B
Brendan_64
Guest
It is not out of context, here’s the entire paragraph.LOL
Nice way to take a sentence out of context.
"25. Every Catholic Christian understands that the fast and abstinence regulations admit of change, unlike the commandments and precepts of that unchanging divine moral law which the Church must today and always defend as immutable. This said, we emphasize that our people are henceforth free from the obligation traditionally binding under pain of sin in what pertains to Friday abstinence,except as noted above for Lent. We stress this so that “no"scrupulosity will enter into examinations of conscience,confessions, or personal decisions on this point.”
The first sentence of the paragraph also clearly states that it is not a case of divine law.
The bishops of the USA clearly state that except in the case of Lent, “people are henceforth free from the obligation traditionally binding under pain of sin in what pertains to Friday abstinence”.Again, should you forget to do penance on Friday, it is not a sin. Should you choose to not do penance on Friday, it is a sin.
It is actually you who is trying to read something (that doesn’t exist) into these statements. If you wish to be scrupulous on such matters then that is your own choice, but it is not right to go about telling others that it is a sin not to do Friday penance, when the Bishops Conferences, of both the USA and England & Wales tell us that it is not a sin.