Verbum Caro:
You are quite right, however, in noting the remarkable truth that we have, as part of our nature an END which, by our nature, we are INCAPABLE OF ATTAINING.
And would that not set us apart from animals and angels, who are naturally capable of achieving all their natural ends?
Even Aquinas in that quote mentions we are not capable of our purely *natural *end without divine assistance! It seems that–although this is not dogmatic by any means–humans would only arrive at a purely natural end if they died in Original Sin only (Limbo), which is only possible if they either never reach the age of reason (babies/young children) or are never given reason during their life time (mentally handicapped).
itsjustdave1988:
Our engine is capable, but was not created with unlimited capability so as to attain our supernatural end without supernatural help.
But are we even capable of attaining our purely *natural *end? If we are incapable of avoiding mortal sin without supernatural grace, then don’t we ‘naturally’ forfeit even our natural happiness? Aquinas suggests that even for the right ordering of our natural faculties we need God’s help–unless perhaps, those who die in Original Sin only, go to a place of ‘perfect natural happiness’ i.e. Limbo. The contradiction there is that would be reserved only to undeveloped or handicapped human beings (a fully developed, healthy human being is incapable of attaining his natural end).
As for other creatures, all are dependent upon God for their very existence, even the continuation of their existence. Plants, animals, angels, humans, every existing thing can only exist if God continuously wills their existence. Thus, there does not exist any creation that does not depend upon God for both their natural good and, if possible, their supernatural good. In the natural order, the dependency is still sometimes called grace, but it is not a supernatural grace. In the supernatural order, both angels and humans must depend upon supernatural grace.
Certainly, we all need God to continue to exist, as He is the Creator and Sustainer of all Life–but it seems that for animals and angels, this is accomplished in the medium of their own created nature. God uses nature to help creatures attain their natural ends. Humans, however, seem to require a constant
supernatural intervention from their Creator in order to attain their *natural *end (our supernatural end aside). Isn’t that unique?
All creatures need direct divine aid to attain their natural good, as well as supernatural good. We don’t have a pure natural engine (nor does any other creation) that doesn’t require continual “maintenance” or Divine Concurrence by God.
Ok. It’s clear that God works directly through nature to help all creatures attain their natural ends, and works supernaturally to help rational creatures attain their supernatural ends. Even so, I still see humans as the only creatures requiring supernatural help to attain even their natural end.
Allow me to re-phrase:
*“I still find it odd that we are the only living beings whose pure
nature is not capable of attaining its **natural *
good without supernatural aid.”
Perhaps it was because all angles sealed their own fate where as you and I suffer from the sin of Adam and Eve.
*Exactly, *Dave. We ‘suffer’ from Original Sin. But what is Original Sin? It is simply our own nature without supernatural and preternatural aid! We are the *only *living creatures who are not even *naturally *capable of attaining our
natural good! We alone, are intrinsically
crippled, and therefore are the only creatures who justify the need for a Divine Redeemer!
(I realise this is somewhat speculative insofar as we have limited information as to the natural capabilities of angels, but it seems to fit the puzzle as to why we have a Redeemer and they do not).
Once Adam fell, he lost all claim to his supernatural good, however, he even lost the ability to attain his *natural *good, and therefore God gave him and Eve an offer of redemption. Since
supernatural assistance is necessary for humanity’s *natural *good, redemption automatically opens the door again, for our
supernatural good. Does that make any sense (i’m not entirely sure myself)?
Could it be precisely because our human nature is inherently flawed, that God saw fit to ‘redeem’ us, since we are incapable of saving ourselves without *
supernatural *divine assistance?
I have an answer to your other questions in my noggin’ but it’ll have to wait, as I’m heading out to watch my daughter’s play.
Great! I won’t be able to read it for a while though, since I’m flying to Rome today, for Holy Week
God bless, and Happy Easter!