M
MichaelLewis
Guest
Yes we did John, and I still don’t understand what you tried to communicate. As I recall, you couldn’t (and didn’t think it necessary to) give an account of how anyone would experience anything differently if someone made a free choice vs. a random choice. You asserted that there was a difference, but you couldn’t give an account of how we could ever know the difference. It is as if you asserted that there is a difference between a feline and a cat; you say they are indistinguishable except that if you have a feline you are morally good in virtue of the feline and if you have a cat you are morally evil in virtue of the cat. I have no idea what you are trying to differentiate, I only know that you are going treat people differently if they have something you call a “cat” instead of what you call a “feline”.we’ve gone a few rounds on this point in the past, and it’s not that we don’t have an articulated position, it’s that you don’t agree with it.
Our debate is here: http://forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=44720&page=2
If anyone wants to look.