C
coyote
Guest
Flop, interesting argument. Would you feel comfortable seeing your spouse, your daughter or your parents engage in this dance?Uh? What is going on here? I don’t mean to offend anyone, but I feel like I’ve either walked into a Puritan convention here, or else ‘Scrupulosity Anonymous’.
Main point I would like to make here is that the OP is asking whether it is a sin or not. Not whether it is a holy thing to do or not. There’s a lot of stuff that is neither holy nor sinful.
True, there’s a good chance that no saint has ever done it. That doesn’t automatically make it sinful.
So the OP says he’d rather not explain it. Maybe because it’s embarrasing or because, regardless of whether it is actually sinful or not, the description may offend some forum users. That doesn’t necessarily make it sinful.
If Jesus or Mary was in the room? This has been explained not to be a valid argument against an action many times on this forum (maybe it should be in a sticky). For example, would you chat to a friend while you are before Jesus at Adoration? No. Does that mean chatting is a sin? No. Similarly with grinding, just because you wouldn’t do it in front of Jesus actually present, doesn’t make it a sin.
Post #9, I think it is, CCC quote. Seems to say grinding is not modesty. But, doesn’t say there that things which aren’t modesty are actually sin. (If there is a bit in the CCC that does say that, can you please post it).
As others have said, even if it is a sin, how could it possibly be mortal if we don’t actually have full knowledge that it is wrong?
However, another question is whether it is even grave matter. Why would you say that it is? A style of dance may mimic a sexual act but from what I’ve seen of grinding it is not a sexual act. That’s the only thing that I think could make it grave - either that, or, as I said in my earlier post, if it is a scandal. Otherwise mimicing and possible temptations doesn’t make something grave (or even necessarily sinful).
I have suffered scrupulosity in the past so that’s one reason why I like to take this tack of trying to explain that things aren’t necessarily sinful… but even without that, I still reckon that we shouldn’t say something is a sin unless we have a clear reason to say that it is (rather than saying, it just doesn’t seem right). By all means, call it not the best action, not recommended, call it a possible temptation to sin, call it maybe a sin, but I don’t think you should speak as if you are sure it is a sin when you are not.
In my youth “grinding” meant something a lot more like simulated intercourse with clothes on. This dance style sounds like a more public variation of that.
Does it rise to the level of mutual frottage?
