O
Other_Eric
Guest
In this instance, the issue of same-sex attraction is peripheral to the means in which the illusion of a “pregnant man” was achieved. The fact of Thomas Beatie’s pregnancy exists entirely separate from questions concerning homosexuality or the practice of such. Were Beatie single instead of engaged in her current pantomime of marriage, she might still choose to impregnate herself in this way. Therefore, the of the issues that brought the pregnancy about, homosexuality cannot, strictly speaking, be one of them.You forgot to mention that it is a woman who is “married” to a woman. That is the sin of homosexuality.
In her desire to have her disorder normalized, she attempted a sex change. In her selfishness she didn’t really want to be a man, just sort of, she still wanted to have the right to bear a child, without a husband. She and her “wife” purchased the sperm donation to avoid any semblance of normalcy, all in an attempt to make normal something that is clearly disordered.
God save the baby.![]()