M
MysticMissMisty
Guest
Oftentimes, many of us have occasion to both eat and drink for pleasure alone, even though we may not be hungry or thirsty or even though some food or drink may otherwise have little to no nutritional value.
Is eating and/or drinking without the purpose of doing so for nutritional reasons sinful? FOr instance, is having a glass of wine or beer in the evening even though one is not very thirsty simply to relax a little sinful, since it is not done also for purposes of thirst satiation? Is eating, say, sugary candy as a snakc, even when done in moderation, sinful since such things have little to no nutritional value? Is eating such things as white bread or certain condaments with littel to no nutritional value on other foods because they “taste good” sinful?
I ask this because one could make the comparison between this situation and having sex only for pleasure without marrying, being open to life, etc. Now, I realize that these things are, to some extent, on different moral levels (with this likely being more serious than the current topic under discussion), but I would argue the concept behind the two issues is similar – that is, that the primary purpose of eating and drinking is nutrition/satiation of thirst as is the primary function of intercourse the procreation of children. Sex was created for children as eating/drinking was created for nutrition/satiation. If the Church teaches that sex without procreation is sinful because its primary purpose has been thwarted/is unintended, would not the same apply insofar as eating and drinking? If not, why not?
Indeed, was it not the Angelic Doctor who stated as much in the Summa when he himself suggested similarly with regard to food?
Granted, this was one (though influential) man’s opinion (?). So, does the Church have any teaching (infallible or otherwise) on the topic at hand? If so, what is it? If not, what are your thoughts on this?
Thanks.
Is eating and/or drinking without the purpose of doing so for nutritional reasons sinful? FOr instance, is having a glass of wine or beer in the evening even though one is not very thirsty simply to relax a little sinful, since it is not done also for purposes of thirst satiation? Is eating, say, sugary candy as a snakc, even when done in moderation, sinful since such things have little to no nutritional value? Is eating such things as white bread or certain condaments with littel to no nutritional value on other foods because they “taste good” sinful?
I ask this because one could make the comparison between this situation and having sex only for pleasure without marrying, being open to life, etc. Now, I realize that these things are, to some extent, on different moral levels (with this likely being more serious than the current topic under discussion), but I would argue the concept behind the two issues is similar – that is, that the primary purpose of eating and drinking is nutrition/satiation of thirst as is the primary function of intercourse the procreation of children. Sex was created for children as eating/drinking was created for nutrition/satiation. If the Church teaches that sex without procreation is sinful because its primary purpose has been thwarted/is unintended, would not the same apply insofar as eating and drinking? If not, why not?
Indeed, was it not the Angelic Doctor who stated as much in the Summa when he himself suggested similarly with regard to food?
Granted, this was one (though influential) man’s opinion (?). So, does the Church have any teaching (infallible or otherwise) on the topic at hand? If so, what is it? If not, what are your thoughts on this?
Thanks.