Is God a hypocrite?

  • Thread starter Thread starter galoriam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

galoriam

Guest
A student of mine asked me why God (in the Old Testament) killed people. The example he used was when the Egyptians were killed to save the Israelites. He said, “That makes God a hypocrite because He’s supposed to love everyone.” How should I respond to that?
 
A student of mine asked me why God (in the Old Testament) killed people. The example he used was when the Egyptians were killed to save the Israelites. He said, “That makes God a hypocrite because He’s supposed to love everyone.” How should I respond to that?
How to respond depends, of course, on the age of your student. This earlier discussion thread should be of help to you in forming a response:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=130837
 
A student of mine asked me why God (in the Old Testament) killed people. The example he used was when the Egyptians were killed to save the Israelites. He said, “That makes God a hypocrite because He’s supposed to love everyone.” How should I respond to that?
He’s God, and not only is God not bound by human law, He wrote human law!

Other than that, if the question is sincerely asked, then do your best to explain, and say your not sure and will get back to him. If your student is trying to bait you, then don’t play along.
 
A student of mine asked me why God (in the Old Testament) killed people. The example he used was when the Egyptians were killed to save the Israelites. He said, “That makes God a hypocrite because He’s supposed to love everyone.” How should I respond to that?
I’m not even sure if Scripture says God loves everyone, but I hardly think it would be loving to allow the Egyptians to get away with injustice and idolatry. Keep in mind the fact that society at the time of the Israelites was centered around a different kind of love than we think of today - that is, true, agape love. This kind of love is taking of action that best benefits the community as a whole, or the “common good”, as opposed to the individual-centered society we have. (This is the kind of love that drives a “mama bear” to do whatever it takes to protect her cubs.) This is because the Israelites were in far greater danger of being destroyed by an evil attitude; they did not have the Catholic Church, against which the gates of hell will not prevail. If exceedingly strict punishments were necessary to preserve a God-fearing society, so be it. Nowadays, we are in no such dangers. This is why we are so shocked by the stories of the great flood and the Passover.

Consider, also, the great power and influence Pharaoh had in Egyptian society. Most Egyptians were probably indoctrinated into believing his word was law and that he was a god. As such, they most likely would agree to not let the Israelites go; it’s not as if Pharaoh was evil and every other Egyptian was completely innocent. Keep in mind, as well, God’s promise to Abraham (I think?) that He would not destroy Sodom if He found just a few innocent people. It is probably implied that, when God did send the angel of death, few, if any, of the Egyptians were innocent.

Of course, this is all just my explanation. A priest or apologist on this site could probably help you out.
 
I neglected to mention that I teach Theology to 10th graders in a Catholic High School, though not all the students are Catholic. So the question came from a 10th grader. Our topic is “Jesus in the New Testament”, but we talk about the Old Testament, of course, especially in relation to the Gospel of Matthew. Thank you for your responses!
 
The Pharoah of Egypt was responsible for the health and welfare of his people. Prior to each plague, God had Moses and Aaron confront the Pharoah asking for the release of the Isrealites.

The Pharoah disobedience was successively met with increasing consequences to the empire and to all the citizens under his command.
 
A possible response:

Life and death are God’s domain. It is not wrong for God to move people from one to the other, either in the case of killing or in the case of bringing back from the dead.

Loving a person does not necessitate (and probably doesn’t allow) sheltering that person from justice. An example: Hell is not empty, and while God loves the people who set themselves so against God that they end up there, He does not remove this consequence of their behavior.

And finally, God is not required to do what he tells us to do. In the same way that it is not hypocritical for a parent to make and enforce bed times for his children (according to their needs) that he does not follow because his needs are not the same as his children’s, it is not hypocritical for God to forbid us from performing actions based on judgments we are unable to make while preforming them Himself based on judgments He most definitely can make.
 
God and humans are not to be held to the same standards. God has at times commanded people to do things that humans on their own would not be allowed to do, for instance Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice Isaac. This simply means that God has chosen to reveal Himself in different ways to individuals in specific circumstances than he does to humanity in general.

As Augustine says in Book 1 Ch 21 in City of God, *“When Abraham was ready to kill his son, so far from being blamed for cruelty he was praised for his devotion; it was not an act of crime but of obedience.” * Since God is the Lawgiver, it is impossible for His actions to be unjust since His actions and justice are inseparable.
 
God and humans are not to be held to the same standards. God has at times commanded people to do things that humans on their own would not be allowed to do, for instance Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice Isaac. This simply means that God has chosen to reveal Himself in different ways to individuals in specific circumstances than he does to humanity in general.

As Augustine says in Book 1 Ch 21 in City of God, *“When Abraham was ready to kill his son, so far from being blamed for cruelty he was praised for his devotion; it was not an act of crime but of obedience.” * Since God is the Lawgiver, it is impossible for His actions to be unjust since His actions and justice are inseparable.
I hate to be the devil’s advocate here, but I think this answer is precisely the problem; isn’t it hypocritical for God to break His own rules simply because He is God? Perhaps a more satisfactory answer would be that God isn’t as unjust as we think. Remember there are two Great Commandments, and the greater is to love God. It makes sense that the love of God should surpass the love of neighbor, as in Abraham’s case.
 
A student of mine asked me why God (in the Old Testament) killed people. The example he used was when the Egyptians were killed to save the Israelites. He said, “That makes God a hypocrite because He’s supposed to love everyone.” How should I respond to that?
I think the answer to this depends on your view on the inerrancy of scripture. If you view scripture as inspired, rather than literally God’s word, the killings in the OT are seen as more the product of men writing in their culture and time.
 
I think the answer to this depends on your view on the inerrancy of scripture. If you view scripture as inspired, rather than literally God’s word, the killings in the OT are seen as more the product of men writing in their culture and time.
The Catholic Church does recognize Sacred Scripture as being the inerrant Word of God. This does not necessarily mean everything in it is to be taken literally, but the account of the Exodus certainly seems to be literal, otherwise the Jews would have no reason to celebrate Passover.
 
Find a alternate way to explain the deaths. In the TV show Exoduse Decoded, while it has various flaws as most recognize, none were able to refute the idea of gases escaping from the earth due to earthquakes and killing the egyptian children becaue they were sleeping on the floor becasue the gas travels low. They can’t refute it becasue it has happened more than once, the last time in 1986.

suite101.com/content/1986-limnic-eruption-of-lake-nyos-a111515

I think you would be better off helping them to realize that gods creations interact with each other in such a way as to support life not save it. And if life is to endure the process of give and take is vital. Cause and effect, action and reaction. We are created to be sefl sufficent, not pampered.
 
Well honestly think about it. No God is not a hypocrite. He does not change nor will He. The comparing of the OT and NT and saying that God is different as to somehow equate that there are two “versions” of God is a heresy…the Marcionism heresy. God is a lover who is a warrior. Jesus is the second person of the Holy Trinity.
 
I hate to be the devil’s advocate here, but I think this answer is precisely the problem; isn’t it hypocritical for God to break His own rules simply because He is God? Perhaps a more satisfactory answer would be that God isn’t as unjust as we think. Remember there are two Great Commandments, and the greater is to love God. It makes sense that the love of God should surpass the love of neighbor, as in Abraham’s case.
But when did God ever establish the rules He gives to Mankind as the rules He gives to Himself?

That’s the problem with this
 
But when did God ever establish the rules He gives to Mankind as the rules He gives to Himself?

That’s the problem with this
You’re not serious, are you? If God can’t follow rules that He expects humans to follow, how is He any better than us? Obviously, either there is some justification for God’s actions that we simply haven’t found, or God is a hypocrite. No God would say to his creations, “Okay, people, here’s how it’s gonna work. You follow these rules to keep yourselves civil and holy, while I abitrarily break them whenever I feel like it.”
 
You’re not serious, are you? If God can’t follow rules that He expects humans to follow, how is He any better than us?
because He’s God.
No God would say to his creations, “Okay, people, here’s how it’s gonna work. You follow these rules to keep yourselves civil and holy, while I abitrarily break them whenever I feel like it.”
Why can’t He?

nb: I’m not saying God does do this, but if He were to, how could you impugn the Originator of Justice for being unjust? It’s simply impossible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top