This is something of a contradiction.
I wouldnât say that⌠Not the physical part anyway. The soul and the memory and the personality would not transfer.
Well, there is the passage in Revelation about the âimageâ of the beast and how the second beast compels the people of the world to worship it. Often this passage is seen as parallel to Nebuchadnezzarâs great statue and how he forced the world to bow down to it except the three hebrew young men wouldnât. Now in this modern age Iâve pondered the possibility that it is a clone. However, that being said, the Church doesnât have an official position on it, and so I would hesitate to readily accept what has not been defined by the church. Donât speculate too much, because there are already hundreds if not thousands of interpretations, each boasting that they alone are inspired by the Holy Spirit on this issue.Human CloningâŚ
Thatâs a nightmere. I hate to say this but⌠You can pass all the laws in the world against it and and have all the moral indignation you can muster against it, but the fact isâŚnothing can stop it from happening and you can be absolutely sure of that. Athiestic social engineers value science over faith and to them that is an absolute. THEY WILL DO IT, IF THEY HAVENâT ALREADY.
Consider this⌠if they can clone a sheep⌠a horse, a cat and a cow, anything mammal⌠than guess what⌠they can clone a âone of usâ too. And⌠if they canât now,⌠they will.
You know how�?? They will do it clandestinely ⌠under cover.
Think about that. Whoâs to say that they havenât done so alreadyâŚ??? HummmâŚ??? Comment. anybodyâŚ?
I am for real here⌠donât laugh this offâŚ
Can you suggest to me anything in scripture that might suggest that the âAnti-Christâ could be a cloneâŚ?
Can you say âsign of the timesââŚ???
Imagine if some socialist anthrpoplogist finds a way to dig up a sample of King Nebuchadnezzarâs DNA and they clone up a new copy of himâŚ???
It sounds like science fiction⌠but you know what�?? it makes my skin crawl and this should not be passed off as insignificant.
My thoughts on human cloning for what theyâre worth.
A close SHOULD have human rights, but if they are created, Iâm sure the scientists will manage somehow to get them viewed as non-humans.
Whyâs that? away from the sci fi / fantasy world, this is a no-brainer. that child growing up is probably going to be most protected kid ever.
I think you are looking at the possibilities of the future world with an optimistic lense. Would you ever guess, if you didnât see it yourself, that they would decide children in the womb arenât human? Or that the hundreds of thousands of frozen embryos in IVF factories are not human? To suggest that the world is not evil enough to use cloning to an evil end is to ignore history.
TrueâŚthe chances are if we ever create human clones. Itâll be for our use & abuse:
I like sci fi. I like history. but I can tell the difference between the two. abortion and infanticide have a history of thousands of years, its not surprising to me that abortion continues in modern days. in recent history, slavery was outlawed in most of the world.
Thank youâŚ
You overlook the âeasyâ way they will have around this that is already ACLU approved. Simply develop a way to scramble the brain of the cloned fetus in the womb while the fetus is still legally the mere chattle property of the mother. This will probably be done in the 8th month of pregnancy, when the organs are all substantially formed. After birth, the organism will be classified as âsubhumanâ for lack of adequate brain function to qualify as a âpersonâ and the organs can be harvested.
like I said, I enjoy reading sci fi. I donât confuse it with reality.
Iâm not sure why youâre repeating that, because it is irrelevant to the discussion. sci-fi and reality are not mutually exclusive, and things in each can be found in both.
Then you miss the point. The best sci-fi isnât about the future, itâs commentary on the present.