M
mcliffor
Guest
TIME magazine recently put together an article about the Pope and Islam. One of the commentaries, written by a Muslim, was critical of the Pope for ignoring the contributions of Islam to European thought when the Pope said Europe has its roots in classical thought and Christianity, and that Europe owed it’s existing culture and being to Christianity. He brought up some interesting points, such as the contributions to European thought Muslims like Averroes made.
His conclusion was that the Pope was reading history selectively, that European society and thought has pluralistic origins, and the Pope is wrong to give all the credit to Christianity. When the Pope says the EU ought to give credit to Christianity, he’s silencing Muslim voices from the past and making Europe seem more homogeneous than it was, and that it’s wrong to not acknowledge the Muslim contributions to European culture. Ergo, Turkey should be in the EU, since to be European does not mean being Christian. What do people think of this?
His conclusion was that the Pope was reading history selectively, that European society and thought has pluralistic origins, and the Pope is wrong to give all the credit to Christianity. When the Pope says the EU ought to give credit to Christianity, he’s silencing Muslim voices from the past and making Europe seem more homogeneous than it was, and that it’s wrong to not acknowledge the Muslim contributions to European culture. Ergo, Turkey should be in the EU, since to be European does not mean being Christian. What do people think of this?