Is it Acceptable to Believe Only Catholics ARE Saved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PietroPaolo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
All of this is a bit beside the point though, which is whether or not the position I’ve staked out is orthodox. I’m not saying it is the only orthodox position or that all Catholics must hold it (those are different arguments). The question here is a different one altogether.

Think of limbo. If I asked whether it is permissible for Catholics to believe unbaptized babies don’t go to heaven an answer wouldn’t be to dispute whether or not limbo is the actual fate of unbaptized babies. You’re not grappling with my actual question.

The closest you get is in pointing out that God wills all to be saved. However, it doesn’t follow that all are actually saved. God also wills that we decide whether or not we are saved. Thus it is our will, not His, that ultimately decides our fate. Its like a marriage. Both parties have to be willing to get married for a marriage to take place. There has to be 2 yeses. God answers “yes” to everyone. But it doesn’t then follow that everyone answers “yes” to God. With only one “yes” (God’s) a person can’t be saved.
From your description of call and response through free will above, and from the things I and others have been posting, my opinion in regard to your question:
… whether it is permissible to believe that only Catholics are in fact saved.
it seems no, that is not compatible with Catholic teaching, which is based on the Gospel.
 
i don’t think this is acceptable catholic thought because it is judgmental.
While we can’t judge individual persons (which is another reason why I think we were right to change the original “no non-Catholics are saved” to “very few non-Catholics are saved”), there is nothing I know of in Catholic teaching that forbids judgment on theological issues. If such was the case all the Doctors of the Church were unacceptable to Catholic thought for being judgmental!
 
This is highly problematic.** You are suggesting that Christ; by founding the Church, assuring her teaching of truth, and by providing the Sacraments - including the Eucharist; is actually making it harder for people to be saved.** If that was the case, He would have done better to never found the Church at all and leave everyone in their own pagan religions to be saved by their own “good will.”

But really, this is beside the point being discussed here. Which is simply whether the following position:

Most non-Catholics will not be saved.

Is a permissible theological opinion for a Catholic. I’m arguing that it is. I’m not arguing that it is the only permissible theological opinion for Catholics, but I am arguing that it is within the realm of orthodoxy.
I am not suggesting that at all. You are making assumptions.

I am suggesting that baptised CATHOLICS make it harder for themselves by not adhering to the teachings and taking a cafeteria style approach to Sacraments and doctrines. Jesus has provided the resources via the Church, baptised Catholics are not taking advantage of it. Free will and all.

Most baptised Catholics will not be saved. (this is in response to your third sentence). Your theological opinion may be correct however judging from recent surveys, it doesn’t translate to reality, it doesn’t connect to what is happening on the ground. Most baptised Catholics do not practice the faith, the survey showed that they rock up for Easter/Christmas Mass or their babies baptism out of tradition and do as they please for the rest of the year.
 
From your description of call and response through free will above, and from the things I and others have been posting, my opinion in regard to your question:

it seems no, that is not compatible with Catholic teaching, which is based on the Gospel.
Okay, thats on topic. What, specifically, in the Gospel does my proposed position contradict? Just saying “the Gospel” is a bit vague.
 
This is highly problematic. You are suggesting that Christ; by founding the Church, assuring her teaching of truth, and by providing the Sacraments - including the Eucharist; is actually making it harder for people to be saved. If that was the case, He would have done better to never found the Church at all and leave everyone in their own pagan religions to be saved by their own “good will.”

But really, this is beside the point being discussed here. Which is simply whether the following position:

Most non-Catholics will not be saved.

Is a permissible theological opinion for a Catholic. I’m arguing that it is. I’m not arguing that it is the only permissible theological opinion for Catholics, but I am arguing that it is within the realm of orthodoxy.
I am going to take fundamental issue with the word “harder”. What does that mean, that salvation is harder for one person than another?
And I have to get some work done so Happy Thanksgiving to all.
 
I am not suggesting that at all. You are making assumptions.

I am suggesting that baptised CATHOLICS make it harder for themselves by not adhering to the teachings and taking a cafeteria style approach to Sacraments and doctrines. Jesus has provided the resources via the Church, baptised Catholics are not taking advantage of it. Free will and all.
Didn’t you say Catholics bear a harder burden?
Most baptised Catholics will not be saved. (this is in response to your third sentence). Your theological opinion may be correct however judging from recent surveys, it doesn’t translate to reality, it doesn’t connect to what is happening on the ground.
How does it not connect with what is happening on the ground and why does that make it unorthodox?
 
I am going to take fundamental issue with the word “harder”. What does that mean, that salvation is harder for one person than another?
And I have to get some work done so Happy Thanksgiving to all.
More difficult. The poster I was replying to said, “The burden placed on Catholics is higher” which makes it sound as if being Catholic “raised the bar” of salvation - making it harder to be saved in the Church than it would be if you were outside it.
 
Okay, thats on topic. What, specifically, in the Gospel does my proposed position contradict? Just saying “the Gospel” is a bit vague.
The basic Gospel, without getting into reams of quotations from scripture and Church documents due to time constraints.
The Good News is that Christ offers a gratuitous gift for all men of all times and places.
Catholicism is not a key card club. It is Christ’s Mystical Body which we all hope to be united with.

The Barque of St Peter. There are many people clinging to the barque who have no clue what the ship is called, but they are clinging through the grace of God. There are also many on board who are enjoying the ride, having a drink of rum, and turning a blind eye, or making it difficult for, those who are searching and clinging. Those of us on board might not see the gifts God has given to the “unwashed hordes”, to our own peril.
 
Didn’t you say Catholics bear a harder burden?

How does it not connect with what is happening on the ground and why does that make it unorthodox?
Yes I did say that, Catholics have no excuse, all the resources are at our disposal through Christ’s Church. Compared to a SDA who has no idea about the Truth of the Church and it’s role in Salvation, a Catholic can’t feign ignorance. We are all responsible for our own Salvation.

I already explained in my original answer. If the world were to end tomorrow, most baptised Catholics will not enter heaven. They are token Catholics who don’t attend Mass, receive the Sacraments or abide by the Doctrines. Sad but true.

We actually agree on the key points: there will be non-Catholics in Heaven and there will be Catholics who will not enter Heaven. The rest is a distraction.
 
The basic Gospel, without getting into reams of quotations from scripture and Church documents due to time constraints.
The Good News is that Christ offers a gratuitous gift for all men of all times and places.
Catholicism is not a key card club. It is Christ’s Mystical Body which we all hope to be united with.

The Barque of St Peter. There are many people clinging to the barque who have no clue what the ship is called, but they are clinging through the grace of God. There are also many on board who are enjoying the ride, having a drink of rum, and turning a blind eye, or making it difficult for, those who are searching. Those of us on board might not see the gifts God has given to the “unwashed hordes”, to our own peril.
The basic Gospel doesn’t include salvation for all or even for many. Every time Jesus talks about judgement He talks about people being damned - indeed He even says “many” will be damned, while only “a few” will be saved. I’m not saying being Catholic is enough to be saved - many Catholics will be damned too (some saints have even gone as far as saying the road to hell is paved with the skulls of priests), but nothing in the basic Gospel says many outside the Church will be saved. Jesus died for all, but not all will gain the benefits of that Death, such is the clear and repeated teaching of the Gospel.

I don’t see how my proposed position contradicts that.
 
Yes I did say that, Catholics have no excuse, all the resources are at our disposable through Christ’s Church. Compared to a SDA who has no idea about the Truth of the Church and it’s role in Salvation, a Catholic can’t feign ignorance. We are all responsible for our own Salvation.

I already explained in my original answer. If the world were to end tomorrow, most baptised Catholics will not enter heaven. They are token Catholics who don’t attend Mass, receive the Sacraments or abide by the Doctrines. Sad but true.
And I don’t disagree with that. My proposed position just says the same for most non-Catholics.
 
Christ does not talk about people inside and outside the church.
Fair enough, but the Church does and Christ speaks through His Church.

Besides, the silence of Christ (in the Gospels) on the issue hardly proves my proposed position is unorthodox (which is all I’m asking - I’m not asking if you think it is true, just if it is a position a Catholic is free to hold).

Think of the age of the Earth. The Catholic Church allows Catholics to be young Earthers or to be Evolutionists. Both are accepted positions within orthodoxy. My question here is similar. Are Catholics free to believe that most non-Catholics are not saved (and free to believe the opposite)? I don’t see any Church teaching that binds Catholics to having a rosy view of the salvation of those outside the Church. We can’t believe non-Catholics are necessarily damned simply for being non-Catholics (that is the heresy of Feeneyism), but we can, I’d argue, believe that most non-Catholics end up damned for other reasons (especially not having recourse to the sacrament of confession to forgive post-baptismal mortal sins).
 
I’m asking whether it is heterodox or orthodox to hold the theological opinion that few non-Catholics are saved.
Well, there are saints who speculated on the relative number who will be saved. Traditional and modern Catholic theologians have speculated with regard to the same.

I think where you run into trouble is the attempt to determine the status of the individual soul or the status of a group (non-Catholic) of souls. Only Jesus has the right to “judge the living and the dead,” as set forth in the Nicene Creed. Unless he reveals his judgment to the Church, as in the case of the Saints, there is really no way for us to know.

At best, holding to the opinion that few non-Catholics are saved is entirely speculative and doesn’t constitute knowledge. At worst, it’s a rash judgment against non-Catholics and a usurpation of Christ’s prerogative. I suppose it depends on the intention of the opinion-holder and the precise basis of the opinion.
 
it may not be the answer you were looking for though.:cool:
You certainly answered my first proposed position (and nicely at that) with the OT saints, but we’ve modified it and continued. I’m not really looking for a certain answer, just enjoying the conversation. Do you think you’ve answered the modified position? Do you think it isn’t permissible for Catholics to think most non-Catholics are not saved?
 
Well, there are saints who speculated on the relative number who will be saved. Traditional and modern Catholic theologians have speculated with regard to the same.

I think where you run into trouble is the attempt to determine the status of the individual soul or the status of a group (non-Catholic) of souls. Only Jesus has the right to “judge the living and the dead,” as set forth in the Nicene Creed. Unless he reveals his judgment to the Church, as in the case of the Saints, there is really no way for us to know.

At best, holding to the opinion that few non-Catholics are saved is entirely speculative and doesn’t constitute knowledge. At worst, it’s a rash judgment against non-Catholics and a usurpation of Christ’s prerogative. I suppose it depends on the intention of the opinion-holder and the precise basis of the opinion.
It’s absolutely speculative. I don’t think it usurps the rights of Christ anymore than believing the opposite - that many or most non-Catholics are saved.
 
It’s absolutely speculative. I don’t think it usurps the rights of Christ anymore than believing the opposite - that many or most non-Catholics are saved.
My argument is that both contentions are unacceptable, because neither constitute knowledge. Neither have any justification. In which case why would one hold such a belief?
 
My argument is that both contentions are unacceptable, because neither constitute knowledge. Neither have any justification. In which case why would one hold such a belief?
I hardly think there is no justification for my position. The Church teaches the necessity of the Church for salvation - extra ecclesium nulla salus - but recognizes that those outside the Church through no fault of their own (invincible ignorance) are not damned for finding themselves outside the Church. However, the Church also teaches that the Sacraments are the primary way God has chosen to give us His grace - and we know salvation is through grace alone. Thus, those without the sacraments are in an inferior position to be saved. Further, we know Christ founded the Church to help ppl attain salvation. Those outside the Church are not making use of this help and thus are again in a worse position. Finally, we know post-baptismal mortal sins must be confessed to a priest for forgiveness. Again we see non-Catholics in jeopardy of not being saved by their lack of having every thing Christ wants us to have. It is important because of the massive implications one position or the other have for Evangelization
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top