S
Sirach2
Guest
I had not intended to continue this conversation, but it just occurred to me, as I read back through the thread, that you keep trying to focus everyone on John 10:30,. Please note that I never isolated that scripture in our discussion. It was primarily to John 10:38 that I referred, and you have not responded, except to continually challenge others to interpret John 10:30, here and here. That must be the JW standard opening to catch others.You not looking at the context of John 10:30.
I suggest that you read the chapter please before saying what it means.
In fact, I gave an entire post of scriptures here, and you have not responded to them, either. In addition, I provided the interpretation for your difficulty in reconciling John 14:20 and 17:21 (below). Again, no response.
There is another sense of oneness, a true oneness in the spirit, not necessarily in the body. It is that sense that Jesus was referring to in Jn. 17:21. Were that not true, how else might one interpret this oneness when Jesus identifies with the very ones Saul was persecuting? It is to misconstrue the truth of Jesus’ Divinity by using Jesus’ identification and oneness with His mystical Body - they have two different meanings.
Acts 9:3. Now as Saul was going along and approaching Damascus, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. 4. He fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute Me?” 5. He asked, “Who are you, Lord?” The reply came, “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.”
Let me just add one more scripture to substantiate Paul’s experience of “persecuting Jesus”. Mt. 25:40, “Verily I say unto you, whatsoever you have done unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto Me.”
Jesus plainly spoke of His identification with those who do not recognize that He indwells His brethren, as He promised in John 14:23.
I’m not finding any openness to discussion from you, since you revert back only to those scriptures that are part of the JW arsenal, rather than address the truths others provided for your consideration of our faith. And for that reason, I concluded that you are not open.