Is Jesus Christ and the Roman Catholic Church the only way to salvation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy_B
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’d like to know how difficult it is to acquire a bible in India. Surely it can’t be that hard, there are also plenty of christian churches to choose from as well. They cannot say they have no chance at exposure to the gospel, it’s everywhere these days.
Less than three percent of the population in India is Christian. They are continually bombing Catholic churches and murdering Catholic priests, because they are a threat to the caste system, and to the system of oppression against women. It’s difficult to convince a woman that she is merely a talking farm animal when a Catholic priest is offering to baptize her and teach her the Catechism just like a regular human being.
 
Less than three percent of the population in India is Christian. They are continually bombing Catholic churches and murdering Catholic priests, because they are a threat to the caste system, and to the system of oppression against women. It’s difficult to convince a woman that she is merely a talking farm animal when a Catholic priest is offering to baptize her and teach her the Catechism just like a regular human being.
My respect for India as a nation has just been put below wale exrement, I hate the visual you placed in my mind, but I thank you for educating me along the matter.
 
This is what the catechism says:

847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:

Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.337
848 "Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men."338

I am not in disagreement with this.

Parts I would highlight most especially are the phrases ‘in ways known to himself God…’

which I think strongly implies a way in which is to be extraordinary (ie. that which is in a way other than how christians are normally saved and going to heaven). The reason why these ways are different must invariably be because like Abraham who died in his sins, none of these people have knowledge of the gospel.

Perhaps they, like Abraham did, go to hell now and are given a chance to hear the gospel in the underworld?

Perhaps they go to hell now, and are given a chance to hear the gospel preached, repent and believe at the resurrection?

I am not in disagreement that those who would accept the gospel but could not, God would give them a chance to do so somehow or someway. Which is what the catechism says that you think I am in disagreement with.

What I do know with certainty is that without Jesus and His grace all men remain sinners, and with that sin they cannot come to the Father. No one goes to the Father but through Him, and if you do not believe that Jesus is he you will die in your sins.

Non-christians cannot inherit salvation, they must become christian in order to do so.

Krishna is an idol of the Hindu religion. Like Zeus or Jupiter, he is not God, nor a god. I am also not convinced that honouring Krishna is a sincere attempt at obeying God.
I don’t think Abraham went to Hell. Once in Hell, always in Hell. When I was a child, I always pictured those who died before Christ’s death as being in sort of a holding pen, until God decided what to do with them. Chidlish, huh?

As you quoted:
847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:

Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.337

If one believes that those not Catholic go to Hell then I would say they are denying what the Church has stated. We cannot make that final judgement. Only God can mke that final judgement and God is all merciful.🙂 Peace
 
I don’t think Abraham went to Hell. Once in Hell, always in Hell. When I was a child, I always pictured those who died before Christ’s death as being in sort of a holding pen, until God decided what to do with them. Chidlish, huh?

As you quoted:
847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:

Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.337

If one believes that those not Catholic go to Hell then I would say they are denying what the Church has stated. We cannot make that final judgement. Only God can mke that final judgement and God is all merciful.🙂 Peace
You know this is certainly not the first time people have made these accusations that I’m not following the church. This week as I was arguing this I picked up my bible and opened it at random and I came to the story of St Paul’s imprisonment in Jerusalem in the Acts of the Apostles, what particularly struck out at me in his defence was when he was saying that he was upholding the entirety of the faith of their ancestors that he was being accused of corrupting. I don’t think it was coincidence that I opened to that either.

No, my friend, the tradition is that they did indeed go to hell, or sheol, or the underworld, I have heard it said though that this hell is understood to be a different place than final damnation, which as you say there is no return, what I would point out though is that there does not appear to be differentiation between where the wicked and the righteous go before Jesus:

Psalm 6:4 Turn, O LORD, and deliver me; save me because of your unfailing love. 5 No one remembers you when he is dead. Who praises you from the grave?

In the first verse we see here that where they go when they die they no longer remember God and do not praise him.

Psalm 16:8 I have set the LORD always before me. Because he is at my right hand, I will not be shaken. 9 Therefore my heart is glad and my tongue rejoices; my body also will rest secure, 10 because you will not abandon me to the grave, nor will you let your Holy One see decay

In the second verse I quote we discover the hope that those in the old covenant had that they would not be abandoned to sheol, but would raise up from it.

Psalm 49:10 For all can see that wise men die; the foolish and the senseless alike perish and leave their wealth to others. 11 Their tombs will remain their houses forever, their dwellings for endless generations, though they had named lands after themselves. 12 But man, despite his riches, does not endure; he is like the beasts that perish. 14 Like sheep they are destined for the grave, and death will feed on them. The upright will rule over them in the morning; their forms will decay in the grave, far from their princely mansions. 15 But God will redeem my life from the grave; he will surely take me to himself. Selah

Third verse, the same hope is present, that the life of the righteous person will be redeemed from the grave while the tombs of the ‘foolish and senseless’ ‘will remain their houses forever’. I think this implies that both the righteous and wicked went to the same place prior to Jesus does it not? I say this because there is no differentiation anywhere that I can find, and they even use the same words and wording for describing where they both go, the difference is that one suffers final damnation while the other will be one day redeemed from that place.

Psalm 88:3 For my soul is full of trouble and my life draws near the grave. 4 I am counted among those who go down to the pit; I am like a man without strength. 5 I am set apart with the dead, like the slain who lie in the grave, whom you remember no more, who are cut off from your care. 6 You have put me in the lowest pit, in the darkest depths… 10 Do you show your wonders to the dead? Do those who are dead rise up and praise you? Selah 11 Is your love declared in the grave, your faithfulness in Destruction? 12 Are your wonders known in the place of darkness, or your righteous deeds in the land of oblivion?

Fourth verse, ‘land of oblivion’, ‘place of darkness’, ‘remember no more’, ‘who are cut off from your care’, ‘in the lowest pit, in the darkest depths,’ - in a word, hell

I could keep quoting but I’ll stop.

We cannot go to heaven unless we are freed from sin, and we cannot be freed from sin in any other way than Jesus. Hence, all these righteous men in the old testament, despite their faithfulness nevertheless having inherited original sin and committed sins died in that sin without His grace which had not come to the world. The same is likewise true of all non-christians, no matter how righteous they may be.

I am not in opposition to what the church teaches, because I do think that these people in the words of the catechism may indeed somehow find salvation if given opportunity, but I know for a fact that you need to be christian in order to enter heaven. I don’t know how they will get there, I simply put forward theories that perhaps they go through something like what Abraham went through, or perhaps they will believe at the resurrection and then inherit salvation. I don’t deny that they may indeed find salvation (which is what the catechism says) at same point in the future, but I know that unless they become christian somehow, they cannot inherit eternal life.

How do you suppose that the tradition of the church holds that infants dying without baptism do not inherit salvation? I think that must be considered similarily to people who never encountered the gospel.

And I agree God is the only judge of this and all things are possible with God.

Peace be with you,
 
The catechism does not refute what I say, it says that in ways known to God that somehow these people may still be saved. If the catechism had meant that Hindus, Jews, atheists, Muslims or satanists, each holding to their conscience and respecting their own erroneous view of the truth, all went to heaven immediately after they died just as did a christian saint, then I think it would have said that. It does not, instead it says, ‘in ways known to God’.

None of those people could go to heaven unless they, as Abraham had to, have knowledge of the gospel and believed. Until then they remain in their sins.

What the catechism says in the section I quote is that the affirmation that ‘outside the church there is no salvation’ is not directed against those who could not have come to the gospel. It is not, however, aimed at discounting the affirmation that 'outside Jesus there is no salvation;, because truth be told outside Jesus there is no salvation. It does not matter.

Going to heaven is not a right, it is a gift which is given by his grace which comes to some sooner and to others later.

I think you are in opposition to the gospel itself, because Jesus really did say that unless you believe that I am he, you will die in your sins (John 8:24). There is a possibility of salvation outside the church in ways known to God, but there is no salvation outside Jesus Christ.
**I would agree with the above quote and add the following two verses, which may have already been cited in this thread (sorry, I didn’t read all its pages):

Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” (John 14:6)

"Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.’’ (Acts 4:12).

Peter’s statement above remains true today, even after many other names have been added to the mix. Only the Name and Person and Redemptive Work of Jesus provides salvation and forgiveness of sins necessary for anyone to get to heaven.

What amazes me is how you see on Larry King Live various ministers, including many evangelicals, giving less-than-straight-forward answers to the question he invariably asks, “Do you think only Christians are going to heaven?” If I were on his show and he asked me that, I would say this: “Well, Larry, it’s like this. There are three ways to get to heaven. One, live a perfect, sinless life, and when you die you’ll go to heaven. Or two, die before you are held accountable for any sins, like aborted babies, etc. Or three, make sure your sins are forgiven before you die. Now, we know most people fit category no. 3, like you, Larry. Now, if you’re serious about asking that question, we can spend the rest of your show talking about how you get your sins forgiven, but I will put it in a nutshell—believe in Jesus Who died for your sins and rose again, paying for your sins in full, or you will end up paying for your own sins for all eternity. The last I heard, there was no one else who died for my sins and your sins, than Jesus. If you don’t accept His payment for them, how do you expect to get into heaven on your own? By being a nice guy or a great interviewer? Good luck!”**
 
I would agree with the above quote and add the following two verses, which may have already been cited in this thread (sorry, I didn’t read all its pages):

Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” (John 14:6)

"Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.’’ (Acts 4:12).

Peter’s statement above remains true today, even after many other names have been added to the mix. Only the Name and Person and Redemptive Work of Jesus provides salvation and forgiveness of sins necessary for anyone to get to heaven.

What amazes me is how you see on Larry King Live various ministers, including many evangelicals, giving less-than-straight-forward answers to the question he invariably asks, “Do you think only Christians are going to heaven?” If I were on his show and he asked me that, I would say this: "Well, Larry, it’s like this. There are three ways to get to heaven. One, live a perfect, sinless life, and when you die you’ll go to heaven.
Well, Mother Mary was perfectly sinless, but she needed to have a good relationship with Jesus, too. So, not even being completely perfect lets you off the hook - you still have to have a relationship with Jesus, even if you’re perfect! 🙂
Or two, die before you are held accountable for any sins, like aborted babies, etc.
Even so, they are conceived in Original Sin, so they, too, have to get into a relationship with Jesus - most likely by means of Baptism of Desire. Again, no by-passing Jesus. Truly, no one comes to the Father except through Him. 🙂
 
I don’t think Abraham went to Hell. Once in Hell, always in Hell. When I was a child, I always pictured those who died before Christ’s death as being in sort of a holding pen, until God decided what to do with them. Chidlish, huh?

As you quoted:
847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:

Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.337

If one believes that those not Catholic go to Hell then I would say they are denying what the Church has stated. We cannot make that final judgement. Only God can mke that final judgement and God is all merciful.🙂 Peace
They slept until the ressurection, after that point, they were given the grace God bestowed to all of mankind, take note when Jesus was taken up into heaven, he wasn’t alone.
 
They slept until the ressurection, after that point, they were given the grace God bestowed to all of mankind, take note when Jesus was taken up into heaven, he wasn’t alone.
Slept? When one is physically dead, the body is dead. Period. And we don’t know where they were until the Resurrection. The Jews believed them to be in the ‘abode’ of the dead, and that was and is open to all sorts of interpretation.
 
It’s easier to simply say slept, they were not writhing in torment, nor were they being punished on any level, just a time out until Christ made his sacrifice, nothing more. Why do people take so much interest in this, it’s nothing emphasised in the word as having huge importance, what matters most is getting those that are living today to follow Christ.
 
They slept until the ressurection, after that point, they were given the grace God bestowed to all of mankind, take note when Jesus was taken up into heaven, he wasn’t alone.
Yes, I had forgotten that. He did have escorts. Peace.
 
It’s easier to simply say slept, they were not writhing in torment, nor were they being punished on any level, just a time out until Christ made his sacrifice, nothing more. Why do people take so much interest in this, it’s nothing emphasised in the word as having huge importance, what matters most is getting those that are living today to follow Christ.
Because some groups actually believe that the soul (and, to some, even the body) ‘sleeps’ until the day of judgment and is not conscious of God until then.
 
I think once you pass, for all practical purposes, linear time ceases to exist for the individual soul, which might help explain it better, so no waiting around for things to happen…
 
I’d like to know how difficult it is to acquire a bible in India. Surely it can’t be that hard, there are also plenty of christian churches to choose from as well. They cannot say they have no chance at exposure to the gospel, it’s everywhere these days.
You are kidding, right? There are probably thousands of small villages in India and other parts of the world that have never seen a bible or heard about Christianity, most probably can’t even read. Yet many probably live out good and peaceful lives and worshiping there idea of who God is.

I can’t believe God is that unjust to condemn those folks to Hell. Sorry, that doesn’t wash with me.
 
But that is what he IS saying to you. If you dont know the faith and are not exposed to it your are NOT held responsible. But if the faith is there for your to learn and you know it and refuse to accept it then you are GETTING IT. If you reject God and refuse to follow him you are not one of his. Its as simple as that. He is not saying if you dont know any better. If you dont know any better than God will have mercy on you its not your fault. Hope that helps you to understand a little better. God Bless.
You and I are in agreement. However, that is not what he was saying. He said no non-Christians will achieve salvation. According to the Church, he is incorrect.
 
Less than three percent of the population in India is Christian. They are continually bombing Catholic churches and murdering Catholic priests, because they are a threat to the caste system, and to the system of oppression against women. It’s difficult to convince a woman that she is merely a talking farm animal when a Catholic priest is offering to baptize her and teach her the Catechism just like a regular human being.
Bombing Churches and murdering priests certainly will diminish their chances at salvation, no argument there.
 
I don’t think Abraham went to Hell. Once in Hell, always in Hell. When I was a child, I always pictured those who died before Christ’s death as being in sort of a holding pen, until God decided what to do with them. Chidlish, huh?

As you quoted:
847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:

Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.337

If one believes that those not Catholic go to Hell then I would say they are denying what the Church has stated. We cannot make that final judgement. Only God can mke that final judgement and God is all merciful.🙂 Peace
Exactly!! You got it! 👍
 
You are kidding, right? There are probably thousands of small villages in India and other parts of the world that have never seen a bible or heard about Christianity, most probably can’t even read. Yet many probably live out good and peaceful lives and worshiping there idea of who God is.

I can’t believe God is that unjust to condemn those folks to Hell. Sorry, that doesn’t wash with me.
I am not talking about those that are obviously out in the boondogs completely cut off from civilation, that gap is actually closing as time moves forward due to technological advances. I gaurantee, 3% of that population found it, this means that it’s not, non existant, the question was valid, honestly, how hard is it to get a bible in that country? From the sounds of it, it seems to be someting outlawed, or no? Now, if it is, do they have internet access, you better believe they do, they have swamped the web design market to extreems, in fact, cut into a side business I used to run making it impossible to make a living off of due to their cheap rates. Now, if that is the case, they can easily look up plenty of online bible’s and resources, so in the end, for many of them, they have no excuse any more.
 
You are kidding, right? There are probably thousands of small villages in India and other parts of the world that have never seen a bible or heard about Christianity, most probably can’t even read. Yet many probably live out good and peaceful lives and worshiping there idea of who God is.

I can’t believe God is that unjust to condemn those folks to Hell. Sorry, that doesn’t wash with me.
God doesn’t condemn them to Hell. What an arrogant viewpoint, and such ignorance of the world. I agree with you, mikew. And it is definitely in line with Church teaching and Vatican II.
 
God doesn’t condemn them to Hell. What an arrogant viewpoint, and such ignorance of the world. I agree with you, mikew. And it is definitely in line with Church teaching and Vatican II.
i agree… & the Church does not teach that people ignorant of Christ go to Hell… It is just easier (etc) to get to Heaven when one is in the Church established by Christ. That is why he died for us. It is why He established the Church. It is why He made the Church the way He made it… & promised to protect it despite its weak human ministers… (St. Matthew 16:18… etc.). He knew how weak we are…
“To whom more is given, more is required” (can’t recall where that is in Bible) so if anything, it is we Catholics all the more who need to be concerned about our salvation…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top