Is Darwin's Theory of Evolution True? Part 4.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Techno2000
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And many scientist were once Christian until they bought into Darwinism.

And some looked into Darwinism and found how weak it is and found design to be a better explanation.

And so what. Science began when Catholics found the world to be intelligible and worthy of study.

I see evolution as simply not the best explanation. No religion needed.
 
They probably have common ancestors like dogs have wolves.

When they become isolated and cannot mate that is called - loss of function. We can classify them as another species, but that does nothing for macro evolutionary claims. It supports genetic entropy.
 
Last edited:
benjamin1973 said:
Do you think God designed tigers and lions with the intent that we could make ligers for the entertainment of zoo-goers?

Or is it perhaps possible that they have common ancestors, but have not yet drifted far apart genetically that they cannot mate?
Click to expand...
No, I think that man messing around with God’s creation can produce odd results.

Perhaps God put these in place so man could study it and learn something he otherwise would never have considered.
 
No religion is required to see actual design as opposed to the ‘illusion of design.’ A flower is not designed? Just answer honestly without regard to any preconception.
 
Um. . . when two populations are no longer a genetic match, so that they cannot produce viable offspring, that’s pretty much the definition of species differentiation.
 
. . . or perhaps they are close enough genetically that the sperm from one, when it reaches the egg of another, can produce a living creature. But not close enough that the resultant hybrid can reproduce successfully?

Nah. . . that would be crazy, right?
 
Fine. Look at the features of animals, and explain any of them.

So far as I can see, ID is not an explanation at all. It’s a refusal to explain, on the grounds that any explanation not already in the Bible is a waste of time.

“Daddy, why do we have a blind spot?”
Evolution: Well, Jimmy, it has to do with the way the eye evolved as an extension of the brain, and the way the nerves were oriented.
ID: Well, Jimmy, God deliberately designed the eye to have a blind spot, because fill in ridiculous explanation here
 
Last edited:
How many separate times did legs evolve in creatures?
Bugs, for instance, have legs, but an entirely different leg structure than, say, mammals. It may have been many different times.
 
Last edited:
Ligers never had the ability to reproduce with other ligers. What are you talking about?
 
“may have been” is conjecture. Today, anyone with the right knowledge and equipment could run a comparison.
 
The potentiality of the features is front loaded right from the beginning.

There are over 40 molecular machines that challenge Darwinism. Journal Biological Chemistry - “Molecular machines, although it may often seem so, are not made with a blueprint at hand. Yet, biochemists and molecular biologists (and many scientists of other disciplines) are used to thinking as an engineer, more precisely a reverse engineer. But there are no blueprints … ‘Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution’: we know that Dobzhansky (1973) must be right. But our mind, despite being a product of tinkering itself strangely wants us to think like engineers.”
 
Mules can’t reproduce either. So?

I was replying to your statement - [Um. . . when two populations are no longer a genetic match, so that they cannot produce viable offspring, that’s pretty much the definition of species differentiation.]
 
Last edited:
You must realize even a bad design is still designed right?

To understand design one must know the mind and intent of the designer.

Claimed bad design is not an argument against the existence of design.
 
“Bioinformatics… is an interdisciplinary field that develops methods and software tools for understanding biological data. As an interdisciplinary field of science, bioinformatics combines Computer Science, Biology, Mathematics, and Engineering to analyze and interpret biological data.”

They have no choice but “to think like engineers”… “more precisely a reverse engineer.”
 
It’s hard to get all the information, though.
I think I’ve seen that it was 17 different times, but I am not sure about that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top