Is it all just an attitude thing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DL82
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

DL82

Guest
I was having a conversation with a friend about something entirely unrelated (it was about how the US customs officials have now started picking out ‘suspicious’ individuals at airports on the basis of whether or not they are smiling, which is just another form of cultural/racial profiling because people from the Middle East tend to look more serious than Americans) when I got to thinking:

Is much of the criticism of protestant worship among Catholics, and of ‘liturgical abuse’ among traditional Catholics, really just about our natural dispositions and attitudes?

For example, I am typically quite a solemn person. I know that. I never felt comfortable in ‘happy-clappy’ protestant worship services even when I was a protestant. At the same time, I’m not overly solemn, I still find a TLM without music a little too much for most occasions, though perhaps appropriate for Lent or for a funeral mass. I know others who find absolutely anything, the use of modern music, a priest who smiles too much, greeting eachother at the beginning of mass, etc. to be an unacceptable liturgical abuse.

I have certainly found that the masses I have attended in the United States are more upbeat, those in Ireland more parochial and those here in the UK more solemn. Surely that’s just a result of the culture of these places, and doesn’t invalidate anything done in any of these settings.

Doesn’t it just come down to individuals and cultures? Some things really REALLY matter in worship, e.g. that it is conducted by a validly ordained priest, that the words of consecration are said, that people revere the Blessed Sacrament. But then, whether people choose to kneel in solemn contemplation for hours before mass or to dance around singing lively worship songs as the priest processes into church, is surely just a matter of personal taste and personality? If we’re praising God, do you think he’s really concerned by these kinds of ‘abuses’?

Clearly, there is a time and a place for everything, and there is a time for solemnity. Isn’t there a risk though of imposing our own personality types or cultural values upon the Divine Liturgy of the Mass, which is ultimately for God, and for all the peoples of the earth. Of course, this cuts both ways, it’s just as easy for charismatics and traditionalists to want everyone to be the same.

Anyway, it’s just a thought. 🤷
 
[Edited by Moderator]

You might do well to read two of Pope Benedict’s books on the Mass: A New Song for the Lord and The Spirit of the Liturgy. Personal taste should play a nominal, if any, role in the Mass. Benedict makes it very clear. The liturgy is not something that we can create and cobble up for ourselves. It is a gift that the Church gives us. It is something that we must receive.
 
The Church has given us instructions on how the mass is to be celebrated. When someone (priest, layperson) chooses to not follow those instructions, then their personal preference has taken over and crosses into abuse.
 
[Edited by Moderator]

You might do well to read two of Pope Benedict’s books on the Mass: A New Song for the Lord and The Spirit of the Liturgy. Personal taste should play a nominal, if any, role in the Mass. Benedict makes it very clear. The liturgy is not something that we can create and cobble up for ourselves. It is a gift that the Church gives us. It is something that we must receive.
The Church allows a great deal of latitude in how the ordinary rite of the Mass is licitly celebrated. There are a number of choices that can be made without deforming the Mass.

Yes Masses can most certainly (and properly) take on upbeat, parochial, solemn, traditional and/or charismatic tones. The Sunday 7am Mass at my parish (rather solemn) looks a great deal different than the 6 pm Mass ( very lively/charismatic) but both are celebrated according to the rubrics without abuse.
 
The Church allows a great deal of latitude in how the ordinary rite of the Mass is licitly celebrated. There are a number of choices that can be made without deforming the Mass.

Yes Masses can most certainly (and properly) take on upbeat, parochial, solemn, traditional and/or charismatic tones. The Sunday 7am Mass at my parish (rather solemn) looks a great deal different than the 6 pm Mass ( very lively/charismatic) but both are celebrated according to the rubrics without abuse.
I respectfully disagree with your statements. If this “great deal of latitude” exists, please explain why documents such as Redemptionis Sacramentum came into being. Furthermore, please explain why the Linemata that the Synod Fathers used talked about so many shadows in the liturgy and why Pope Benedict had to issue the document called Sacramentum Caritatis.

What you have stated is misleading.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top