L
laircy
Guest
Perhaps this title question is slightly different than the situation I am about to describe, but I’d appreciate an answer to both.
This is kind of a confusing situation. Say there was an oath a person took, and was being asked questions under oath, and had to say yes or no.
The person was asked a question and had a general idea of what it meant, but wasn’t entirely sure and thought it could have meant something else. If it had meant that something else, they should have said yes. But they said no, and didn’t ask for clarification. But it turns out the question didn’t mean what they thought it could have meant. In saying no, they were actually correct.
Still, this person is worrying they might have lied under oath. I told this person it was not actually lying, but it does seem like a complicated issue. It seems as though it could be a case of violating an ill-formed conscience. Is this the case? If not, is it still a sin of some sort? And if it is, to what degree is violating one’s conscience (that turned out to be wrong) a sin?
This is kind of a confusing situation. Say there was an oath a person took, and was being asked questions under oath, and had to say yes or no.
The person was asked a question and had a general idea of what it meant, but wasn’t entirely sure and thought it could have meant something else. If it had meant that something else, they should have said yes. But they said no, and didn’t ask for clarification. But it turns out the question didn’t mean what they thought it could have meant. In saying no, they were actually correct.
Still, this person is worrying they might have lied under oath. I told this person it was not actually lying, but it does seem like a complicated issue. It seems as though it could be a case of violating an ill-formed conscience. Is this the case? If not, is it still a sin of some sort? And if it is, to what degree is violating one’s conscience (that turned out to be wrong) a sin?