Is Greece part of the West or East?

  • Thread starter Thread starter I_thirst_4_YOU
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I

I_thirst_4_YOU

Guest
I got into a conversation with a Eastern Rite friend and he was talking about East and West.

He said that Greece is part of the Western tradition and in the West over all. I didn’t think so–who is right?
 
I got into a conversation with a Eastern Rite friend and he was talking about East and West.

He said that Greece is part of the Western tradition and in the West over all. I didn’t think so–who is right?
No, he is wrong. The Greek tradition is considered eastern. It might be part of the western world in other senses but when it comes to tradition in Christianity it is considered eastern. East vs. west was basically a division of language. The west spoke Latin and the east spoke Greek and Syriac and a few other languages.
 
Definately West!Greece is called the cradle of western civilization;)
 
Definately West!Greece is called the cradle of western civilization;)
But they are talking about Eastern Christianity and Western Christianity, in that sense the Greeks are very much Eastern.
 
But they are talking about Eastern Christianity and Western Christianity, in that sense the Greeks are very much Eastern.
In fact I am talk both.

Mostly Christian tradition and culture.

He says Greece is West for both. What is the correct answer for both tradition and culture?
 
In terms of Christianity (both tradition and culture) Greece is part of the Eastern tradition. In terms of just about everything else Greece is considered part of the Western tradition.

Deacon Ed
 
And yet the Assyrian Church of the East has always called Byzantines “Westeners.”

Just depends on your perspective, I guess.
 
No, he is wrong. The Greek tradition is considered eastern. It might be part of the western world in other senses but when it comes to tradition in Christianity it is considered eastern. East vs. west was basically a division of language. The west spoke Latin and the east spoke Greek and Syriac and a few other languages.
Sorry Jimmy, his friend may not be right, but I don’t think he is wrong. Perspective plays a big part. Funny that when you say “The west spoke Latin and the east spoke Greek and Syriac and a few other languages.” you rather sound more like a Westernener in lumping everyone East of Rome as an “Easterner”… “Greek and Syriac” or “Greek or Syriac”? We aren’t a monolithic easy to define “non-Latin” catch all.

When looking at it through the lense of the Imperium, it would be easy enough to make this “East West” divide. But the question comes up here: What are the definitions of East & West being used by the folks who are having a discussion?

Short answer: We need more info, or to offer a more comprehensive and nuanced answer as the term(s) “East & West” are not set in stone and have multiple connotations. A Maronite, for example, once referred to me as being “Roman” from the standpoint that to him, Byzantines ARE Westerners.
 
I got into a conversation with a Eastern Rite friend and he was talking about East and West.

He said that Greece is part of the Western tradition and in the West over all. I didn’t think so–who is right?
The Greek Byzantine Church (both the Catholic and the Orthodox) is considered to be an “Eastern Church” for purposes of Canon Law and Theology.

The Greeks themselves seem to identify themselves as neither east nor west, but on the border, and their modern culture is fairly westernized.
 
40.png
ASimpleSinner:
Short answer: We need more info, or to offer a more comprehensive and nuanced answer as the term(s) “East & West” are not set in stone and have multiple connotations. A Maronite, for example, once referred to me as being “Roman” from the standpoint that to him, Byzantines ARE Westerners.
It’s quite possible that the Maronite in question may have been translating the term roum catholique (or roum orthodoxe). While the word “roum” does mean “Rome,” it is only used in reference to “New Rome,” i.e., Constantinople.

More common among Maronites is to say that Byzantines (of whatever particular Church) use an “Eastern rite.” The meaning is not that Maronites are not “eastern” but that they (along with the Syriac Church and the Chaldeans, etc) use a non-Constantinopolitan rite. Granted, that particular expression is not common in the US (even among immigrants) but it is still to be heard in the Patriarchal territories.
 
As someone in the Church of the East, I gotta say that we always referred to the “Byzantines” and the “Romans” as the Westerners. 🙂 Everything West of the Euphrates is Western from our viewpoint. And East of it is Church of the East. 😉

But seriously, from a historical point of view, there were two churches {ours and the Armenians’} that were formed outside of the borders of the Roman Empire. To us outsiders, there is an East and West, defined by the Imperial borders. To the insiders, there is an East and West, also confined by the Imperial borders, but defined by a line about close to the middle of the geographic Empire.
 
Sorry Jimmy, his friend may not be right, but I don’t think he is wrong. Perspective plays a big part. Funny that when you say “The west spoke Latin and the east spoke Greek and Syriac and a few other languages.” you rather sound more like a Westernener in lumping everyone East of Rome as an “Easterner”… “Greek and Syriac” or “Greek or Syriac”? We aren’t a monolithic easy to define “non-Latin” catch all.

When looking at it through the lense of the Imperium, it would be easy enough to make this “East West” divide. But the question comes up here: What are the definitions of East & West being used by the folks who are having a discussion?

Short answer: We need more info, or to offer a more comprehensive and nuanced answer as the term(s) “East & West” are not set in stone and have multiple connotations. A Maronite, for example, once referred to me as being “Roman” from the standpoint that to him, Byzantines ARE Westerners.
Yeh, it depends on perspective. According to the Church of the East everyone else would be western but if you look at the way it is generally understood the Greeks would be eastern. Take for example the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches. It is the canons for all the Catholic Churches except for the Latin Church. You can think of it in degrees but in general the Greeks are eastern.

Regarding the language of Latin vs. the other languages, in the early Church there were differences of understanding that ran along the language boundary. That is a large reason for the Great Schism.
 
Historically, Greece was a potent mixing bowl of all manner of traditions, tribes, and schools of thought, and also a radiator of those syntheses (see: Gandharan India). Any definition of ‘East v. West’ is pretty irrelevant overall. Okay, they didn’t know a whole bunch of Chinese people, but they knew loads of Africans (both North African and all the way down to Lake Nyasa, probably), Western Euros, nomadic Central Asians, and so on.

They were a busy, turbulent, and well-traveled lot, and pretty used to meeting rather odd peoples from all over.
 
but if you look at the way it is generally understood the Greeks would be eastern.
I don’t mean to nit-pick or be trifling on this one, but the weasel words of “it is generally understood” don’t help us a lot. Generally understood in some contexts not others… If they were discussing if Greece is part of “western culture” that is another answer altogether than a discussion about “E & W” from the standpoint of patristics or classification of churches.

I think we are mostly agree, just saying the same thing differently.
 
But seriously, from a historical point of view, there were two churches {ours and the Armenians’} that were formed outside of the borders of the Roman Empire.

Don’t forget the Ethiopians! I believe they were outside the Empire, too.
 
Your Grace,

I stand corrected. I’m sorry that I don’t know much about the Ethiopian Church. I thought that it was tied into the Alexandrian {Coptic} Church at the beginning… I guess not? If so, it would make sense. 🙂 I will have to read up on the Ethiopian Church and it’s origins. I love history O:)

In Him,
Anthony
 
40.png
antgaria:
I’m sorry that I don’t know much about the Ethiopian Church. I thought that it was tied into the Alexandrian {Coptic} Church at the beginning… I guess not? If so, it would make sense. 🙂 I will have to read up on the Ethiopian Church and it’s origins. I love history O:)
The Ethiopian Church is Alexandrene by origin and you were right: it was tied to the Copts. And as bpbasilphx has already pointed out, Ethiopia was outside the Roman Empire.
 
In fact I am talk both.

Mostly Christian tradition and culture.

He says Greece is West for both. What is the correct answer for both tradition and culture?
In my opinion, this is a very salient point in understanding the sad division of our church. It can also be a very ‘touchy’ point! I will be happy to elaborate upon my views if there is any response/interest–(pro or con). Greece is referred to as the ‘cradle of western civilization’ due to it’s introduction of forms of democracy, it’s philosophers, mathematicians, commerce, forms of literature, etc.! However, all of these contributions to our ‘western heritage’,for which we will always be most grateful and live with us today, pretty much had been completed by the time of Christ. Generally speaking, within the past 2000 years, Greece & the Greeks—though located within the fringe of modern Europe & a member of the European Union—have become increasingly EASTERN in no uncertain terms. The to/fro invasions—the 400+yr Ottomon Empire influence, the co-joining of Greeks with the Armenians, Assyrians, Syrians, etc. within the Byzantine Empire and the ‘melding’ of an Eastern identity/culture/eastern thought process among them verses the ‘WEST’ and ‘western thought’ is well documented historical fact. Greek food is really a slight variation of Turkish food. Their type of recreational music and dance is most certainly difficult to distinguish from that of middle-eastern peoples. Greece did not take part at all in the Rennaissance, which further defined ‘western civilization’. Greece–as we have known it for a long time–and most certainly today is part of the East.
 
mesopotamia is considered the cradle of western civilization too. so to say that because greece is also considererd a cradle of western civilization doesn’t make them western. for one, their language and culture is more akin to the eastern mediterranian peoples. genetically, they are closer to turks then say the spanish or central italians. during the roman empire they were part of the east. the greek language is closer to armenian than western languages.http://dienekes.50webs.com/arp/articles/ieorigins/nature.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top