Is Eve a trans?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DictatorCzar
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

DictatorCzar

Guest
I had a random thought, some other people also had this same thought. Since eve was made from Adams ribs, Adams ribs would contain Adams DNA, and since Adam is a male, he would have a XY chromosome. Eve is made from Adams ribs, I’m awfully confused.
 
Eve coming from Adam is a parallel to Jesus and the Church. God took it from the rib because that is where the lance pierced into the sacred heart from which flowed blood and water. That is the life of mankind.
 
Last edited:
Oh so, it’s figurative. That makes sense. Genesis is very complex and weird.
 
Even literally, why would God be able to make everything feminine out of Adam’s rib and yet not change Eve’s DNA?
 
I probably over thought it. God would of probably changed the DNA of the ribs. And now I feel weird.

😶😶😶😶😶😶😶
 
Eve coming from Adam is a parallel to Jesus and the Church. God took it from the rib because that is where the lance pierced into the sacred heart from which flowed blood and water. That is the life of mankind.
This.

The story is proof I couldn’t have been Adam; don’t try to take a rib from me! lol
 
It is figurative, plus if you want to follow your logic in biology a trans is not somebody that modified his/her DNA but somebody that modified his/her appearance through invasive surgery and hormonal treatments.
 
Oh so, it’s figurative. That makes sense. Genesis is very complex and weird.
There’s really all sorts of ways you could look at it. Either way: God is God.

I mean, in the previous paragraph we learned that he made Adam from dust. If he can make a man from dust than he can make a woman from a rib.
 
No she isn’t.

She was made from God taking Adam’s DNA and turning it into Eve’s DNA. To say Eve is what the world calls a “trans” would be to say God made “Adam & Steve” and than thought “wait a minute, those part don’t connect with each other like that. Let me tweek Steve a bit so it fits better”

“Add some silicone, make him a bit more emotional…there perfect transition. I’ll call you Eve”.

Which obviously never happened.
 
I had a random thought, some other people also had this same thought. Since eve was made from Adams ribs, Adams ribs would contain Adams DNA, and since Adam is a male, he would have a XY chromosome. Eve is made from Adams ribs, I’m awfully confused.
If it was not a cloning processs, then you can some alterations. Males have all the DNA needed to create a female, ie it is fairly simple to double the X and suppress the Y. It is more difficult to go the other way, and construct an XY male from an XX female. God can do it, I am sure.

Generally, you cannot expect to impose a modern framework on an ancient account. The author of Genesis wrote the story from what he knew, without considering modern genetics. It can get wrapped up in contradictions if you try to impose modern ideas instead of listening for the message of the original account.
 
I had a random thought, some other people also had this same thought. Since eve was made from Adams ribs, Adams ribs would contain Adams DNA, and since Adam is a male, he would have a XY chromosome. Eve is made from Adams ribs, I’m awfully confused.
God performed a miracle. How hard is that?

Certainly it is within God’s power to change DNA so that the chromosomes are male instead of female. Can’t the same be said of Our Lord becoming flesh from the flesh of Mary?
 
Is Eve a trans?
I’m sorry, what?! 😂
since Adam is a male, he would have a XY chromosome
On a more serious note, I see where you are going with this.

CCC 110 reminds us that
In order to discover the sacred authors’ intention, the reader must take into account the conditions of their time and culture, the literary genres in use at that time, and the modes of feeling, speaking and narrating then current. "For the fact is that truth is differently presented and expressed in the various types of historical writing, in prophetical and poetical texts, and in other forms of literary expression
CCC 115 further clarifies
According to an ancient tradition, one can distinguish between two senses of Scripture: the literal and the spiritual, the latter being subdivided into the allegorical, moral and anagogical senses.
It is unlikely that God literally pulled a rib out of Adam’s chest, or that he overlooked the genetic issue.
 
Last edited:
Scripture is not a science textbook. We need to understand the poetry of Genesis.
 
The first story of creation has God making man and woman both on the 6th day and says nothing about her coming from his rib. The second story has God making man on the day of creation and she comes his rib.

I will say, as a person who believes in evolution (for the most part) and that there was an Adam and Eve who were the first two humans, ie given a rational immortal soul, the story of Eve coming from Adam’s rib is a miracle that I can readily accept. Indeed, it sort of makes sense.
 
Jumping to some conclusions there, friend.

I do not think I have denied the resurrection or the miracles of Christ.
 
Is this really what CAF has become?
Was Eve a “trans” threads?
The notion itself is grievous, giving credence to such demented thoughts is bordering heretical.

Sheesh…
 
And just in case there are people here who think men have one less rib than women. No they do not. 😉
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top