E
EasterJoy
Guest
Actually, this is not quite true. A Catholic may not use contraception, and yet a Catholic owes a marital debt to his or her spouse. As long as the spouse who is clear on the immorality of contraception but not using it has tried to convince his or her spouse not to use illicit means of family planning, then the non-contracepting spouse does not sin by agreeing to marital relations with a spouse who employs ABC.I absolutely agree that it is hypocritical and just as immoral to refuse to wear a condom because contraception is wrong but then to go ahead and have sex as long as the wife is the one contracepting. Where is the loving partnership in that - you do the sinning and I can have the sex?
I also think it sounds like at one time you both were on the same page with ABC in your marriage and this represents a change in your thinking. You have to allow that she needs time to get to the same place you are and cutting off sexual relations now may only place an added strain at a time when you are trying to come together on such an important change in your marriage.
While I agree that his wife may need time to catch up to his thinking, he cannot force his right conscience to be violated while her incorrect conscience rules, instead.
He can satisfy his marital debt to his wife in good conscience, and indeed he still owes her that, even though she uses illicit means of contraception over his objections.
If you are saying that he ought not initiate sex when his conscience tells him that marital relations are a near occasion of sin for his wife, then that is permissible, provided that he make an effort to address the situation as soon as possible, lest she be tempted to stray elsewhere or other undue strains be put on his marriage. I don’t think that this means he may never initiate sex, only that he has a reason not to. Otherwise, the contracepting spouse basically can hold the other hostage by threatening sin every time the other asks for marital relations. That is untenable, as well.