Is Hinduism the eldest of Islam and Christianity and budism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter excaliber
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hinduism is very old, and has evolved over time. It has its roots in the Indus Valley culture (Harappa). For example, the idea of maya, that life is illusion, dates all the way back.
“Maya” has more meanings than just “illusion”. “Maya” as used in the Vedas, in fact, doesn’t mean “illusion”. Only Advaita Vedantists believe in maya as “illusion”. Most Hindus aren’t Advaitans.
Hinduism of course has fruits, the most obvious of which is the caste system – the entrenched class system in which the overwhelming majority of people cannot escape poverty, do not try to escape poverty, nor should anyone bother to try to help them, because it is their KARMA.
You’re thinking of the jati system, not the caste, or varnashramadharma, system.
 
You’re thinking of the jati system, not the caste, or varnashramadharma, system.
I am thinking of the system which EVEN AFTER GHANDI was still prejudiced enough to keep Untouchables in their place. It is taking the assimilation of American (dare I say Christian?) culture and values to gradually unlock Indian economics.

Oh, I know. Can you feel the love?

Nope.

Let’s face it. The coutries that have the most
  • personal liberty
  • economic class/social status fluidity
  • education
  • creative arts
  • inventiveness
  • human rights
  • not only basic needs met but economic growth
  • technology, scientific advancement, and medicine
are Israel and the nations that are traditionally known as Christian.
 
I am thinking of the system which EVEN AFTER GHANDI was still prejudiced enough to keep Untouchables in their place. It is taking the assimilation of American (dare I say Christian?) culture and values to gradually unlock Indian economics.

Oh, I know. Can you feel the love?

Nope.

Let’s face it. The coutries that have the most
  • personal liberty
  • economic class/social status fluidity
  • education
  • creative arts
  • inventiveness
  • human rights
  • not only basic needs met but economic growth
  • technology, scientific advancement, and medicine
are Israel and the nations that are traditionally known as Christian.
Yes, you’re thinking of the jati system, not the varnashramadharma system as originally formulated. Hindus will agree that the jati system, and the misuse of the varnashramadharma system, have hampered India’s full development over the past several centuries.

If you wish to learn about the critiques of the jati system, and critiques of the misuses of the varnashramadharma system, from Indians (Hindus, Buddhist, Jain, Sikh, etc.) themselves, I suggest starting with the [Bhagavad Gita (http://www.atmajyoti.org/hi_gita_commentary_35.asp), then look into Buddhism, the Sikhs, and of course the Bhaktas. Also check out modern Hindu leaders, like Mata Amritanandamayima, otherwise known as Ammachi, who, when asked about karma and suffering, said: “If it is someone’s karma to suffer, consider it your karma to help him.”

Naturally, Christianity and Islam have helped Hindus re-discover their own native Hindu critiques of the jati and misapplied varnashramadharma systems, just as Hindus and Buddhists and Zoroastrians have influenced the Abrahamic faiths. Each religion represents a facet of the total truth, and all of us can teach each other something that we’ve overlooked, misapplied, or almost forgotten.
 
I never realy considerd hinduism.
Only Christian denominations and Islam.

It seems Hinduism is older then I thought, and I see no reason to remain ignorant of it.

Dose hindu religion have any fruits to show for itself, such as resurections…miracle healings…etc…etc?
They have a great caste system I hear.😦
 
I am thinking of the system which EVEN AFTER GHANDI was still prejudiced enough to keep Untouchables in their place. It is taking the assimilation of American (dare I say Christian?) culture and values to gradually unlock Indian economics.

Oh, I know. Can you feel the love?

Nope.

Let’s face it. The coutries that have the most
  • personal liberty
  • economic class/social status fluidity
  • education
  • creative arts
  • inventiveness
  • human rights
  • not only basic needs met but economic growth
  • technology, scientific advancement, and medicine
are Israel and the nations that are traditionally known as Christian.
Um, Israel is a racist nation with the above list only for the jewish caste.
(They don’t rank at the top of the world’s list for those either).

Regarding cultural caste systems, if you think western culture has none, you’re seriously deluded.
 
“If it is someone’s karma to suffer, consider it your karma to help him.”.
See now you make more sense to me. This reminds me of a date I once had at applebees. The busboy dropped a load on the floor, and I moved to help him pick it up – I figured, the sooner it was picked up, the safer for everyone. My date literally grabbed my arm and said, “Don’t interfere with his Karma.” It made me so angry! I said, “I would hate to be you in YOUR next life.”
 
I’m guessing that the OP asked the question in terms of the usual linear interpretation of history. But here may be a point of interest. History can be viewed as a line of deterministic events resulting in change, but based on eternal unchanging laws. So we might say that we have the inner Nature of existence and the outer manifestation of our engagement of its laws by means of thought and choice. We might call our perception and inner ordering of those invisible laws our esoteric experience.

Why might this delineation be important to this thread? It is because the three named religions, as well as many others, had (have) both an exoteric and an esoteric form. That is to say they have a public face which is very different according to culture, time, and location. They also have an inner aspect which is remarkably homogeneous despite any outward factor. Few, indeed very few, in any of the exoteric practices progress into or achieve in the esoteric core of these religions. That core has actually to do with the fundamental nature of Man and God in a different way than the surface aspect of the religion, or the public face of the religion.

I’d venture to say then, that the thread question can be seen in a different light. While there may be great superficial differences in the faces of the world religions, some being older that others, the esoteric, being their source, preceeds them and is therefore older.
 
Yes. I do believe fundamentally, the Truth is but ONE.
Bhagwad Geeta 7.22]
yo yo yaam yaam tanum bhaktah sraddhayacitum icchati
tasya tasyachalam sraddham tam eva viddhymany aham!

Whoever, desires to faithfully worship a particular form(Way), whichever one it is, I grant him the neccassary conviction to do so.

So I think Christ offered One such Way to a group of people. Follow it faithfully, and you shall know the Truth too. As will a faithful Muslim or a Hindu. IHO, the potential is hidden in the the word “Faith” itself, the Object of ones Faith is just a Tool(and incidental one at that).
I got a copy of the Gita but thats not what i read in that verse you refrenced. Instead it reads;

7:22

Sa taya sraddhaya yuktas
Tasyaradhanam ihate
labhate ca tatah kaman
mayaiva vihitan hi tan

Endowed with such a faith he seeks, favors of a particluar demigod and obtains his desires. But in actuality these benefits are bestowed by Me alone.
None that I’m aware of.

But according to tradition, Saint Thomas went to India and proved God is God and the Hindu gods are false when he threw water into the air and it turned into flowers. But this is only a tradition.

Tradition aside, there are innumerable miracles within Christianity - the most recent of which I am aware is a pro-abortionist who turned pro-life after he had a vision of Saint Thomas Aquinas. You can read about him here (English translation here)
Have you ever heard of the “hugging saint” Ama who supposedly licked a man’s entire body who had leprosy and healed him.
Not me personally, but my ancestors were Hindus. My family tradition claims they were Nambudiri Brahmins. I am native of a village in a Taluk of Thrissur district in the state of Kerala, India, with the accepted tradition of Apostle Thomas having converted Nambudiris. For nineteen and a half centuries until my father moved out as the first one (I was seven years old at the time; I stayed behind to finish the year of schooling and joined the nuclear family when I was eight), that is where my family had always lived, within ten kilometers of where Apostle Thomas landed. Tradition has it that those Hindu Nambudiris who did not convert as a result of the miracle Apostle Thomas performed which led to the conversion of some Nambudiri Brahmins, fled the place cursing it. The Taluk was named “Cursed Forest” or Shabakkad (Malayalam: Shabbam = Curse, Kaad = forest - Shabbakkad) for that reason. The name evolved to Chavakkad. The unbroken living tradition is well known and accepted by all, including Hindus.

I wonder why I keep getting mistaken for a male. I don’t use any special male font while posting here. All the people who have known me personally can confirm I am female. 🙂
Kerela huh? I just got back from studying abroad over there. I stayed at Loyal College, ironically.
 
Yes. I do believe fundamentally, the Truth is but ONE.
Bhagwad Geeta 7.22]
yo yo yaam yaam tanum bhaktah sraddhayacitum icchati
tasya tasyachalam sraddham tam eva viddhymany aham!

Whoever, desires to faithfully worship a particular form(Way), whichever one it is, I grant him the neccassary conviction to do so.

So I think Christ offered One such Way to a group of people. Follow it faithfully, and you shall know the Truth too. As will a faithful Muslim or a Hindu. IHO, the potential is hidden in the the word “Faith” itself, the Object of ones Faith is just a Tool(and incidental one at that).
I got a copy of the Gita but thats not what i read in that verse you refrenced. Instead it reads;

7:22

Sa taya sraddhaya yuktas
Tasyaradhanam ihate
labhate ca tatah kaman
mayaiva vihitan hi tan


Endowed with such a faith he seeks, favors of a particluar demigod and obtains his desires. But in actuality these benefits are bestowed by Me alone.

This verse I got from the website Sacred Text:

Whosoever desires to worship whatever deity — using any name, form, and method — with faith, I make their faith steady in that very deity. Endowed with steady faith they worship that deity, and obtain their wishes through that deity. Those wishes are, indeed, granted only by Me. (7.21-22)

sa tayā śraddhayā yuktas tasyārādhanam īhate
labhate ca tataḥ kāmān mayaivaḥ vihitān hi tān 7.22

None that I’m aware of.

But according to tradition, Saint Thomas went to India and proved God is God and the Hindu gods are false when he threw water into the air and it turned into flowers. But this is only a tradition.

Tradition aside, there are innumerable miracles within Christianity - the most recent of which I am aware is a pro-abortionist who turned pro-life after he had a vision of Saint Thomas Aquinas. You can read about him here (English translation here)
Have you ever heard of the “hugging saint” Ama who supposedly licked a man’s entire body who had leprosy and healed him.
Not me personally, but my ancestors were Hindus. My family tradition claims they were Nambudiri Brahmins. I am native of a village in a Taluk of Thrissur district in the state of Kerala, India, with the accepted tradition of Apostle Thomas having converted Nambudiris. For nineteen and a half centuries until my father moved out as the first one (I was seven years old at the time; I stayed behind to finish the year of schooling and joined the nuclear family when I was eight), that is where my family had always lived, within ten kilometers of where Apostle Thomas landed. Tradition has it that those Hindu Nambudiris who did not convert as a result of the miracle Apostle Thomas performed which led to the conversion of some Nambudiri Brahmins, fled the place cursing it. The Taluk was named “Cursed Forest” or Shabakkad (Malayalam: Shabbam = Curse, Kaad = forest - Shabbakkad) for that reason. The name evolved to Chavakkad. The unbroken living tradition is well known and accepted by all, including Hindus.

I wonder why I keep getting mistaken for a male. I don’t use any special male font while posting here. All the people who have known me personally can confirm I am female. 🙂
Kerela huh? I just got back from studying abroad over there. I stayed at Loyal College, ironically. Its considered God’s own country you know. I wish i would have a chance to independently explore the different religions but we were on a tight schedule.
 
That does not answer the question whether Hinduism is older than Judaism because the exact time when Rig Veda (the oldest Scripture of Hinduism) first came into existence is not exactly known. All sorts of numbers have been suggested, starting with “thousands of years ago” (since thousands merely means more than one thousand, it really doesn’t mean a lot) but none of them can be verified with any certainty. Rig Veda is definitely very old because other Hindu Scriptures like the Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita which are also ancient came much later than Rig Veda, including the other three Vedas which came after it.
THis should help

Srry for the double post above, its not giving me the option to edit them.
 
Whosoever desires to worship whatever deity — using any name, form, and method — with faith, I make their faith steady in that very deity. Endowed with steady faith they worship that deity, and obtain their wishes through that deity. Those wishes are, indeed, granted only by Me. (7.21-22)

sa tayā śraddhayā yuktas tasyārādhanam īhate
labhate ca tataḥ kāmān mayaivaḥ vihitān hi tān 7.22
Krishna is saying that even those who worship other deities, and get their wishes fulfilled, are actually worshipping Krishna. What Krishna is saying is actually very similar to the mainstream Catholic and Orthodox view of salvation: that people of other religions may be saved (even without consciously becoming members of a Christian church in this life), but if they are saved, then their salvation is only due to Christ.
 
B]How ancient are the Vedas?
according to Hindu beliefs, the vedas are beyond human valour. They are eternal. The Vedas were there before creation
How can that happen? After all, there was a man who wrote the Vedas. The invention of paper is not more than 400 years old. Therefore, the vedas cannot be more than 400-500 years old.
The Vedas are available on Bhoj-patras and Tad-Patras, before the invention of paper
Therefore, your thinking is not correct.

**The tradition of writing literature on Bhoj-patras and Tad-Patras is of 1000-15000 years old BC. Therefore, the Vedas would also be a fifteen hundred years old creation. Many ancient scholars acknowledge this fact. **

The scholars, who have collected mantras on Bhojpatra and Tad-Patra, have mentioned their names and dates of their writing. which are more than three to four thousand years B.C. But the Vedas existed even before that. This has also been wriiten by themselves.

Maharashi Parashar, who lived thousands of years ago wrote in verse 21 chapter one of Parashar Smriti;

Na Kashchid Vedakata cha, Vedam smritya chaturmukhah Tataiva dharman smarati manu kalpantare antare

No man is the writer of the Vedas. Four faced Brahma too, is not the writer of the Vedas because Brahmaji himself remmbers the Vedas before he brings them out. In the same way, at the end of every Kalpa Manu remebers dharmas as Brahma.

Indian Scripture says;

(Rishayon Mantra drishtarah na tu kartarah)

All the rishis who lived in INdia, the rishis who discovered different mantras, the rishis whose names are associated with Veda-mantras–all thos ancient rishes are not the rachayitas (creators) of the Vedamantra. On the contrary, they are called mantradrishta rishis (rishis are basically seers, those who see into the future, inton the unknown) because the Veda-mantras existed prior to them.
The Vedas survivied because of the tradition Shruti (hearing). Therefore, the Vedas are called Shruti also.

Since when did the Vedas exist? It is very difficult to answer that question. But certainly they came into existence when there was neither Jesus Christ nor Moses. Neither Englishmen were there, nor any rich and developed culture existed in India. Therefore, none, Muslim, English, Christian or any external historian or scientist is capable or competent to provide any authentic evidence regarding scriptures written by our rishis; and nor will the dharmaparayan Hindu public will listen to any unreasonable logic or argument.

Famous German Scholar, Max Mueller has accepted 6000 BC. as the time of the origin of the Vedas. Keith, Baber and many other scholars have proved the Vedas to be 6 to 8 thousand years B.C. old, using historical and geographical evidences along with their other scientific factors, rejecting the fact of their being apaurushey. Is the fact based logic of the foreign scholars wrong? If so what are the bases of your calling it wrong?

The foreign process is tring to find historocity in the Vedas and trying to prove their ancientness this basis. They have a prejudice of declaring their own civilsation-culture as ancient at the back of their mind and heart. Even so, all Indian and Foreign historians, geographists, and the so-called scientists accept this fact undisputedly with one voice that the RigVeda is the most ancient book of the world. In a rough and ready manner this is the biggest victory for the devotees of Indian culture.

The Indian process forges ahad confirming the apaurusheyata of the Vedas, and their basees are astrological calculations, geographical and historical background. The foreigners have nothing to refute it. According to Indian calculation some portions of the Brahmin-granthas are 2200 years old BC.

Asserting the difference of prakaran (refrence), episode or subject matter, Lokmanya Tilak, Pandit Umesh Chandra Vidyaratna, Narayan Bhavan Ram Pavni and Avinash Chandra Das have proved thaat the ascertainment of time (period) (arrived at) regarding the Vedas by the westerners is wrong. The Vedas belong to the period prior to ice age and are lakhs of years old.

The kind of labour that Lokmanya Tilak has put in determining the period of the Vedas has not been done by anyone else. The following mantra is the most strong evidence, among all the evidences from the Rigveda, given by Tilak, in the context of spring celebration in Mrigashrsha Naksatra.

*Sushupvans ribhavastadaprihchhatagohya ka idamno abubudhata

Shvanam vasto bodhayitaramnabraveet samvatsar idamadyavyakhayat)*

Rig Veda 1-16-13

The meaning of this mantra is: O seasons! When you asked who had woken us up at that time then the vasta sun said that the awakener was shvan (dog) because that was the end of samvatsar (year). On this Mr. Tilak says that Ritu is Ritu. These Ritus sleep for twelve days at the house of Agohya sun i.e. help the solar year and the lunar year meet together, then the shvan wakes them up. It is the same shvan that the spring season has sampat in Mrigashirsha. On calculation, we find that to go round one Sampat completely, it takes 2600 years. The above situation brings us to 2200 years BC. This position of spring sampat cannnot be wrong at anytime past, present or future. But this postion can re-establish iteself after a gap of 2600 years. It is difficult to say as to which year’s spring sampat has been described in the above mantra. So this paribhramam (cyclical movement) confirms that the Vedas were there lakhs of years B.C.
The period of the Vedas is as old as the period of man’s origin. There is a tradition of speaking out the daily sankalp before starting any good or otherwise work in the Hindu darma-shastras. The secret of calculating the period of man’s origin is hidden in the sankalp. The essence of sankalp is like this

(Dwitiya paradhe vaivvasuat yanwantrae ashtvinsati kalau yuge kali pratham charan 51505 gatabde…)
I.e. this is the 28th Kali year of vaisvastra-Manu of which 5105 years have passed. One day of Brahma is called kapl or creation time. This kalp is made of manwantars or one thousand chaturyugs. Up to now 6 manwanars have passed. One manwantar is made of approximately 71 chaturyugs, 27 chaturyugs of vaivavat-manu have passed. In 28th also, three yugas (Krita, Treta, and Dwapar) have passed. Of the fourth Kaliyug also 5105 years have passed as on 04.04.1004. On calculation, it is observed that the origin of man is 1,97,29,40,105 (one arab, ninety seven crores, twenty nine lakhs forty thousand one hundred and five) years old as on today.

I hope this explains everything
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top