Is Marriage without Love Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahoyhoy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
no…not as love is defined in the Bible (Love is gentle etc).

in any case, here is an article: the case for settling for mr. good enough theatlantic.com/doc/200803/single-marry

just make sure you guys are committed to living for each other under God. Be cautious, and trust yourself. There’s no need to worry. Also, RevRunWisdom Ladies:: dont worry so much about finding the right man… just be happy ur the right woman… dats da key^
I read that article when it first came out in 2008, and it scared me. I’m 28, a single woman, and I’m not getting any better looking. Eeep. I know I’m not called to be a nun or a single person (being celibate is NOT POSSIBLE for me), so what is the hold up? 🙂
 
Based on what I’ve learned over the past couple years of my life (and especially the past few months) marriage without love is impossible…because if you truly commit yourself to the marital commitment, love will creep in where you thought all hope was lost.

I was in a “loveless” marriage. Even with the small steps I’ve been making lately, I feel love creeping into my heart. Woohoo! I know I asked a question similar to yours two years ago when I was feeling hopeless, and I wish I knew then what I know now. 🙂
 
I do not think that getting married without feeling quite romantic is advisable. It certainly isn’t fair to the spouse not to be loved in a romantic way.
I’d be devastated if my husband did not really love me passionately.
 
I feel I am in a one-sided-love marriage – I love him, have for all 23 years of our marriage, but never felt/was loved by him – he only does his duty, works hard, does necessary chores, etc, but never really involves himself in me or our 6 children, doesn’t want to ‘know’ us or be ‘known’, doesn’t ‘talk’ to us, doesn’t help discipline or deal with the emotions or worries or dreams of any of us, and it is very lonely. We are considering annulment. He is fine w/o love – I am not. Wait for it – it isn’t fair.
 
Last question, and then I’m out of here. 😉

Is it possible to marry someone without love? I’m using “love” here in its romantic context. Obviously I can love someone in the way that many people would label “as friends,” but I’ve never really experienced that head-over-heels, I’d-do-anything-for-you kind of feelings. Generally I’m not too emotional, and admittedly I have a tendency to be indifferent or too careful. I don’t get sexually attracted to anyone. I may be physically attracted to anyone, but once his personality or attitude (or his interaction with me) is revealed to be not something of my preference, I’d quickly lose interest.
I must ask you this question: do you know what love is?

You posted a previous message stating “love is a choice, not a feeling.” This is fundamentally true. You received feedback that love is indeed a choice - a choice to do what is best for another person. This means doing things that perhaps you do not want to do - even things that require great sacrifice. Ultimately, what is best for that person is to help them attain salvation.

Marriage requires tremendous sacrifice, if it is to work. If you are not willing to make these sacrifices for another person - specifically, your spouse - then do not marry.

So if you do not love that person - really love them - then do not marry. You will not be capable of the tremendous sacrifices that the marriage bond entails.

Can you help that person through injury or illness? Financial problems? Professional setbacks? Legal issues? Moral and spiritual difficulties? Sexual shortcomings? The demands of parenthood? And all the while, be a faithful and devoted companion, and be 100% committed to fidelity in marriage?

If you don’t really love someone (read that: sacrifice for someone), then please, do not get married. Chose abstinence instead.
 
My impression is that ahoyhoy just hasn’t had anyone who has been able to “push her buttons”, if you get my drift. She seems to have not met a potential spouse who can be persitent enough to overcome her fears/antipathy/vows of chastity, or whatever it is that makes her not interested. I was taught from a young age that one of the very important ‘manly qualities’ was persistance. So, when the right man comes along, he just might have to be a little more persistant and insistant!
Gee, one of my aunties was absolutely hounded by the man who eventually married her. She couldn’t stand him for a long time. From what I have been told, the ‘courtship’ lasted around three years! Eventually something “clicked” and they had over thirty years of wonderfully happy marriage. Bloody persistant man he was too…😃
 
Two things, for whatever they’re worth.

My great grandfather came to this country from Ireland with his wife. While here, his wife died. They had children. He wrote to his wife’s unmarried sister in Ireland, in whom he had no previous interest and who, by the telling of it, had none in him. He asked if she would be willing to come to America, marry him and help him take care of the children. Her rather unromantic letter of response was brief: “I’m willing” was her response.

He paid for her trip over, they married and, by all accounts, it was a very successful marriage.

Second thing. When my wife and I first met, at an election watch party, she did not like me at all. She thought I was an arrogant womanizer. At that time in my life, she was correct in her assessment. Indeed, I was “putting my best moves” on various women at the party. I really wasn’t too bad at it either back then. She then undertook to undercut my “terrific lines” in front of other women by making caustic comments as the opportunity presented. This was cramping my style, so I took her aside and asked for a truce. She agreed she would refrain from adverse comment if I would just be myself in front of those other women.

On impulse, but on something more than that (not sure what) I then asked her since I was obliged to be honest in her presence, would she be my confidante? She agreed, on condition that I would thenceforth be her confidant as well, should she ever feel the need for it. It was really just a mutual commitment to honesty and a sort of utilitarian availability for talk, initially. Because of that commitment, I did frequently seek out her confidence after that night, as she did with me. It really was remarkable how that developed into love. After that commitment, I did date others for a time, as did she, but I really never again was interested in the company of any other woman. Yes, she truly was attractive in many ways, and I was not unaware of that. But the truth is that the commitment (to honesty and availability, at least) predeceded romantic interest, as most understand that.
 
Last question, and then I’m out of here. 😉

Is it possible to marry someone without love? I’m using “love” here in its romantic context. Obviously I can love someone in the way that many people would label “as friends,” but I’ve never really experienced that head-over-heels, I’d-do-anything-for-you kind of feelings. Generally I’m not too emotional, and admittedly I have a tendency to be indifferent or too careful. I don’t get sexually attracted to anyone. I may be physically attracted to anyone, but once his personality or attitude (or his interaction with me) is revealed to be not something of my preference, I’d quickly lose interest.

Earlier I made the “Love Isn’t a Feeling, It’s a Decision” thread. Part of the reason I asked was that I felt like I could definitely *decide *do love someone and stick to it regardless of how I feel about that person. This may not how many of you may interpret that phrase, but this is how I saw (see?) it. Would this be a wise method to get married, though? As someone who was raised in a large family, I’ve always wanted to raise a large family of my own and the only way to achieve this is by first finding a husband. I imagine most men who are halfway decent, though, would want true love to be an important ingredient of their marriage.

(name removed by moderator)ut?
Marry someone who has no romantic love the way you do and be honest about it. That would work best. Or seek till you find someone you DO love.

I’m sure you also can marry a nice homosexual in denial and who will be happy with not having to romance or sex outside making kids, that might work too.
 
I’m sure you also can marry a nice homosexual in denial and who will be happy with not having to romance or sex outside making kids, that might work too.
I have my best friend who is a gay Catholic man, and we have seriously talked about this (being alone does that to people). That way we would be accepted in the church. And I would have a built-in stylist, chef, personal trainer, and someone to sing show tunes with. Hey! That’s an idea. Lol. Not many of my friends who are married have sex or romance anyway. 🙂
Too bad I’m moving out-of-state. 😦
 
My impression is that ahoyhoy just hasn’t had anyone who has been able to “push her buttons”, if you get my drift. She seems to have not met a potential spouse who can be persitent enough to overcome her fears/antipathy/vows of chastity, or whatever it is that makes her not interested. I was taught from a young age that one of the very important ‘manly qualities’ was persistance. So, when the right man comes along, he just might have to be a little more persistant and insistant!
Gee, one of my aunties was absolutely hounded by the man who eventually married her. She couldn’t stand him for a long time. From what I have been told, the ‘courtship’ lasted around three years! Eventually something “clicked” and they had over thirty years of wonderfully happy marriage. Bloody persistant man he was too…😃
Agreed, although I’d be cautious with appreciating persistence alone and I’d warn anyone against overdoing the reward aspect of a woman’s yes to marriage proposal.
 
Marry someone who has no romantic love the way you do and be honest about it. That would work best. Or seek till you find someone you DO love.
I agree. Something like that should be mutual or at least the other party should know where he stands.
I’m sure you also can marry a nice homosexual in denial and who will be happy with not having to romance or sex outside making kids, that might work too.
I doubt that would withstand the criteria of canon 1095, i.e. psychic ability to undertake and perform essential obligations of marriage.
 
Is it possible to marry someone without romantic love? Yes. In fact, the majority of marriages in the world and throughout the course of history have taken place without romantic love. The Church doesn’t demand that we have romantic feelings for our spouse. And truthfully, we probably won’t have romantic feelings for our spouse every moment of our lives.

In modern day America, most people think that the purpose of marriage is “personal fulfillment and happiness,” which is NOT the purpose of marriage according to the Church. Happiness and personal fulfillment are the byproducts of other MORE important things.

Is it ADVISABLE to marry someone without romantic feelings? I don’t know. I know personally, as a single person who would like to be married, I would like to have those feelings for my spouse. Would I marry someone without those feelings? Maybe. I don’t know.
 
Well, now that you say, we’d probably be able to amass at least a couple of different definitions of “romantic” in this thread alone, ranging from some people seeing it as pralines and roses, wishy washy stuff, to basically something along the lines of “erotic love” (from eros, not from XXX). As you say, many people seem to go without any specific feelings really. I’d say many people do fine without counting the stars and strolling down the lovers’ lane. I’d say dealing away with courtly love is generally beneficial (see particularly “Andalusian and Islamic influence” and later “Stages…”), dealing away with $2 explicit novel style is also and dealing away with any $2 novel outlook generally improves one’s hold on reality and that’s very important from the point of view of being able to form a mature relationship. 😛 Not saying any $2 book is automatically bad or anything like that, but you know what I mean. 😉 Life is life, but, “oh no, we didn’t go stargazing this particular night!” is not a healthy approach to a relationship supposed to lead to marriage. 😛 On the other hand, I do find it rather sad how some would forego all the mutual affection, even if it is not strictly essential. Still, a too romanticised outlook is prone to putting certain man-made and less important things ahead of a sacramental marriage.
 
Last question, and then I’m out of here. 😉

Is it possible to marry someone without love? I’m using “love” here in its romantic context. Obviously I can love someone in the way that many people would label “as friends,” but I’ve never really experienced that head-over-heels, I’d-do-anything-for-you kind of feelings. Generally I’m not too emotional, and admittedly I have a tendency to be indifferent or too careful. I don’t get sexually attracted to anyone. I may be physically attracted to anyone, but once his personality or attitude (or his interaction with me) is revealed to be not something of my preference, I’d quickly lose interest.

Earlier I made the “Love Isn’t a Feeling, It’s a Decision” thread. Part of the reason I asked was that I felt like I could definitely *decide *do love someone and stick to it regardless of how I feel about that person. This may not how many of you may interpret that phrase, but this is how I saw (see?) it. Would this be a wise method to get married, though? As someone who was raised in a large family, I’ve always wanted to raise a large family of my own and the only way to achieve this is by first finding a husband. I imagine most men who are halfway decent, though, would want true love to be an important ingredient of their marriage.

(name removed by moderator)ut?
Read C.S. Lewis’ book “The Four Loves”, particularly the chapters entitled “Eros” & “Charity” respectively. That gave me some insight on this matter & IMO was a pretty good answer.

That romantic feeling is something that helps us act charitably (lovingly) towards our Beloved. I guess its technically not needed, but I would find it very hard to love someone without some romantic feelings… on the other hand perhaps that is a blessing? ( In the sense that since we dont “feel” in love we have to depend on God to help us love our Beloved and thus will strengthen our relationship with God also). The most important thing really is that you actually Love (Love as in charity) your spouse; that romantic feeling is an extra, a nice feeling indeed but still just a feeling. To make that feeling the basis of your whole marriage would 1)be Idolatry and 2)destroy your marriage because you would only love your spouse when you felt in love with them (which in real life doesnt happen everyday of a marriage)

Of course Ive always wondered as to whether or not loving your spouse does result in having romantic feelings as an effect. But then again I wouldnt know not being married myself… I guess you’ll just have to find out 😉

Thats what I think, perhaps Im wrong, perhaps Ive annoyed some married people who may object to what Ive said (How would you know if you didnt need that feelin’ you aint got a woman) so perhaps you should just find out and see 😉

Peace,
Zachary
 
Love means something different to everyone. This is an interesting thread but I would want to know that the person I’m with will be there when times get rough…becaue they will at some point. To me that is the utlimate love. Until I find a guy that’s willing to fight through life with me I’ll remain single.
 
Love means something different to everyone. This is an interesting thread but I would want to know that the person I’m with will be there when times get rough…becaue they will at some point. To me that is the utlimate love. Until I find a guy that’s willing to fight through life with me I’ll remain single.
Excellent. Not the only way to think about it, but certainly a crucial criterion.
 
Yes it is possible, most of our ancestors came from pre aranged mariages, not that they were great, it is what is in current times called, “settling,” which carries negative connotations. Sometimes you can fall in love after the marriage, and just like stated in other threads on this topic, this love may never fill the need for eros love, but rather you can fill the need for love in the agape-type sense because it is on a spiritual base with God and tending to responsibility, obligation, commitment, and family, but you need someone who is just as faith filled and head strong, which our society keeps lacking.
 
Obedience to the requirements of the marital bond and the fruit of it’s consummation is evidence of love. Even if natural affection is missing.
 
When I read through the list of “non-love” criteria at the top of this thread, I expect that I couldn’t not love any man who fulfilled all those 🙂 When I think of my two or three closest male friends, I have no sexual aveto them, but I love them deeply, and I have no doubt that I could be married to them or someone very like them, because of common interests, common faith, how much I enjoy spending time with them, etc.

I think half our problem, at least in the USA, is that we have lost the ability to have opposite-sex friendships without “benefits” or suspicions thereof. If a girl wants to be closer to a guy, the only way we go about it is to date.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top