Is Jesus Actually Buddha?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jinc1019
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jinc1019

Guest
I am not sure if you have heard this argument before, but someone recently argued with me that Christianity, and possibly even parts of the Old Testament, are nothing more than borrowed stories and traditions about Buddha with name-changes to fit the Jewish perspective of the writers. Obviously I don’t believe this…but some people have written rather extensive articles on it (I have included one below) and some of the claims are definitely interesting, especially those claims about the simalarities of parables, stories, and names of apostles, etc. between Jesus and Buddha. Has anyone actually done any research on this?
 
That first link looks to me like an incoherent argument for a book that doesn’t exist. So in answer to your question, I’m going to go with “no”
 
Pish tish, Poppy-cock, and fiddle de dee! No intelligent, well educated person would fall for such nonsense!
The references cited are a clear example of someone trying to lure unsophisticated and uninformed people into believing something false.
 
Yeah, there are some pretty big differences in the points of view. The Buddha, though wise, taught a way of avoiding suffering through detachment, whereas Christianity, especially Catholicism, sees suffering very differently. Christ accepted suffering as, in my view, He knew we ourselves would experience it.

The list goes on and on. I think we as Christians agree with Buddhists on many things and I have always been welcomed by Tibetans, for instance, but theologically speaking, we’re very different.
 
I heard this before, but the thing is, the two guys lived like 500 years apart.

Their life stories are different. Buddha was a wealthy prince who only saw how the world was when he left the palace. Jesus was born part of the poor world.

Also their theology is different. You cannot be a Christian atheist, but you can be a Buddhist atheist – big difference there.
 
Nah. You can tell. One of them fasted for 40 days and died on a cross for our sins. The other one lived a life of luxury and from the looks of him never missed a meal in his life.

In all fairness to Buddha, he didn’t have Jesus Christ’s example to go by. Maybe he’d have been a Christian if he’d had the chance.

There’s not an equivalence. Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. And as this Sunday’s first reading reminds us, the Holy Spirit filled Peter gave this testimony concerning Jesus

“There is no salvation through anyone else,
nor is there any other name under heaven
given to the human race by which we are to be saved.”

As for a Catholic looking into Buddha as an interesting historical philosopher NOT in competition with Christ maybe this scripture applies

Galatians 5:16
I say, then: live by the Spirit and you will certainly not gratify the desire of the flesh.

17 For the flesh has desires against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; these are opposed to each other, so that you may not do what you want.

18 But if you are guided by the Spirit, you are not under the law.

19 Now the works of the flesh are obvious: immorality, impurity, licentiousness,
20 idolatry, sorcery, hatreds, rivalry, jealousy, outbursts of fury, acts of selfishness, dissensions, factions,
21 occasions of envy, drinking bouts, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.

22 In contrast, the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, 23 gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law.

24 Now those who belong to Christ (Jesus) have crucified their flesh with its passions and desires. 25 If we live in the Spirit, let us also follow the Spirit. 26 Let us not be conceited, provoking one another, envious of one another.

What is good in Buddhism we hold in common with it. We should always offer them Jesus in love. If Buddha is in heaven now, he’d tell ya “… It was HIM and his sacrifice on the cross that saved us.”
 
There are indeed many similarities with many ancient religions and Judaism. People say this means Judaism is not the true religion of the time, and that they borrowed from other religions. Haven’t they thought that it could be the other way around? I see all these other pagan faiths of the past as nothing more as the “Protestants” of the time. They veered from the true religion and made some changes, but still recognizable enough from the original.
 
There are indeed many similarities with many ancient religions and Judaism. People say this means Judaism is not the true religion of the time, and that they borrowed from other religions. Haven’t they thought that it could be the other way around? I see all these other pagan faiths of the past as nothing more as the “Protestants” of the time. They veered from the true religion and made some changes, but still recognizable enough from the original.
I don’t really agree with the “Protestants” comment at all, but I do agree with the idea that it may be possible Buddhists actually borrowed from Christianity…I am not saying that definitely happened, but there is certainly some very interesting simalarities.
 
You’d not be so easily confused if you had a basic grasp of the religious premises.

vaughns-1-pagers.com/religion/religions-summary.htm

No. Jesus is God.

Buddah is not God.

Nothing more need be said.
I am not sure if people are not reading the first post or are just choosing to ignore it, but as I mentioned previously, I do not believe this at all, but I obviously don’t know ANYTHING about Buddhism, so when someone comes to me and points to several quotes from Bddha that are just like Jesus and then shows that the names of the many followers of Buddha are very similar to that of Jesus’ followers, and then explains that both have strange birth narratives, and many other similarities as well, it’s hard to reply to that. Surely I can argue in favor of the history on the side of Christianity and the notion of apostolic succession, etc…but still, my main question was whether anyone actually took the time to look into this at all and come up with specific ways of refuting it?
 
I am not sure if you have heard this argument before, but someone recently argued with me that Christianity, and possibly even parts of the Old Testament, are nothing more than borrowed stories and traditions about Buddha with name-changes to fit the Jewish perspective of the writers. Obviously I don’t believe this…but some people have written rather extensive articles on it (I have included one below) and some of the claims are definitely interesting, especially those claims about the simalarities of parables, stories, and names of apostles, etc. between Jesus and Buddha. Has anyone actually done any research on this?
I’m not a scholar on this topic, only an ametur, but there are a few things I might add.

First and most obviously is this: Jesus of Nazereth is called the Christ in a way very similar to Gautama Sidhartha beig called the Buddha. Both are titles refering to a state of conscious unity with the Father or Source.

So while Jesus and Gautama are not the same person, a scholar of comparative religion could make a case that they were of a similar accomplishment in the realm of what’s called “enightenment” or “realizartion.” That is why there are conjectures around that Jesus and Gautama are “brothers.”

Second, while I’m sure there was a historical Jesus who was what in our tradition we call The Son of God, what that means has been a bit clouded by piety and the vagaries of literary style of that time, that being a lack of clarity between historical fact and spiritual guidance. In fact, there are many earlier stories than Jesus’ that involve virgin birth, miracls, death and resurrection.

I say that because the other stories are designed, as parables are, to convey an inner meaning. In those cases, the story is meant, in the hands of an adept, to be a mnemonic and a guide to a very particualr sort of inner transformation that is rarely reached. And becauser this transformation yields a state that is diffent from the ordinary one we walk around in, called “sleep” by those adepts, it is not easily understood. Even Jesus said “let the dead bury the dead.” Certaily he didn’t mean that those in graves should get out and bury the freshly passed. He was refering t the stte f “sleep” that nearly all of us walk around in thinking, unfortunately, that we are awake. If you have ever experienced an extrapordinary mental state, perhaps you have a clue as to what’s being talked about here as a permanent condition.

Anyway, since we can predicate that we are *all *made in the image and likeness of God, it is not a great leap to surmise that many books of ancient origin written as reportage and for guidance from that state of accomplishment must have similarities and use similar symbols. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they sourced each other, though that may have happened as well. I mean today we hear politicians make mistatements and then others of their party quote them as sources of fact.

Anyway, thats a start. Hope it at least stirs some a bit in thier sleep. If you say “Bit I’m not!” we may have something to look at.
 
Also, can someone actually explain why quotes from Buddha and Jesus are so similar? That was another reason I started this dialogue. I read a theory there may be a connection between Soloman and Buddha, suggesting that Buddha derived a lot of his beliefs from Jews who settled in India.
 
Also, can someone actually explain why quotes from Buddha and Jesus are so similar? That was another reason I started this dialogue. I read a theory there may be a connection between Soloman and Buddha, suggesting that Buddha derived a lot of his beliefs from Jews who settled in India.
There is a fascinating book by Faber-Kaiser called “Jesus Died in Kashmir” There are other books of similar stripe. Did you know that the monastary at Lhasa is reputed to have had quotes from a Master from the West, named Isa, who loved children, and who said things like Jesus almost verbatim?
 
One of them fasted for 40 days and died on a cross for our sins. The other one lived a life of luxury and from the looks of him never missed a meal in his life.
The Buddha also fasted. Your sources have been misleading you. The Buddha was born into luxury, but found it unsatisfactory. He then tried extreme asceticism, and found that also to be unsatisfactory:

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Then he tried the Middle Way, between the two extremes, and found enlightenment.

rossum
 
Also, can someone actually explain why quotes from Buddha and Jesus are so similar?
Perhaps because both of them saw things in the same way?

The Buddha never claimed to lay down law, he only claimed to see the way that the world worked, and to advise people how to act in accordance with that. Jesus would have seen the same world, and obviously came up with the same advice.

It is also known that there was Indian/Buddhist influence in Alexandria which may possible have penetrated into Roman Palestine. Good ideas tend to spread as people copy them.

rossum
 
…but still, my main question was whether anyone actually took the time to look into this at all and come up with specific ways of refuting it?
Though I would prefer a more patient and understanding language on this board, people are trying to tell you that there is no need to “try to refute it” because the theory has no legs. It’s simply one of those religious conspiracy theories, like Ancient Aliens or that Jesus studied yoga, that doesn’t need to be refuted.

The theologies are different. Langauges are different. Plenty of historical evidence that Jesus existed. It’s just not a serious point of discussion, and frankly, since you are outright saying that you don’t know anything about Buddhism, then that may be half the reason you feel this is an important point. I know a lot about Buddhism and could not imagine a way that this could be possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top