Is Darwin's Theory of Evolution True? Part 4.0

[Techno2000]

Yes, for over four and a half billion years the world was completely devoid of birds.

Yeah… the clock started over four and a half billion years ago …And I ain’t seeing nothing evolving yet.

 

[edwest211]

But… I’ve got pictures! :0 :0

 

[Techno2000]

But… I’ve got pictures! :0 :0

I’m waiting for somebody to tell me evolution doesn’t work that way.

 

[edwest211]

OK. It was a prank. Someone wrote ‘4 billion years old’ on the back. I think they were trying to say something about my age.

 

[Techno2000]

OK. It was a prank. Someone wrote ‘4 billion years old’ on the back. I think they were trying to say something about my age.

You know there’s been a lot of bullets flying around lately, shouldn’t we be starting to evolve bullet resistant skin ?

 

[Glark]

How many birds do you know with teeth and a bony tail? Archaeopteryx has both. Later birds lost the bony tail, but kept the teeth for a time. Later still they lost the teeth as well. You do realise that feathered dinosaurs also had teeth and a bony tail, but lacked wings, that had feathered forelimbs instead.

I’ll chew on that.

Archaeopteryx is a transitional; it shows characteristics from two related groups: feathers and flight from the birds, teeth and a bony tail from the dinosaurs.

The platypus must be a transitional too.

 

[Glark]

Techno the party-pooper

 

[Glark]

Question: Give an example of a useless, pointless story (theory that can’t be tested)? Answer: Creationism!

The (rather obvious) difference between creationism and evolutionism is that creationism doesn’t claim to be science. The endless procession of untestable theories that evolutionism produces is as irrelevant to science as Genesis.

 

[Glark]

Show me where, exactly, the red band in a rainbow turns to orange, and you’ll have your answer.

Is it true what evolutionists say about rainbows, that there are pots of gold at the ends?

 

[Glark]

Way too many of the science articles are just storytelling.

Bedtime stories for atheists masquerading as science.

 

[Glark]

There are chickens with teeth.

Another party pooper.

 

[Glark]

How many birds do you know with teeth

I once dated a bird called Rhonda and she had teeth - six of them. We broke up coz she reckoned I was a no-good, evolution-denying, fundamentalist fool. Her loss.

 

[Glark]

We could easily say - “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution”

Or we could say, more correctly - “Nothing in Atheism Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution”.

 

[Glark]

“We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs” - Richard Lewontin

Translation: “We atheists would rather believe in science-fiction than believe in God”.

 

[Glark]

Nice quote, but science isn’t a religion, and it does not require dogma.

Evolutionary science - and the other strands of science it affects - are the exception.

 

[Glark]

Nobody is dogmatic about evolution

LOL!!! You can’t be serious!

 

[Glark]

This fossil confirms it - frogs evolved from tadpoles.

 

[Glark]

Now the NCSE is pitching climate change in addition to evolution to our kids. No dissent allowed

The similarities are disturbing. Satan loves how science has the power to deceive and mislead. Tell lies often enough and people will start to believe them.

 

[Glark]

Eve coming from Adam is a problem.

Theistic evolutionists get around this by adhering to the First Pillar of Theistic Evolution: Twist, distort and allergorise Scripture to suit; if this fails, simply ignore it.

 

[Glark]

.I speculate the toucan came from the woodpecker,because they both have hard beaks.And the kingfisher morphed from ducks because they both like water.

I couldn’t help but notice the beauty of your logic. You would make a very excellent evolutionary biologist.