Is mankind to serve the Church or is the Church to serve Mankind?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eelpis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

eelpis

Guest
Is the there a philosophy of “thisworldliness” in Vatican II, particularly in Gaudium et Spes, where it says that the goal of the Church is to make us more human? Where man is the center rather than Christ?
Where conscience is seen as a divine spark in all of us? Is the Council proposing a new anthropology?
 
Neither.

The Church is the body of the faithful of Christ–and as this body exists to glorify God.
 
Is the there a philosophy of “thisworldliness” in Vatican II, particularly in Gaudium et Spes, where it says that the goal of the Church is to make us more human? Where man is the center rather than Christ?
Where conscience is seen as a divine spark in all of us? Is the Council proposing a new anthropology?
Did not Jesus wash the feet of his apostles at the last supper? Did he come to glorify himself or to bring us salvation? In doing so he glorified the Father, but one would be hard put to declare scourging, a crown of thorns, and a death by crucifixion to be a process of glorification. Jesus came to serve humanity. He taught us to emulate him.

To be truly human is to be like Adam and Eve before the fall; we never quite get there but the striving is important. My conclusion is that the Church is there to serve mankind; to teach us and aid us in giving God the glory he deserves. The Church is not God.
 
Is the there a philosophy of “thisworldliness” in Vatican II, particularly in Gaudium et Spes, where it says that the goal of the Church is to make us more human? Where man is the center rather than Christ?
Where conscience is seen as a divine spark in all of us? Is the Council proposing a new anthropology?
Please point out the paragraph(s) wherein Gaudium et Spes says that man is the center rather than Christ.
 
Is the there a philosophy of “thisworldliness” in Vatican II, particularly in Gaudium et Spes, where it says that the goal of the Church is to make us more human? Where man is the center rather than Christ?
I don’t think GS says that. Let’s look at the two instances of this phrase that I can find, in their contexts:

“That the earthly and the heavenly city penetrate each other is a fact accessible to faith alone; it remains a mystery of human history, which sin will keep in great disarray until the splendor of God’s sons is fully revealed. Pursuing the saving purpose which is proper to her, the Church does not only communicate divine life to men but in some way casts the reflected light of that life over the entire earth, most of all by its healing and elevating impact on the dignity of the person, by the way in which it strengthens the seams of human society and imbues the everyday activity of men with a deeper meaning and importance. Thus through her individual matters and her whole community, the Church believes she can contribute greatly toward making the family of man and its history more human.” (GS 40)

In other words, a byproduct of the salvation of souls (the communication of the divine life to men) is a community of men who are more human because they are “more divine” as well: what I mean is, because they are more conformed to Christ (in whom humanity and divinity co-existed in their totality), Christians are more complete as humans. Thus, the Church contributes to the process of making mankind more human.

Christians, on pilgrimage toward the heavenly city, should seek and think of these things which are above. This duty in no way decreases, rather it increases, the importance of their obligation to work with all men in the building of a more human world.” (GS 57)

Again, the members of the Church have an obligation to “[build a] more human world”; this does not mean “human” to the exclusion of “Christian”.
 
In answer to the thread title, the latter must be true. Just like the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the service, the greatness of the Chuch call Her to the role of a servant, for that is where greatness lies.
 
Again, the members of the Church have an obligation to “[build a] more human world”; this does not mean “human” to the exclusion of “Christian”.
There’s the rub, as Shakespeare would say.

Secular Humanism attempts to be responsible moral Humans without reliance on Divine Providence and intervention. It has creeped into Catholic culture as a hedge against the remote possibility that God will not intervene in time as our world population grows to unmanagable levels. We are on a lifeboat called earth with a certain number of people growing at a certain rate with limited boat capacity and limited resources to feed the hungry. Secular Humanism, which is logical, does not allow for God’s Divine Providence. Secular Humanism is today’s “strange god” that has infiltrated the Catholic Church and offers libations to Ishtar, the goddess of fertility, and offers holocausts via immolation by fire of our owns sons and daughters, rendering our temple worship unacceptable to God.

Where am I coming from? The Pharisees and Scribes could cite chapter and verse of any Old Testament like any good “solo scriptura” Protestant today. They knew what Jesus was alluding to when He overturned the money-changers tables with the words:

“My house shall be called a house of prayer for all peoples.
<refer to Isaiah 56,7>
But you have made it a DEN OF THIEVES.
<refer to Jeremiah 7,11>”

Chapter 56 of Isaiah is all about how all are welcome in the house of the Lord. How it is to be “inclusive” in modern parlance.

Chapter 7 of Jeremiah uses the term “den of thieves” and is all about when a temple of worship is not acceptable to the Lord and is liable to severe punishment (as at Shiloh). It is about the deceit of the faithful(?) who think that they will be saved because they put their faith in “This is a temple of the Lord! A temple of the Lord! A temple of the Lord!”, but their behavior as good as says “We are safe. We can do these abominations again.”.

Chapter 7 of Jeremiah goes on to cite some SPECIFIC ABUSES of temple worship, including:
(1) worship of Ishtar, goddess of fertility - a competing religion and “strange god”
(2) holocaust of their own sons and daughters by means of immolation by fire.

These abuses pertain to us today via:
(1) Secular humanism and our current sex obsessive society.
(2) Abortion - the immolation of our own sons and daughter.
 
Maybe this is too simple, but the first thing I thought of is this: the catechism says the purpose of life is to “know God, to love God and to serve God.” To me that would say that mankind would serve the Church.
 
Maybe this is too simple, but the first thing I thought of is this: the catechism says the purpose of life is to “know God, to love God and to serve God.” To me that would say that mankind would serve the Church.
You beat me to it.👍
 
Is the there a philosophy of “thisworldliness” in Vatican II, particularly in Gaudium et Spes, where it says that the goal of the Church is to make us more human? Where man is the center rather than Christ?
Where conscience is seen as a divine spark in all of us? Is the Council proposing a new anthropology?
Excellent question. Which comes first – devotion to Christ or devotion to the Church? I don’t think this question can be answered definitively. Each of us answers it in his own way. Some Catholics put the Church first, while others, Christian witness. Personally, I try to maintain a balance. I pursue discipleship, through Catholic teachings, because that’s the primary context in which I view Christ and the journey of His people. Metaphorically, Christ is my life. The Church is my conduit to Him. 👍
 
Hy
I dont think man should serve the Church at all. I personally belive in God and his son Jesus, not in a church which is just a buliding bulit by man. Nothing from man is worthy to serve.
Church is for people to pray together if they want. If I pray at home I am not any less than one who prays in a church every day.
I dont like the idea of a fancy church dripping in gold, it is very nice for the eyes and yes I like to look at it myself, but God is far from gold and fancy cloaks. I dont think God wants us to build expensive churches and say this is his house. Gos wants us to love him and each other everywhere in any circumstances, may it be a fancy church or a dirty stable. The only important thing is GOD and HUMAN, nothing else matters.
 
Hy
I dont think man should serve the Church at all. I personally belive in God and his son Jesus, not in a church which is just a buliding bulit by man. Nothing from man is worthy to serve.
Church is for people to pray together if they want. If I pray at home I am not any less than one who prays in a church every day.
I dont like the idea of a fancy church dripping in gold, it is very nice for the eyes and yes I like to look at it myself, but God is far from gold and fancy cloaks. I dont think God wants us to build expensive churches and say this is his house. Gos wants us to love him and each other everywhere in any circumstances, may it be a fancy church or a dirty stable. The only important thing is GOD and HUMAN, nothing else matters.
Cool. But don’t forget Christ’s commandment that we meet in His name, and to consume His flesh and blood. We can’t do that if we stay home.
 
Cool. But don’t forget Christ’s commandment that we meet in His name, and to consume His flesh and blood. We can’t do that if we stay home.
Thats ok, but we can meet in His name out of church as friends in someones home as Jesus did. We can talk about the love of God as we do it right now, i think this is even better since we share our opinions and our experiences. I dont think drinking wine is going to save me either. I know lots of people who drink a lot of wine and not for the sake of God. :-))
I am not saying not to go to church, all I am saying is to know the difference between God and a house. I live in a place where some people go to church to gossip, and those ones from the first row I hear them cursing the day after.
Going to church to serve it or serve the priest or the pope himself is not right they are not eny better than you are. You can serve God from a shed and you can hate him from the Vatican if you like.
I love GOD in or out of a church and I dont need anything to tell me how to do so. You have to have your own realitonship with Him and he`ll let you know what to do.
 
I dont think man should serve the Church at all. I personally belive in God and his son Jesus, not in a church which is just a buliding bulit by man.
I don’t think we’re talking about serving a church (meaning “a building”, we’re talking about serving the Church (meaning “the Mystical Body of Christ, the Church founded by Jesus Christ”).
Church is for people to pray together if they want. If I pray at home I am not any less than one who prays in a church every day.
Assuming you’re talking about the word “church” in the building sense, churches are not just for us to pray in “if [we] want”. Our churches are also where the Body of Christ assembles for divine worship of God, on every Sunday and holy-day.
I dont like the idea of a fancy church dripping in gold, it is very nice for the eyes and yes I like to look at it myself, but God is far from gold and fancy cloaks.
Scripture does not agree with you. Yes, Jesus was born into humble estate, but he was visited by Magi bearing gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh. The Book of Revelation shows that Jesus is clothed in fine garments, worthy of all wealth and power and honor and glory. Just because God is with the lowly does not mean He is “far from gold”.
God wants us to love him and each other everywhere in any circumstances, may it be a fancy church or a dirty stable.
Building a beautiful church in which to worship God does not preclude us from loving God in every place in which we encounter Him (such as the poor of the world).
 
I dont say not to go to church, I am saying that one does not need to go to church to worship God, or wear golden crosses to prove they beleive, or put expensive paintings on the wall of jesus so you see if you enter there houses that they beleive. I want to feel God in my heart nowhere else. I say what is in the bible: dont pray outloud, pray for yourself, dont be generous and shout it, give away your money but dont tell anyone, and dont worry about your clothes because God gives you what you need!!! I dont need the church, not the building nor the institution that changes the list of sins to fit to new world.
It is a bit like marriage, I beleive in the institution of marriage but what it became nowadays is just something I dont want to be a part of. It is all about money now. How much you spend on it, how much you have before you married is the main reason people get married today. I am not married but I love my partner and my daughter very much, and I dont need an expensive wedding to let her know!! For me it is a bit ridicolous.
I dont need to stand in front of a sculpture of Jesus made out of gold or wood to let him know I love him and I want him to lead every step of mine.
(( I dont want people to spend money on buliding new churches when money is more needed elsewhere. You know I lived in Edinburgh, Scotland and I saw chruches (not 1 not 2) turned into a PUB or a GYM. This is disgrace against God and Jesus. People dont respect anything anymore.))
I want Him to know every minute of my life -not just on Sundays- that I love him.
I also dont beleive that just because Jesuss visitors took all that wealth for him means that thats what he wanted. I think this is our way of expressing that He is important. Like Mary Magdalene who had nothing but still bought expensive oil to pour it onto His body. Its just a symbol of our love, like a diamond engagement ring. To show that youd give away everything to prove you are serious. Just like Jesus asked the wealthy to give away everything he had to prove he is devoted.
I also read revelations, but I think God would be the same sitting on a wooden throne. All that wealth around him in my opinion is a symbol of His purity. I dont expect Him giving away gold for those who are worthy when the day comes.
The point is that everything is changing, we are changing, the church is changing both the building both the institution, but God was and is the same and for me that is the reason why I love Him so much. He will be the same forever.
I think if all of us would go church as much as we go to places we are not supposed to the world would be a better place.
 
I dont need the church, not the building nor the institution that changes the list of sins to fit to new world.
I think you are over-reacting. EVERY human needs the Church. The Church is the Body of Christ. There is no salvation apart from Christ nor his Body.
It is a bit like marriage, I beleive in the institution of marriage but what it became nowadays is just something I dont want to be a part of. … I am not married but I love my partner and my daughter very much, and I dont need an expensive wedding to let her know!
No one is asking you to have an expensive marriage. But you said you do believe in the institution of marriage, so why aren’t you married? I do not mean to judge, but are you admitting you are living in a sexual relationship outside of marriage? That is something you should correct. (I have things I need to correct, too!)
The point is that everything is changing, we are changing, the church is changing both the building both the institution, but God was and is the same and for me that is the reason why I love Him so much. He will be the same forever.
Some people are trying to change the Church, but they will ultimately fail. God protects His Church.
I think if all of us would go church as much as we go to places we are not supposed to the world would be a better place.
Wait, so which is it? Should we, or shouldn’t we, go to church? I’m confused.
 
I dont think you get what I am saying, sorry probably is the way I am expressing myself. Correct me if I am wrong but I never sad I am against going to church, or telling you to go or not. All I am saying is that I think you dont NEED to go to church to worship God. Going to chruch is not a bad thing, but I dont think that without it I am lost. I dont go to church and I am not missing anything I beleive.
I dont like the fact that the church is mixing with politics all the time. I dont want to hear the priest telling me his opinion about current politics or elections or sometimes they even try to convince me that one politician is different than the other.
Anyway I dont want to talk about politics!
The reason is I am not married is simple, here in the UK you have to pay for marriage license and to the registra as well and for paperwork etc. It costs a few thousand the simplest one. Since my daughter was born a few weeks ago my partner is not working. At this moment other things are more important than getting married. We want to get married of course, and we are going to as soon as we get a bit stornger financially.
I am sharing too much now!
Long story short, I am not over-reacting, this is simply my personal opinion. I dont feel I need anything else apart from God and Jesus. I feel God is close to me and I hope it will never change and I can correct every error of mine.
Everyone else; go to church or do whatever takes you closer to God.
 
Correct me if I am wrong but I never sad I am against going to church, or telling you to go or not. All I am saying is that I think you dont NEED to go to church to worship God.
Okay, you’re wrong. Yes, you do “NEED to go to church to worship God.” God commands it, and he commands us to do only what is needful. Jesus Christ asked us to only one thing for him, and that was to take part in the Eucharist “in remembrance” of him. The only place you can do that is at Mass.

You can worship God anywhere, and indeed one should worship God everywhere. But to say that this fact precludes the very real necessity of the Mass is to present a false dilemma.

Of course, the topic of this thread is also a false dilemma. “Is mankind to serve the Church or is the Church to serve Mankind?” The answer is, “Yes.”

– Mark L. Chance.
 
Thats ok, but we can meet in His name out of church as friends in someones home as Jesus did. We can talk about the love of God as we do it right now, i think this is even better since we share our opinions and our experiences. I dont think drinking wine is going to save me either. I know lots of people who drink a lot of wine and not for the sake of God. :-))
I am not saying not to go to church, all I am saying is to know the difference between God and a house. I live in a place where some people go to church to gossip, and those ones from the first row I hear them cursing the day after.
Going to church to serve it or serve the priest or the pope himself is not right they are not eny better than you are. You can serve God from a shed and you can hate him from the Vatican if you like.
I love GOD in or out of a church and I dont need anything to tell me how to do so. You have to have your own realitonship with Him and he`ll let you know what to do.
I agree on the personal relationship point. However, again, Christianity has to be much more than that – a personal relationship. Don’t forget salvation history and the colossal importance of organized Christianity in human time. Without them, there wouldn’t be any Christianity. We must make the public testament regularly, together, for many, many reasons, one of which is the maintenance of our collective self-identity and way of life. I’m no saint. I frequently miss Mass out of pure sloth. Still, I believe in it. Mass has not failed me. I have failed the Lord by not faithfully attending Mass. I’m going this Sunday, barring WWIII in Texas. It’s going to happen, no matter what.🙂
 
All I am saying is that I think you dont NEED to go to church to worship God. Going to chruch is not a bad thing, but I dont think that without it I am lost. I dont go to church and I am not missing anything I beleive.
That’s not very Catholic. 😦 You are missing something by not going to Church. You are neglecting your duty, as a member of the Body of Christ, to worship God together with His Church on Sunday, the day which commemorates the Resurrection. You are avoiding Holy Communion, the Most Blessed Sacrament where Jesus Christ comes to each of us, under the appearance of bread and wine; his Real Presence. You are missing the other sacraments, especially Reconciliation (or Confession or Penance, whatever you prefer to call it). You are probably also neglecting to have your child baptized, which is compounded by the fact that you don’t appear to be a practicing Catholic.
I dont want to hear the priest telling me his opinion about current politics or elections or sometimes they even try to convince me that one politician is different than the other.
Some politicians are Catholic. As such, they should be Catholic even when they are “on the job”. Case closed.
I dont feel I need anything else apart from God and Jesus. I feel God is close to me and I hope it will never change and I can correct every error of mine.
It is nonsensical to separate God and His Church. Jesus is the head of the Church; the Church is the body. The Church is his bride!
Everyone else; go to church or do whatever takes you closer to God.
That sort of relativism and indifferentism leads to the thousands of sects of Christianity you find today. Instead of doing what suits us, why don’t we try to learn what suits God?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top