Is it moral to use money for luxuries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fakename
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

fakename

Guest
Is it moral to use money on luxuries, i.e. things that make you feel good w/o being needed for survival?

I think that it is, but given that there are poor people, would it be immoral? Would it be moral to only save this money to alleviate poverty?
 
Is it moral to use money on luxuries, i.e. things that make you feel good w/o being needed for survival?

I think that it is, but given that there are poor people, would it be immoral? Would it be moral to only save this money to alleviate poverty?
I was raised by European parents in the UD and educated in a parochial school of a Jesuit parish, way before Vatican II. In Catholicism, there is nothing wrong with using ones honestly acquired wealth for luxuries as long as one reasonably supports Mother Church financially and gives appropriate alms to the poor. The amounts or percentages of ones wages or wealth is up to the conscience of the individual.
Any other dictate is secular and smacks of socialism, which is diametrically opposed to Catholic belief and is sinful.
 
Of course you can use your own money for nice things.

We are not socialists or communists.
 
Pope Leo XIII wrote an encyclical, Rerum Novarum, about 120 years ago. As most know, encyclicals are interpretations of various Bible passages and thus, footnoted to the Bible. Since Leo XIII there have been at least 6 more encyclicals from succeeding Popes dealing with social justice.

It is perfectly acceptable to reap the reward of our honest endeavors and to pass along our estates to our heirs. We also have a duty to use our money wisely. If we employ others, we must pay them a living wage if we can. Back in 1890 that was not always done.

We are obligated by one of the Precepts of the Church to support the church financially. And we are morally obligated to also support charitable works.

As to luxuries - somebody has to be employed to make them, to transport them, to sell them, to keep them in good repair. Often used luxuries, in good condition, are sold at reduced cost to those who could not afford the original retail price.

I personally think that our attitude toward wealth is important. Are we unduly proud of it? Do we think better of ourselves and so much less of those who lack wealth? Do we realize that our success is indeed a gift from God? Are we grateful? Do we see money as a tool that should be employed wisely? Many of the uber rich set up foundations to assist the less fortunate. Do we have a regular program to share our more modest income? There is more moral value in giving willing as compared to waiting to be taxed by a secular government.

I think it would be immoral if one spent money on luxuries at the expense of not providing for the necessities of one’s family.
 
Is it moral to use money on luxuries, i.e. things that make you feel good w/o being needed for survival?

I think that it is, but given that there are poor people, would it be immoral? Would it be moral to only save this money to alleviate poverty?
It is not immoral to use your own money to buy luxuries.
 
Two of the cardinal virtues are Temperance and Prudence. If one is intemperant and or imprudent, one may also be in danger of sin - some degree of immoral behavior.

As free people, I think we are obliged to provide for ourselves as best we can all the days of our lives. Living with too much debt brought on by buying luxuries we otherwise could not afford seems to be dangerous behavior.

For example: Old school used to say that one can afford a home that is 2 1/2 times one’s annual income. So $80,000 annual income means a $200,000 home can be within one’s means. But certainly not a $400,000 home.

So luxuries come AFTER one is taking good care of one’s real needs including support of the Church and Charities, today and for however many tomorrows we may have.

I don’t think simple luxuries - beyond the normal daily needs, such as a fine dinner to celebrate an occassion, would cause any moral concern.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top