have been created through him (Jesus) and for him (Jesus).

John 1:1 is very correct in the sense that Jesus was with God before anything else… Before the rest of creation took place, that’s why Jesus is referred to the only begotten son of God because he was the only one created directly from God, all the other sons of God like the angels is not only begotten because they were created through Jesus.
This explains it better than I would:

bible.org/seriespage/3-son-god-begotten-not-made

Please take special note of this:

“If Jesus is said to be the begotten Son of God (using the figure from human language to make the point), then Jesus has the same nature as the Father. If Jesus has the same nature as God the Father, then Jesus is divine and eternal as well. If he is eternally God, then there was never a time he was literally begotten–which is why we know the language is figurative to describe his nature, and not his beginning. To call Jesus ‘the only begotten Son’ means that he is fully divine and eternal. He is God the Son.”

Humans are limited by language; God is not.

My scriptural basis to back up what I wrote in the previous post is John 1:1.
 
Did the Father send the Son, or did the Son come of his own accord? It’s difficult to say because we don’t know Jesus’ exact words. Sometimes he says the Father sent him, and sometimes he says he came.

Maybe you can shed some light on this problem. Even well-known biblical scholars grapple with it.
I am not an Associate Professor of Theology but my understanding is that God was, is, and always will be. He is without creation. Jesus, the second person in the Holy Trinity, is God and has all the nature of God so Christ is also without creation.

Did God the Father send the Spirit to Mary so that she could bear the Son of God? Yes. By Mary’s fiat, God was Incarnate: God become (the perfect) Man.

Is the Holy Spirit God? Yes but God did NOT create God. The Father, Son, and Spirit all have the same divine nature. If we tried to describe how God Incarnated, we’d fall short of an accurate description. When the Spirit inspires the writers of the Bible to record the event, how do you think they might have responded?

From what little I know of the Gospels, they were written in the first century by different people in different places and at different times. I believe Mark’s version came out first followed by Matthew’s and Luke’s then John’s. In the end, the Gospel is more than a literary collection to be studied and debate; they point to how we’re to live so we can follow Christ. 👍
 
Jesus says so that they may be one just as we are… Does that mean they are equal and that we will be equal with them? The verse most trinitarians use always only speaks about God and Jesus… Where is the third person in John 17:11?..but that’s going off topic… Let’s stick to it… Is Jesus equal to God
Is Jesus equal to God? Yes because Jesus IS God. We will never be equal to God because we are creatures of God; we are created by God and the creation cannot equal the Creator.
 
Hey this is a interesting topic one that can go on forever… It’s also interesting to note that many people I speak to seem to believe in the trinity but yet they confess they do not understand it, as seen by some of the comments made on this thread too, this puts the question in my mind that how does one believe in something one can’t explain or understand? that’s called having blind faith… I know many who asked their church leaders to explain the trinity who replied by its a mystery… But if the trinity is a basis for our salvation then there’s no way it can be a mystery. But then again on the other hand many do confess to totally understand the trinity… So I have a question I want them to help me understand…
John 3:16 says - “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.”
Please explain what the term “only begotten Son” means?

Anything that is “begotten”, is something that at one time did not exist and then was brought into existence. Am I right when I say that? If you agree to that then Jesus can’t be considered equal to God… There’s also no scripture in the Bible that shows Jesus existed from eternity, so where does that belief come from?
When did God ever become Man before or since? Jesus is the Word and He was with God from the beginning and the Word was God (at least in the Bible we Catholics use.) So Jesus was with God before God created the world because He is God. Begotten is not created.
 
See you using your own understanding of what you think is right that’s man made ideology, you have no scriptural bases to support that belief… Your belief that Jesus wasn’t created contradicts what the Bible says… The Bible answers that question… Try to explain this verse for me at colossians 1:15 which says - “He (Jesus) is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation,”
Based on that verse would you still say Jesus was not created? How can Jesus be the firstborn if he is from eternity meaning he was never born… Read that whole chapter to understand the context.
The very next verse Paul goes on to explain what has been created, verse 16 says - "because by means of him (Jesus) all other things were created in the heavens and on the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All other things have been created through him (Jesus) and for him (Jesus).

John 1:1 is very correct in the sense that Jesus was with God before anything else… Before the rest of creation took place, that’s why Jesus is referred to the only begotten son of God because he was the only one created directly from God, all the other sons of God like the angels is not only begotten because they were created through Jesus.
Firstborn refers to the best of the best not necessarily the first in chronological order. This is the challenge when reading from ancient script; translations to modern language don’t always come out accurate.

BTW I don’t believe angels are “sons of God”. They are heavenly creatures but are not the same as us or God.
 
This explains it better than I would:

bible.org/seriespage/3-son-god-begotten-not-made

Please take special note of this:

“If Jesus is said to be the begotten Son of God (using the figure from human language to make the point), then Jesus has the same nature as the Father. If Jesus has the same nature as God the Father, then Jesus is divine and eternal as well. If he is eternally God, then there was never a time he was literally begotten–which is why we know the language is figurative to describe his nature, and not his beginning. To call Jesus ‘the only begotten Son’ means that he is fully divine and eternal. He is God the Son.”

Humans are limited by language; God is not.
Lily read my previous post… Jesus was created, to deny what Colossians 1:15 says means that you ignoring the fact that Jesus was created or ignoring what the Bible says on this matter… In that link under begotten it says about and I quote ‘To call Jesus “the only begotten Son” means that he is fully divine and eternal. He is God the Son. This is why the creed says that Jesus was “begotten, not made.” Why? Because he is of one substance with the Father.’
He says Jesus was not made but would you not say that what is said there contradicts what colossians 1:15 says that “his the firstborn of all creation”? There’s also no where in the Bible where Jesus is refered to as “God the son” but always as the “Son of God”… Again that’s not biblical, but man made ideologies
 
I am not an Associate Professor of Theology but my understanding is that God was, is, and always will be. He is without creation. Jesus, the second person in the Holy Trinity, is God and has all the nature of God so Christ is also without creation.

Did God the Father send the Spirit to Mary so that she could bear the Son of God? Yes. By Mary’s fiat, God was Incarnate: God become (the perfect) Man.

Is the Holy Spirit God? Yes but God did NOT create God. The Father, Son, and Spirit all have the same divine nature. If we tried to describe how God Incarnated, we’d fall short of an accurate description. When the Spirit inspires the writers of the Bible to record the event, how do you think they might have responded?

From what little I know of the Gospels, they were written in the first century by different people in different places and at different times. I believe Mark’s version came out first followed by Matthew’s and Luke’s then John’s. In the end, the Gospel is more than a literary collection to be studied and debate; they point to how we’re to live so we can follow Christ. 👍
I ask the question because while I was a student some of my professors would give ambiguous answers, whereas some of the students were very clear. I guess it’s a case of “many are called, but few are chosen.” Sometimes the student answers surpassed the professor answers.

At times Jesus makes the statement that he “was sent,” and at other times he will say, “I came…”. They are not mutually exclusive, of course, and they are probably a defect of translation. It’s just something I find curious and Gerald O’Collins, SJ discusses it in his book, Jesus: A Portrait. I am an admirer of Father O’Collins’ writing and have been reading that book.

It’s very difficult to know exactly what Jesus said because the Gospel writers were not writing a biography, as you know, but were recording what they thought the Church should know about Jesus. (And of course they were writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.) No matter who the authors were, I do believe they obtained their material from eyewitnesses, and that the Gospel of John was written by the Beloved Disciple himself. I don’t find contradictions problematic because eyewitness testimony always differs from person to person in the details.

There are just little things that I wonder about, and so far, no one has been able to answer.
 
Lily read my previous post… Jesus was created, to deny what Colossians 1:15 says means that you ignoring the fact that Jesus was created or ignoring what the Bible says on this matter… In that link under begotten it says about and I quote ‘To call Jesus “the only begotten Son” means that he is fully divine and eternal. He is God the Son. This is why the creed says that Jesus was “begotten, not made.” Why? Because he is of one substance with the Father.’
He says Jesus was not made but would you not say that what is said there contradicts what colossians 1:15 says that “his the firstborn of all creation”? There’s also no where in the Bible where Jesus is refered to as “God the son” but always as the “Son of God”… Again that’s not biblical, but man made ideologies
Jesus is the equal of God the Father:

gotquestions.org/Jesus-first-born.html
 
I ask the question because while I was a student some of my professors would give ambiguous answers, whereas some of the students were very clear. I guess it’s a case of “many are called, but few are chosen.” Sometimes the student answers surpassed the professor answers.

At times Jesus makes the statement that he “was sent,” and at other times he will say, “I came…”. They are not mutually exclusive, of course, and they are probably a defect of translation. It’s just something I find curious and Gerald O’Collins, SJ discusses it in his book, Jesus: A Portrait. I am an admirer of Father O’Collins’ writing and have been reading that book.

It’s very difficult to know exactly what Jesus said because the Gospel writers were not writing a biography, as you know, but were recording what they thought the Church should know about Jesus. (And of course they were writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.) No matter who the authors were, I do believe they obtained their material from eyewitnesses, and that the Gospel of John was written by the Beloved Disciple himself. I don’t find contradictions problematic because eyewitness testimony always differs from person to person in the details.

There are just little things that I wonder about, and so far, no one has been able to answer.
God will provide all the answers when we face Him. I pray that I’m found worthy enough and will meet you there! God Bless you.👍
 
Firstborn refers to the best of the best not necessarily the first in chronological order. This is the challenge when reading from ancient script; translations to modern language don’t always come out accurate.

BTW I don’t believe angels are “sons of God”. They are heavenly creatures but are not the same as us or God.
I think the scriptures is quite clear on what firstborn means… Unless you want me to give you another verse as more evidence… Okay let’s do that, read Revelation 3:14 which says - “To the angel of the congregation in La·o·di·cea write: These are the things that the Amen says, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation by God."
Again Jesus is said to be the beginning of God’s creation… But I don’t like jumping verses hence I only used colossians 1:15, only reason I used another verse was to show you how consistent the Bible is with this teaching that Jesus was created.

You said you don’t believe angels are sons of God even though God refers to them as sons?
Genesis 6:2 - “the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose.”
You still don’t believe? It is written
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top