G
GreenLantern
Guest
Question’s in the title
There is no point in differentiating between them because they are both mortal sin. Even though mortal sins can vary in gravity you nevertheless are still in a state of mortal sin and if you die unrepentent in that state you go to Hell no matter what mortal sin you have committed.Question’s in the title
CCC 1864 “Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.” There are no limits to the mercy of God, but anyone who deliberately refuses to accept his mercy by repenting, rejects the forgiveness of his sins and the salvation offered by the Holy Spirit. Such hardness of heart can lead to final impenitence and eternal loss.Well if it is against the Holy spirit that is the worst sin because it can not be forgiven.
Interestingly enough that is only a theory of what blasphemy against the Holy Spirit means, even the church is not sure. I think its a good theory though. Yet it scares me, cause you never now for sure with a theory. I may have already done it, and just dont know which means everything I do is for not.CCC 1864 “Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.” There are no limits to the mercy of God, but anyone who deliberately refuses to accept his mercy by repenting, rejects the forgiveness of his sins and the salvation offered by the Holy Spirit. Such hardness of heart can lead to final impenitence and eternal loss.
CCC 1864 is not a theory. It is a Church teaching.Interestingly enough that is only a theory of what blasphemy against the Holy Spirit means, even the church is not sure. I think its a good theory though. Yet it scares me, cause you never now for sure with a theory. I may have already done it, and just dont know which means everything I do is for not.![]()
No it isnt, Im serious do a little more research on it. Three views exsist on what it canmean none have been declared false by any council or pope. For a quick run down just go to the summa. He give three views, one from the ECF, one from Augistine, and “others” all can be accebtable, we really are not sure.CCC 1864 is not a theory. It is a Church teaching.
I’m sorry but you are wrong.No it isnt, Im serious do a little more research on it. Three views exsist on what it canmean none have been declared false by any council or pope. For a quick run down just go to the summa. He give three views, one from the ECF, one from Augistine, and “others” all can be accebtable, we really are not sure.