S
StrawberryJam
Guest
Hasn’t this thread strayed off topic from the OP?
1 Timothy 5:23I was given some thoughtful and life changing advice many years ago from a decent Irish-Catholic Priest in Jacksonville, Florida. He finished blessing a crucifix for me, then asked if there was anything at all troubling me. I was just beginning my “return” walk with Christ and was confused that the local politicians, of Baptist denomination, had succeeded in “temporarily” halting “Happy Hour”. Was it wrong to drink? He chuckled and said he knew of many who speak of temperance and then go home to snip off a bottle in the closet.
“EVIL does NOT reside in the bottle”, he calmly said, “EVIL resides in the heart”.
“Drink too much and you may let it out and end up doing something that you will live to regret for the rest of your days”.
“Moderation is the key”, he said.
As Father Groeshel aptly stated once, “we must beware of “scupulosity”…in other words, looking for sin where it may not be”.
There is a certain amount that is cultural/environmental. My family is a hard drinking lot of French Acadian Nova Scotians. Alcohol and partying is so much part of the lifestyle that it cannot be possible that so many people are “diseased.” I’ve seen much the same thing with many Irish families I know in Boston. It is not a disease. Our free will is what decides to delve into drunkeness as a habit. I believe what you are saying is that once alcoholism sets in, you lose your free will. Saying its a disease takes some the onus of drunkeness being a sin.Actually, I can deny the existence of free will in this matter. Addiction by definition is the loss of free will. It is complex in the neurochemistry, but one of the more recent discoveries is that addiction is not rooted in the part of the brain that thinks, makes choices, prays, etc., but rather in a non-thinking, only-care-about-survival part. It is hard to understand perhaps because you can choose to pick up a beer or not, but an alcoholic can’t, any more than a kid with Tourettes can choose. The science is quite clear: addiction is not LIKE a disease such as cancer or diabetes, it IS a disease.
=EphelDuath Regarding the marriage at Cana, where Christ transformed water into wine:
Our Blessed Lord never indorced drunkeness!Seems as if the Lord was alright with the wedding guests becoming intoxicated. Can somebody clarify, or am I misunderstanding this passage?
Ok, can we revisit a few points here?Our Blessed Lord never indorced drunkeness!
Keep in mind they drank wine like many of us drink coffee. Did some abuse it certainly!
Drunkeness is always a sin and often a Mortal sin.
Ok, can we revisit a few points here?
This is to vague to respond specifically. Why is this person “hanging with drunks”? is their a motive we need to aware of?
- If a Christian (say: a Fundy, because it’s easier to pick on a stereotype than a real person), is around a bunch of likkered-up people, is he by his very presence endorsing their activities? Especially if he refrains from demanding they repent?
The passage regarding the wedding at Cana makes clear that it was well understood that people drank to the point of having their judgment impaired “Most people serve the poor quality wine last because guests are so looped by then that they can’t tell the difference.” Bartenders can get sued for serving patrons who’ve already had enough. Or are we about to get an assertion that this “better wine” had no alcohol in it?
Very good.
- If drunkenness is always a sin, why does Proverbs 31 say (the DRB) :6 “Give strong drink to them that are sad; and wine to them that are grieved in mind:
Pro 31:7 Let them drink, and forget their want, and remember their sorrow no more”
Friend that the OT introduces the NT, and the NT fulfills and completes, even perfects the OT.'ve been “grieved” and I have had drink…but never enough of the latter to erase the former, so clearly we are talking about a whole moose-load of drink here.
No! If you are asking for some dispensation based on what one choose to understand as the teaching of Christ, would be heading in the wrong direction. Thruth remains truth reguardless of who accepts it and a lie is still a lie even if everyone chooses to believe it. What is right is RIGHT and what is wrong is WRONG!Is some balance in our theology in order?
This verse in Prov doesn’t give license for drunkeness, but to drinking. Moderation being the key, you can drink w/out getting drunkOk, can we revisit a few points here?
The passage regarding the wedding at Cana makes clear that it was well understood that people drank to the point of having their judgment impaired “Most people serve the poor quality wine last because guests are so looped by then that they can’t tell the difference.” Bartenders can get sued for serving patrons who’ve already had enough. Or are we about to get an assertion that this “better wine” had no alcohol in it?
- If a Christian (say: a Fundy, because it’s easier to pick on a stereotype than a real person), is around a bunch of likkered-up people, is he by his very presence endorsing their activities? Especially if he refrains from demanding they repent?
Is some balance in our theology in order?
- If drunkenness is always a sin, why does Proverbs 31 say (the DRB) :6 “Give strong drink to them that are sad; and wine to them that are grieved in mind:
Pro 31:7 Let them drink, and forget their want, and remember their sorrow no more”
I’ve been “grieved” and I have had drink…but never enough of the latter to erase the former, so clearly we are talking about a whole moose-load of drink here.
Yes, you can drink without getting drunk. But the verse in Proverbs indicates drinking with a specific goal, one not normally associated with moderation…This verse in Prov doesn’t give license for drunkeness, but to drinking. Moderation being the key, you can drink w/out getting drunk![]()
I think 1st, people would have to agree what the meaning of ‘drunkenness’ isYes, you can drink without getting drunk. But the verse in Proverbs indicates drinking with a specific goal, one not normally associated with moderation…
…which leads us back to the o-p: Is drunkenness acceptable in certain circumstances? Most people are pointing out that it is normally Not acceptable. But does this passage define one of those moments when it is?
EditI think 1st, people would have to agree what the meaning of ‘drunkenness’ is
tipsy, sure, why not, but sloshed, a no no
![]()
ahhh, brought back many a good memory :yyeess:The question is can drunkenness be acceptable in some circumstances and I will say yes and I think my guess is as good as yours.
I’ve been on hunting trips where after hunting from sun up to sun down, a group of about
8-10 men will gather firewood, start the camp fire and begin meal prep and cooking. The cases upon cases of beer that had been on ice now make their way into the hands of each hunter and from that point on, each person will drink until they go to bed or fall asleep in their chair.
During the time from dinner to sleep an unknowable number of stories are told and more times than not, people laugh until they cry and then repeat that action again and again.
The melancholy within the group will inevitably attempt to recall some sad moment in time and they are invited to be quiet or go to bed, as they are reminded that everyone could tell some sad tale but there is a time and a place for everything and this is neither the time nor the place.
I once had a Catholic priest who was a part of our foursome, say that sin is it’s own punishment and in the case of sitting by a campfire and drinking too many beers, daybreak and the inevitable hangover, reinforces that concept. Didn’t Noah experience something along these lines?
I think God may very well find our camping activities acceptable, even if a trip to the confessional is in order.
My personal experience is that some people can drink more than they should and still avoid damaging a close relationship with the Most Holy Trinity.
It certainly isn’t a good habit to get into, but deer hunting once a year could hardly be viewed as a habit.
If I’m wrong about this it wont be the first time and will only add to my Purgatory time that
I’ve earned through grave sin that was confessed but still requires justice.
May the Peace of Christ be with us all, always
JT
Thank you.Galatians 5:19-21
Now the works of the flesh are plain: fornication, impurity, licentiousness,
20 idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, anger, selfishness, dissension, party spirit,
21 envy, drunkenness, carousing, and the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
Scripture makes it plain, I think.
Yes but you’ll have to define drunkenness.Thank you.
I was wondering why it took so long before someone quoted that.
Of course drunkeness is a sin. Just look at all the illnesses it brings about morally and physically. One time is one time too many, just like one time idolatry, fornication or envy is one time too many…