B
BuphiloCatholic
Guest
theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/net-piracy-taking-toll-on-jobs-european-study-says/article1503357/
'A study into Internet piracy by a Paris-based consultancy published on Wednesday showed that 1.2 million jobs in the European Union could be lost over the next five years if more is not done to clamp down on illegal downloading.
…Those industries generated €860-billion ($1.194-trillion) and employed 14.4 million people in 2008. But in the same year, €10-billion and 186,000 jobs were lost to piracy, the study found.
If that trend continues – and the rapid increase in illegal downloads and advancing piracy techniques suggest it will – then up to 1.2 million jobs and €240-billion worth of European commerce could be wiped out by 2015.’
Now, could the few holdouts please explain again how piracy and file sharing isn’t a sin?
- Notice they call it “piracy”. That’s both question-begging, and a “loaded term”. Somali gunmen hijacking cargo ships off the African coast, holding them captive, and killing their crews are truly pirates. And people turning a profit on the black market selling bootleg DVDs and Music are also “pirates” in a sense. But people sharing files, for no profit, on the privacy of their home computers? How is that at all an act of “piracy”? To call it so is to cheapen the term and deliberately overstate the issue.
- notice it says “could be lost” not “will be lost”. Is it immoral to do something that “could” result in people losing jobs?
- Suppose I invent a pill that cures Cancer. Do you have any idea how many people, now devoting their careers to cancer research and treatment would be jobless the next day? I’d go with millions. Does that mean that would be immoral to cure Cancer?