Hello everyone,
I’m in a debate with someone on Twitter that isn’t Catholic about kneeling in front of a statue of our blessed mother, Mary. What proof do we have that says it is okay to kneel in front of a statue? I know that we aren’t praying or worshiping the statue but the person it represents but this particular person always reverts back to worshiping the statue.
Any help or biblical reference would be much appreciated!
God Bless!
Does the person kneel to say his or her prayers? If he does, are there pictures of his ‘dear departed around’? Does he pause in prayer to remember them? Do their faces come before his mind? Does he hear their voice in a remembered lullaby or such, and if he does, do those things which he sees, ‘hears’, etc. help him to think more fully of the person, and thus in his prayer to Christ is he then more ‘aware’ of himself, the departed, and God as well with regard to the relationship of all the above?
Does the person ever bow to another, shake hands, nod his head? All those symbols are signs of respect and many of them came about in conjunction with, or as a substitute for, kneeling. A bow is kind of a ‘short kneel’; shaking hands showed that the people were not going to stab each other with the swords which men customarily wore at their sides for centuries, nodding the head in greeting is an even more abbreviated bow/kneel, used among those who considered themselves ‘equals’.
But even the greatest ‘duke’ or the Prince of Wales will kneel to his sovereign queen/king.
Did the person, if male, go ‘down on his knees’ to propose marriage? He wasn’t worshipping the bride-to-be, was he? It was a posture aiming to show a humble pose on his part as well as an ‘homage’ to the woman he was asking. . .
If female, did she have a ‘bended knee’ proposal and complain it was ‘worship’?
As far as ‘statue’, if Catholics worshipped statues, they would be as up front about it as pagans. Why not? If they thought statue worship was good, they’d say so. Heck, they’re perfectly up front about things like marriage being between one man and one woman. They’re up front about the fact that in the Eucharist they are consuming the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity, of Jesus Christ–something that the average non-Catholic considers to be ‘symbolic’ at best.
So why would there be one facet of Catholic teaching which not every Catholic does, which is totally voluntary, not considered necessary like sacraments. . .which Catholics would lie about?
It doesn’t make
sense.
Plus it is extremely rude (IMHO) for somebody non-Catholic to be aware (and they are aware) of the Catholic teaching on what a statue is, what worship is, that Catholic teaching specifically forbids worship of anyone but God–in the sense of worship that is understood by today’s 20th/21st century definitions of ‘that offered to God as Supreme Lord’–that no Catholic looks upon any statue, whether of Mary or other saints, as BEING God, or during the Mass or prayers saying, "Mary save me’ or “St Peter, you are the body and blood, soul and divinity, of God Himself” etc–and STILL saying, "But you Catholics DO worship statues because you kneel in front of them.
FACE PALM TO INFINITY HERE.
Beyond rude. Beyond unchristian.
If somebody were to tell them that because they are always speaking of the Holy Bible as “God’s word” and they’re always saying, “check the Bible, listen to it, only follow what is in it”, that they must worship the Bible as God, because that’s their focus, and they aren’t saying, "Go to God’ but “Go to the Bible” as if the two were exactly synonymous, they would be upset and think we were being rude.
So why is it we have to accept their explanation, but they don’t have to accept ours?