Is Jesus Christ and the Roman Catholic Church the only way to salvation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy_B
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
He becomes kind of like a transparent window through which we can see and hear Christ, in the sense that, when you look at a window, you normally don’t see the window, but whatever is beyond the window, and when the priest is celebrating the Sacraments, we don’t see the priest, as such (although of course he is there) but rather we see Christ through him.

And of course the priest is a human being like ourselves, and prone to flaws. The flaws we see are not flaws in Christ, but flaws in the priest himself, just as, if the window is dirty or cracked, it doesn’t mean that the landscape is dirty and cracked; it’s just the window that needs to be cleaned or repaired.
This is beautiful, with your permission I may use it with my Sunday School Class… but… All true Christians are suppose to be “Christ-like” this is what the word “Christian” means. When the world sees us… it should not really see us… but Christ… The window is a beautiful illustration of this. Thank you.
Blessings
 
This is beautiful, with your permission I may use it with my Sunday School Class… but… All true Christians are suppose to be “Christ-like” this is what the word “Christian” means. When the world sees us… it should not really see us… but Christ… The window is a beautiful illustration of this. Thank you.
Blessings
Hello submittedjoy,

I agree, we should all try to be more “Christ-like”.

Thomas à Kempis wrote about this more than 500 years ago. You might enjoy this book, the Imitation of Christ; Also here.

**http://www.catholicfirst.com/images/products/kempis1766.jpg **

God Bless You…
 
He becomes kind of like a transparent window through which we can see and hear Christ, in the sense that, when you look at a window, you normally don’t see the window, but whatever is beyond the window, and when the priest is celebrating the Sacraments, we don’t see the priest, as such (although of course he is there) but rather we see Christ through him.
What you’re describing here is a “mediator.” And Scripture explicitly states that for the church:1 Tim 2:5 "…there is one God, {and} one mediator also between God and men, {the} man Christ Jesus,"Under the Law God provided a priesthood through which Israel could approach Him through human representation. But the church, this side of the cross, has Christ Himself, our “High Priest,” our “one Mediator” who ever lives to Advocate and make intercession for us:Heb 7:23-25 “The {former} priests, on the one hand, existed in greater numbers because they were prevented by death from continuing, but Jesus, on the other hand, because He continues forever, holds His priesthood permanently. Therefore He is able also to save forever those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them.”

1 John 2:1 “My little children, I am writing these things to you so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous;”
And of course the priest is a human being like ourselves, and prone to flaws.
But you see, you (Catholicism) completely miss the whole point of the New Covenant in Christ. The day of the system of flawed, human priestly mediators ended, it’s over:Heb 7:28 "For the Law appoints men as high priests who are weak, but the word of the oath, which came after the Law, {appoints} a Son, made perfect forever."Every true believer has the right to go directly to and through his perfect Mediator.**Heb 4:16 ** “Therefore let us draw near with confidence to the throne of grace, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.”
The flaws we see are not flaws in Christ, but flaws in the priest himself, just as, if the window is dirty or cracked, it doesn’t mean that the landscape is dirty and cracked; it’s just the window that needs to be cleaned or repaired.
But that “cracked” and “dirty” window has been completely removed and replaced with an open door policy in Christ - our one, perfect Mediator. :extrahappy:
 
What you’re describing here is a “mediator.” And Scripture explicitly states that for the church:1 Tim 2:5 "…there is one God, {and} one mediator also between God and men, {the} man Christ Jesus,"Under the Law God provided a priesthood through which Israel could approach Him through human representation. But the church, this side of the cross, has Christ Himself, our “High Priest,” our “one Mediator” who ever lives to Advocate and make intercession for us:Heb 7:23-25 “The {former} priests, on the one hand, existed in greater numbers because they were prevented by death from continuing, but Jesus, on the other hand, because He continues forever, holds His priesthood permanently. Therefore He is able also to save forever those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them.”

1 John 2:1 “My little children, I am writing these things to you so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous;”
This is very Catholic of you to say! I did not know that you were so familiar with Catholic Theology! 👍
But you see, you (Catholicism) completely miss the whole point of the New Covenant in Christ.
Actually, I think it is you who have missed the whole point of Catholicism! Evidently you do not know that what you have written comes from the Catholic Church (Scripture).
The day of the system of flawed, human priestly mediators ended, it’s over:Heb 7:28 “For the Law appoints men as high priests who are weak, but the word of the oath, which came after the Law, {appoints} a Son, made perfect forever.”
Indeed, the Perfect is come! More good Catholic theology!
Every true believer has the right to go directly to and through his perfect Mediator.**Heb 4:16 ** "Therefore let us draw near with confidence to the throne of grace, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need."But that “cracked” and “dirty” window has been completely removed and replaced with an open door policy in Christ - our one, perfect Mediator. :extrahappy:
Amen! The only point that you seem to have missed is that Jesus has shared HIs priestly ministry with us, and that He calls some to join with Him in His role as mediator.
 
Amen! The only point that you seem to have missed is that Jesus has shared HIs priestly ministry with us, and that He calls some to join with Him in His role as mediator.
If indeed I have presented through the Scriptures Catholic theology, then don’t contradict it.1 Tim 2:5 “…there is one God, {and} one mediator also between God and men, {the} man Christ Jesus,” Embrace it by removing all those “dirty” and “cracked” windows and replace them with the Door provided for us:John 10:9 “I am the door; if anyone enters through Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture.”
 
This is beautiful, with your permission I may use it with my Sunday School Class… but… All true Christians are suppose to be “Christ-like” this is what the word “Christian” means. When the world sees us… it should not really see us… but Christ… The window is a beautiful illustration of this. Thank you.
Blessings
It is because of our baptism that we share in the priesthood of all believers, and of course we should all image Christ to others. The priest is more so in that he can actually speak Christ’s words to us (My body and blood; I absolve you of your sins), because he has been given this gift by Christ Himself, through the laying on of hands that goes all the way back to St. Peter himself, from when Jesus ordained him to be the chief shepherd of the Church. (See John 21:15-19.) 🙂

And yes, of course you can use this illustration in your Sunday School. May God bless those little ones, and bring each and every one of them safely into His kingdom. :signofcross:
 
guanophore;3382884]
Originally Posted by justasking4
I don’t think it is. It is impossible to know and the tragic thing with this doctrine is that it is based on speculations since there really is no way to know. This kind of thing is unnecessary since we know Jesus Himself is our great intercessor before the Father.
guanophore
When you say things like this, ja4 (“there is really no way to know”) it seems like you are denying Divine Revelation. It is as if you do not believe God is capable of revealing HImself to mankind in any way outside of the scriptures.
Quote:
Originally Posted by justasking4
It can do all the research it wants on the individual but it can never arrive at any certainity.
guanophore
Oh, I agree! Research and study cannot compare with Divine Revelation. They are important, but what God discloses abouat Himself is much more relevant than what man can acquire with his meager mind.
Where does your church claim that this is done by Divine Revelation? Is this supposedly revealed to the pope or something like that?
 
Public confession of sins was practiced since the Baptism of John. “Then went out to him Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region about the Jordan, 6 and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins.” Matt 3:4-6

It was a baptism of repentance, for the forgiveness of sins. When Jesus entered the waters of baptism, He sanctified them, so that the HS could be given at the time of baptism. He later commissioned the Apostles to forgive sins. How did you expect this was going to happen, if people did not confess?

"Many also of those who were now believers came, confessing and divulging their practices. 19 And a number of those who practiced magic arts brought their books together and burned them in the sight of all; and they counted the value of them and found it came to fifty thousand pieces of silver. 20 So the word of the Lord grew and prevailed mightily."Acts 19:18-20

Public confession of sins was practiced for centuries until allowances were made for it to be done privately.
Where do we see abosolution being given by the Baptist or in the Acts passage?
 
Originally Posted by justasking4
Where do we see abosolution being given by the Baptist or in the Acts passage?

Jesus gave the power to forgive and retain sins quite explicitly. What more do you need?
When Jesus said this there were no priest or bishops there. Secondly in those passages on the Baptist and Acts where do we see someone giving absolution?
 
When Jesus said this there were no priest or bishops there. Secondly in those passages on the Baptist and Acts where do we see someone giving absolution?
Who cares if absolution was in those passages or not? I don’t understand why that’s important to you. You must think something has to be explicitly discussed in order to be permitted. I don’t.
 
Where does your church claim that this is done by Divine Revelation? Is this supposedly revealed to the pope or something like that?
No, Divine Revelation is God’s disclosure about Himself to mankind. It began in the Garden of Eden, and has continued until the final revelation in Jesus Christ. Most of the time, such revelation defies human reason, like the burning bush, for example.

It is not “your church”, ja4, it is “ours”. There is only one Church, and all who are members of the One Body are members of it.
Where do we see abosolution being given by the Baptist or in the Acts passage?
Absolution is a pronouncement that sins are forgiven. Do you think that God did not forgive the sins of those who came to John for the Baptism of Repentance? Do you think that God did not forgive the sins of those who confessed them publicly?
When Jesus said this there were no priest or bishops there. Secondly in those passages on the Baptist and Acts where do we see someone giving absolution?
On the contrary, Jesus had already commissioned the Apostles in their priestly duties during the time of their preparation. He had taught them to do baptism, preaching, annointing/healing the sick, hearing confessions, etc. The bishops are the successors to the Apostles, and the Apostles passed on the their duties to them. I wonder what you think “absolution” means?
40.png
justasking4:
I’m pointing out to you and others that a priest hearing confessions and giving absolution is not a biblical practice. The apostles never taught such a thing. Rather forgiveness of sins can be obtained directly from God through Christ. See I John 1:9
Well, we see it differently, ja4. We see that God gave to “men” the power to forgive sins, then empowered the Apostles to forgive them. Scripture also instructs us to “confess your sins to one another, that you may be healed”. Would one not wish to make this confession to the person who had been given the authority on earth to forgive sins? This is the main problem with psychotherapy today. People go to the therapist to confess their sins, but such persons have not been empowered by God to forgive sins! Forgiveness is obtained directly from God through Christ. Jesus set it up so that His representatives could transfer the grace of His forgiveness in a personal way.
 
Originally Posted by justasking4
When Jesus said this there were no priest or bishops there. Secondly in those passages on the Baptist and Acts where do we see someone giving absolution?

sodak
Who cares if absolution was in those passages or not? I don’t understand why that’s important to you. You must think something has to be explicitly discussed in order to be permitted. I don’t.
I’m pointing out to you and others that a priest hearing confessions and giving absolution is not a biblical practice. The apostles never taught such a thing. Rather forgiveness of sins can be obtained directly from God through Christ. See I John 1:9
 
guanophore;3394419]
Originally Posted by justasking4
Where does your church claim that this is done by Divine Revelation? Is this supposedly revealed to the pope or something like that?
guanophore
No, Divine Revelation is God’s disclosure about Himself to mankind. It began in the Garden of Eden, and has continued until the final revelation in Jesus Christ. Most of the time, such revelation defies human reason, like the burning bush, for example.
Don’t you claim that your church continues to recieve something like revelations in its development of doctrine theory? The proclaimation of the assumption of Mary in the 1950’s would be an example of this.
It is not “your church”, ja4, it is “ours”. There is only one Church, and all who are members of the One Body are members of it.
Do you consider protestant churches true churches?

Did not the pope recently claim there are no real protestant churches but they are “ecceliastical communities”?
 
Code:
Don't you claim that your church continues to recieve something like revelations in its development of doctrine theory?
No. The public revelation ceased with the death of the last Apostle. There do continue to be revelations, but they are private, given to individuals. Developlment of doctrine has to do with the improved understanding over time of what Jesus revealed. There are some things that were not ready to be made clear, or understood, and the clarity did not come until later.
The proclaimation of the assumption of Mary in the 1950’s would be an example of this.
No, this is not “new” revelation. This is contained in the beliefs of the Church since the time of the Apostles. The reason it was “proclaimed” was to put to rest doubts and confusion about what was believed. Same as the proclamation of the canon. The books that are considered inspired have been agreed upon by the Church since the early years, but it became necessary to spell it out due to heresies that emerged. The same applies to the Trinity, which was believed and taught by the Apostles, but had to be defined and the doctrine developed due to heresies that emerged.
Do you consider protestant churches true churches?
Scripture is plain that there is only One Body, One Faith, One Lord. There is only One Church. All who are validly baptized are members of the One Church.
Did not the pope recently claim there are no real protestant churches but they are “ecceliastical communities”?
Yes. This is based on the NT, which says that Jesus only built one church. Not “churches”. The Catholic Church teaches that there is no salvation outside the Church because there is only One Church.
 
I’m pointing out to you and others that a priest hearing confessions and giving absolution is not a biblical practice. The apostles never taught such a thing. Rather forgiveness of sins can be obtained directly from God through Christ. See I John 1:9
Ok, I think I see where you are coming from.

First of all, I disagree that it’s not a biblical practice. You and I probably won’t agree on that, unless you change your mind.

Second, I don’t care if it’s a biblical practice or not. If the Church that gave us the bible, who happens to be the Bride of Christ, instituted by him, tells us that it’s necessary, then it is. You worry about whether or not something is explicit in the bible. I don’t. I let the author, editor, and interpreter of the bible teach me. That is where we differ.

There are many non-biblical practices out there, like, accepting Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior. That exact prescription isn’t in the bible and is therefore non-biblical also.
 
sodak;3394532]
Originally Posted by justasking4
I’m pointing out to you and others that a priest hearing confessions and giving absolution is not a biblical practice. The apostles never taught such a thing. Rather forgiveness of sins can be obtained directly from God through Christ. See I John 1:9
sodak
Ok, I think I see where you are coming from.
First of all, I disagree that it’s not a biblical practice. You and I probably won’t agree on that, unless you change your mind.
The only way i could change my mind is by facts. You evidently don’t need to facts to support your beliefs but rely on your authority whether there are facts or not.
sodak
Second, I don’t care if it’s a biblical practice or not. If the Church that gave us the bible, who happens to be the Bride of Christ, instituted by him, tells us that it’s necessary, then it is. You worry about whether or not something is explicit in the bible. I don’t. I let the author, editor, and interpreter of the bible teach me. That is where we differ
.
The church that you claim is the author of scripture (which they are not) warns of false teachers who will come into the church itself and decieve many. To not care if a pracitice is biblical or not is to allow false teachers into your church.
sodak
There are many non-biblical practices out there, like, accepting Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior. That exact prescription isn’t in the bible and is therefore non-biblical also.
If what you say is true what am i to make of Romans 10:9-10 which says-
-9 that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved;
10 for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he confesses, resulting in salvation.

This would be one passage in Scripture that i would think even most catholics would agree that Christ is Lord and Savior.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top