Is It a Sin to Get Tatoos?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpKiER
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

SpKiER

Guest
Is It a Sin to Get Tatoos?

I seem to remember something about treating our bodies as God’s property not as are own if we are to be faithful christians.

I also remember a friend of mine got one while in high school and his mother hit the roof. The family was catholic and in fact, my friend went to a seminary for a while but decided that he wasn’t cut out for that type of life.

It seems that he went from one extreme to another.

Anyway, thanks for your responses!
 
I have often wondered this myself, I also heard that we are not to defile our bodies. Good Question.
 
I’m not a fan of tatoos, especially on women (and if I were younger I’d specialize in removing tatoos from women who had “grown out” of them, and I’d make millions :)). But I don’t see how it is intrinsically sinful. Where it may become sinful, IMO, is if it involves excessive pride or vanity, or a mean-spirited attitude (“up yours, world!”), or disobedience to parents. They can also be sins against modesty, when located in areas that will naturally stimulate sexual thoughts in “onlookers”.
 
I have one, and when my child is born in a few months plan on getting another. I also had mine when I was in seminary and went so far as to take one of my seminary brothers to get one while we were there. I don’t think it’s sinful to get tattoos, unless of course you get something obscene or something that would “look evil.” Getting the number 666 or something Satanic might not be the best thing to do, but I’ve seen lots of very nice religious artwork on people’s bodies. There are websites devoted entirely to Religious tats. Google that phrase and see what you get.
 
A sin? IMHO it probably depends on the tatoo. If it is a flower or “mother” probably not. If it is an inverted cross, or “God is Dead” than yes.

Unless, of course, you consider bad taste and stupidity a sin. The jury is still out on that. People who get tatoos on their young buff bodies, should remember that they will still have them in their geriatric wrinkly sagging bodies and those tatoos just won’t have the same effect. Also most tatoo parlors are not the ultimate in sterile. The guy who got the tatoo before you might have AIDS, and dirty needles are dirty needles, whatever they are used for.

Tatoos - sin, no. stupid, yes.

(No offense intended to the previous poster.)
 
This was answered in the AAA forum. Also, I would like to point out that in some states, there is a licencing board for tattoo parlours and you can ask if they have a licence. Also ask them if they autoclave their equiptment in between uses. If they won’t answer, RUN, don’t walk from the parlor.

I guess you can tell I have some inks. 😉 Before I got my first one (and all but 1 was done by the same shop) I actually watched them do a few tattoos on other customers and made my decision to get mine there after watching the care they made with sanitation (rubber gloves, spraying down work surfaces with alcohol between tattoos, washing hands every time gloves were changed, etc…)

God Bless!
Ericka
 
JMJ

Father Pacwa addresses this issue in Open Line wed. I think it was two weeks ago…?
 
Tattoos are not sinful, or at least, they are no more sinful than having a permanent mullet.

Have you ever seen one of those things after it has been in the body for 50 years? Man, there’s going to be a lot of old women with ugly ink all over 'em. Yuck. Talk about buyer’s remorse! The men won’t be any better, but I’m used to seeing ugly old men.
 
Is It a Sin to Get Tatoos?

I seem to remember something about treating our bodies as God’s property not as are own if we are to be faithful christians.

I also remember a friend of mine got one while in high school and his mother hit the roof. The family was catholic and in fact, my friend went to a seminary for a while but decided that he wasn’t cut out for that type of life.

It seems that he went from one extreme to another.

Anyway, thanks for your responses!
Interesting answers. I could have sworn it was taboo!

By the way, the tatoo was a profile of a devil’s head and he added a scroll below it. He was going to put his fiancee’s name in the scroll but I talked him out of it. I said “What if you break up with her. If you ever go out with someone else they will have that staring back at them.” Common sense ruled and he left it blank.

This was in the early 70’s. I also remembered talking to him about having a fiancee sign a paper that if ever you divorced, each person could keep what they brought into the marriage. He swore that no woman would ever sign such an agreement. Then 20 years pass and the pre nup became popular. My, how things have changed!
 
I found this on another website. Pretty interesting

Are Tattoos Suitable for Catholics?

Dear TIA,

A friend has asked me to inquire as to whether or not the Church has ever spoken clearly regarding what has become almost an obsession today, that is, tattoos, of all kinds and sizes and themes, on their bodies, particularly by teenagers.

Her daughter’s friend has gotten a huge one on her back, with a so-called Christian theme, no less, and she wondered if it was ok to do that. Her mother’s immediate response, of course, if it was on her back, who would see it except when she went swimming!

This is a very troubling ‘fad’ today, and I also really want to know what the Church may have pronounced about it.

Can you direct me to a source of information about this subject?
Code:
 Thank you. God bless you. 

 L.S.
Fr. Stephen Somerville responds:

Dear L.S.,

When your question on the subject of tattoos was proposed to me by the editor of the TIA website, it came to my mind that there is a certain similarity between the effect of tattoos on the body of a person and the effects of the Sacraments on the soul of a Catholic.

The Holy Catholic Church, extension of Jesus Christ in time and space, invites men to Baptism and Confirmation, Sacraments that confer an indelible permanent mark, called by theologians a “character,” on the soul of the believer. Tattooing confers likewise an indelible mark on the body of a person. That mark may be offensive to Christ.

The tattoo is on the body, but may well influence the soul. St. Paul tells us: “Know you not, that your (bodily) members are the temple of the Holy Ghost, who is in you, whom you have from God, and you are not your own (property)? For you are bought with a great price. Glorify and bear God in your body.” (1 Cor 6:19-20). Such is the Christian. Surely tattoo marks on the body are unseemly, if not actually offensive to God’s temple.

Is this opinion supported by Scriptures? Was tattooing an issue before Christ came to call and incorporate and spiritually mark His followers? Yes, it was.

From ancient times, pagan peoples would gash their bodies when mourning a deceased person or honoring a pagan god. We recall the false prophets of Baal on the one hand, and Elias, prophet of the true God. Elias challenged them to bring down fire from Heaven upon their altar of sacrifice, and they responded with hours of chanting, leaping and “cutting themselves after their manner with knives” (3 Kings 18:28). But no fire came until Elias alone called it down from the true God of Israel (v. 38).

We are not astonished to see that Moses, God’s great lawmaker, had legislated long before: “You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, neither shall you make on yourselves any figures or marks. I am the Lord” (Lev. 19:28). So, Moses forbade the Israelites not only to cut themselves, but also to make upon their bodies figures or marks. Here the practice of tattooing is clearly ruled out. This prohibition would help save the Israelites from imitating the false and depraved customs of their pagan neighbors.

Pope Pius XII, speaking in 1945 to sporting enthusiasts and athletes, noted their care for the body. Now this care can become a cult, that is, a false worship of the self if the athlete is an atheist and materialist, worshipping the perfect body of flesh. But the Catholic sees the human body as created by God to be the last and highest of all visible things, as God’s masterpiece, made “in the image and likeness of God” with its spiritual soul informing it. This human body should not be disfigured.

The Jews were commanded by God to make only one cutting mark, which was the circumcision for male infants, a symbol of cutting away sin. For the Catholic infant (or adult) at Baptism, the important mark is the sign of the Cross, with holy oil and the thumb of the priest, on forehead, breast and back. St. Paul wrote: “I bear the marks of the Lord Jesus in my body” (Gal 6:17). Before and after praying, we regularly mark ourselves with the Sign of the Cross.

Is, then, the mark of tattooing lawful for the Catholic? Not wishing to exaggerate what may be a small matter, I judge that I speak with the mind of the Church when I say that tattooing is at least unseemly for a Catholic. It surely could weaken Faith in Christ for one to place a non-Christ permanent mark on his body. Our body is the temple of the Holy Ghost, says St. Paul. Let that temple be preserved from unworthy marks.
Code:
 In Christ Jesus, 

 Fr. Stephen Somerville
 
Fr. Somerville’s response is a little troubling… before I converted I got a [small] tattoo with my college fraternity of the greek letters (old tradition dating back over a century). Not exactly Christian, but would that be sinful - or even ‘unseemly’?
 
It seems as if mistreating your body is sinful, obesity, plastic surgery, any piercings, and anything else would be equally as bad. If not, I think people just single out tattoos because they’re very taboo in other generations.
 
Maybe the tatoo got a bad reputation because of the numbers tatooed on the prisoners of concentration camps.
 
I know we aren’t permitted to get satanic tattoos, but what about zodiac tattoos? I don’t believe in astrology, but I like the fact I was born under cancer. I’ve always wanted to get a crab tattoo to represent that constellation.
 
The closest thing I could find on it is in Leviticus 19:28 where it says Do not lacerate yours bodies for the dead, and do not tatto yourselves. I am the Lord.
 
My view on this is that as some posters have said, the body belongs to God, and not us. However, God gives freedom to us as stewards of our own bodies. We should learn to take care of them while we’re in it.

I don’t see it that all tattoos are “sinful”. If the tattoo is dedicated to the Lord, and not to misuse our temporary authority over it, it should be fine.

I am considering getting a tattoo for myself, in commemoration of my journey with Christ. To me, it will always be a visible sign and reminder of His presence in my life. And when people ask me about it, everything I share will be focused on Him and my journey with Him, nothing else. Apart from being a sign of God’s presence in my life, the tattoo now also becomes an instrument of evangelisation.

Personally, I think smoking and drugs and failure to take care of the body is worse. These are not visible but deadlier. This is NO OFFENCE to smokers. Please don’t take any… 🙂

What do you guys think?
 
Sin…No
Stupid…Yes
Would you like to share your thoughts on why it’s not a sin and why it’s stupid in your opinion? You sound quite sure that you speak an objective truth. How does having tattoos imply one’s level of intelligence?

We’re here to share and converse, shall we do so in peace and love please?
 
I don’t care to pitch in on if getting tattoo is a sin or not.

I believe tatoos are in poor taste, however, and I’d like to state that. I can’t image the point of a tattoo except to glorify your body in what seems a solipsistic endeavor.

That said I know everybody is getting one these days. It’s a fad, and a pointless one if your idea is the glory of God not yourself. Plus, fads will pass.

As it is, if I see a tattoo on your body I automatically think less of you. You paid money for that pointless exercise in self aggrandizement? What a waste; I just suppose you thought it was a cool thing to do at the time.

Women without tattoos are sexier. Can’t speak for the sexiness of men.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top