E
EricF
Guest
In light of the 25th Capter of Matthew, for me, not helping in some way is problematic.
The positive obligations of the law are not as black and white as the negative.What is your point?
It may not be the best course. It might be a bad idea in some cases. But I don’t see a basis for your your absolute statement.I believe directly giving money is a mistake.
It’s very location dependent. In the American northern states, help is there for those who seek it. There are shelters, food pantries and generally a strong social safety network. This works less well in rural areas, but it’s there. With the exception of the Indian rez it’s much harder for someone to truly have nowhere to go. Granted it may be less than ideal, but there is help.JamalChristophr:![]()
It may not be the best course. It might be a bad idea in some cases. But I don’t see a basis for your your absolute statement.I believe directly giving money is a mistake.
I guess if you meant it’s your view as applicable in the circumstances you encounter, I can’t much disagree. But I read you to be saying something more absolute.It’s not absolute, in the sense that I stated it was my belief, but I don’t impose it on others. Each person can do what seems right to them as a circumstance presents itself. There may be a few exceptions where I might give money, but it would be rare for me to do that.