I think lifeteen has wisely moved away from thier original purpose and moved into the curriculum category. But you should know being a lifeteen operator that there is indeed a liturgical component. And I don’t know how long you have been involved with lifeteen but that component is still around in many parishes. I have attended lifeteen conferences in Arizona at the original parish.
here are some interesting tidbits I would like your (name removed by moderator)ut on.
ewtn.com/vexperts/showmessage.asp?number=330774&Pg=&Pgnu=&recnu=
jimmyakin.com/2004/07/flash_lifeteen_.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dale_Fushek
And in regard to Dale Fushek, Does it give you any pause or is it separate enough for you to not connect the two. Personally, it would give me pause. But I know others whom I respect that have separated the two apart.
If indeed lifeteen were just a curriculum then no correction would have been needed liturgically.
But on the curriculum issue I see a parallel here Pianistclaire,
I homeschool using Seton Homeschool curriculum I love it and it is truly the BEST Catholic education my kids could get. I firmly believe that for my children anything else would be a disservice to them. Does this mean that I think Seton is correct for every child or even every homeschooler? Of course not! But in homeschooling circles curriculum wars abound. Same with youth ministry. Everyone thinks that their program is correct. For everyone. You have even given the impression that lifeteen would be ideal or even adequate for every parish. This is not true. And lifeteen markets itself this way and I think that is a mistake. A blanket program for every situation is unattainable and no amount of rebranding or refocusing by lifeteen will change that. The fact is that Catholic youth ministry is in need of a cleaning. And lifeteen is really the biggest and most well known program. I think a monopoly or dominance indicates a vacuum in the market. And I think teens are starving for authentic food. The person I feel that could really implement this program is Matthew Kelly, whom I personally probably would not get along with and I have criticisms of his books and talks but honestly, he has the business mind and social knowledge to develop a viable teen program. Now I have no idea if Matthew has ever attempted this or would be interested in it but I honestly think he could help give a real alternative to Lifeteen.
For my next YM position should this bear itself out, I am curious to try out ydiciple. Which was not around in my YM days. I know several of the people involved with it and am still learning about it. The philosophy really hits at what rings true to me in the arena of Youth Ministry. Have you had experience with it? I would love to hear your (name removed by moderator)ut as a Youth Minister.
I think it is important that we not look to one source as the end all be all for every parish. I think lifeteen has certain drawbacks to it and I think others do as well. But I think we should not be so blinded by our passion to defend it or destroy it that we refuse to see it’s faults and benefits and realize that two parishes may have two different needs that lifeteen could or could not fill. And a lot depends on the YM too. Lifeteen saved my bacon my first two years. And I am not saying it is only for YM who are not experienced. Some of the best youth ministers I know are using life teen. Also, by skeleton I was not referring to “content” but of the ability to tailor it to your nights. It used to be much more rigid and scripted. I think giving more flexibility was a smart move. By skeleton I mean that they give you the bones and you can fill in the meat.