Is Mary the "coredemptrix"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2nd_Adam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
2

2nd_Adam

Guest
IS MARY THE “COREDEMPTRIX”?

What does Coredemptrix Mean?

Jesus, the New Adam, is the one Savior and Redeemer of all humankind. By His Incarnation, Death and Resurrection, He redeems us from the sin of the first Adam. Mary, the New Eve, plays a lesser, dependent, subordinate role in the redemption of the world, by virtue of her relation to Christ and her cooperation in His life’s mission. So she is sometimes called the Coredemptrix, which means “Woman with the Redeemer” (not “co-redeemer”; see below).

Though many Catholics believe in the legitimacy of this title, it has not been defined as an article of faith, and probably will not be in the forseeable future. Although the concept behind the title is theologically sound, **Catholics are not required to accept the title “Coredemptrix”. **

How This Teaching Exalts Christ

Mary cannot and does not redeem us by herself. She only plays a lesser, non-essential role in the redemptive work of Christ. The Coredemptrix concept re-emphasizes the fact that Jesus is the Redeemer, for if He weren’t then Mary could not be the Coredemptrix.

Biblical Basis

The following are verses commonly cited by proponents of the Coredemptrix concept as biblical support. **Keep in mind that the Church has not yet defined this teaching. **

In Genesis 3:15, God prophesied that the Mother of the Messiah would be at emnity with the devil: “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise they head, and thou shalt bruise his heel”. Mary is forever on the same side as her redeeming Seed in the struggle against evil, sin and death.

Isaiah prophetically called the Messiah the “servant of the Lord”. At the Annunciation, Mary called herself the “haidmaid of the Lord”: “Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word” (Luke 1:38). “Handmaid” is the feminine equivalent of servant. If the Messiah is the Lord’s suffering Servant, then His Mother stands with Him as the Lord’s faithful Handmaid, with a subordinate role to play in the Redemption of mankind.

As we saw in the first article, the Angel’s annunciation to Mary (Luke 1:26-38) reverses the temptation of the first Eve. As Eve’s disobedience indirectly brought about the Fall, so Mary’s obedience indirectly brought about the Redemption. Though it was actually Adam’s sin which caused the Fall (Romans 5:12; I Corinthians 15:22), Eve could be considered the “Copeccatrix”: the woman with Adam the sinner. Similarly, Mary is the “Coredemptrix”: the woman with Christ the Redeemer!

The aged prophet Simeon fortells both the rejection of Christ and the sufferings of His Mother: “And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against; (Yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed” (Luke 2:34-35).

This was fulfilled at Calvary: “Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene” (John 19:25). Mary loved Jesus and must have suffered greatly at seeing Him so torn and humiliated. She prayerfully united her loving sufferings to those of her Son.

St. Paul tells us we can make up what is lacking in the sufferings of Jesus: “Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church” (Col 1:24). In some mysterious manner, Mary did this. Not that Jesus’ suffering was lacking in its salvific power, but in the application of salvation to each of us. More on this below.

home.earthlink.net/~mysticalrose/marian14.html

Let’s discuss and debate this title for Mary. It appears Catholics are divided over Mary the coredemptrix.
 
It is only the term “co-redemptrix” that causes some - not all - Catholics to be divided. Just as it is only terms that divide many Christians.
 
Dear 2nd Adam:

You, yourself, have made the strongest argument for Mary as Co-redemptrix yet.

"St. Paul tells us we can make up what is lacking in the sufferings of Jesus: “Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I complete what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church” (Col 1:24).
"As you said, WE ALL can make up what is lacking in the sufferings of Jesus.this is YOUR quote, not mine~

Paul is saying here, that because of his sufferings, because of the beatings he is getting(and still preaches the gospel) he is shoring up the faith of his fellow Christians. Paul is a co-redeemer…Mary is a woman so she is a co-redemtrix. A Female co-redeemer. She is the Co-redeemer because she contributed to the Mission of Christ ( in a very special way). She bore Truth itself in her womb. That is the ultimate witnessing to truth.

If WE and Paul can “make up what is lacking in Christ Jesus”, then why can’t Mary? She bore him and followed him from his birth all the way to the FOOT OF the cross. The other disciples were watching from afar…she was right there…her courage to stand at the foot of the cross had to “shore up” the faith of the other Christians that were there. We are all called to follow Christ to the foot of the Cross. We are all called to be co-redeemers with Christ(NOT instead of Christ). Our actions should shore up the faith of our fellow Christians.
The name Co-Redemtrix does not belong to Mary alone. Christ is our True redeemer…but he left us to carry on the mission. We should all be striving to be co-redeemers WITH Christ.
As for confusion among Catholics on this topic… this is one Title of Mary that is often misunderstood.
CC
 
I am not sure what all is implied by the term and I have not done much (if any) study into it so at this point in time I do not affirm the belief. I am, however, open to a Catholic brother or sister explaining it to me. Since converting to Catholicism I have found a great deal of “truths” that I once held which I realized were fallacies. I am always open to finding more. 👍

God bless
 
If WE and Paul can “make up what is lacking in Christ Jesus”, then why can’t Mary? She bore him and followed him from his birth all the way to the FOOT OF the cross. The other disciples were watching from afar…she was right there…her courage to stand at the foot of the cross had to “shore up” the faith of the other Christians that were there. We are all called to follow Christ to the foot of the Cross. We are all called to be co-redeemers with Christ(NOT instead of Christ).
Very well said! 🙂
 
How come the catholic church gave Mary this title before it defined its teaching?

The whole concept smacks of the ancient mother/child cult and distracts from God’s Glory due only to Him.
 
The article did not make it sound any better.

Why on earth did my church start all this stuff?

Why could we not keep it simple?

between the Lord’s Prayer, Mass, Nicene Creed, Scripture read literally from genesis to revelation, the priestly order and the Eucharist we did not need anything else.

especially a queen, because we have The King Who shall return.
 
How come the catholic church gave Mary this title before it defined its teaching?

The whole concept smacks of the ancient mother/child cult and distracts from God’s Glory due only to Him.
Same thing was done with the Immaculate Conception and Mother of God.

Anyone in doubt on the question should read Mother of the Savior and Our Interior Life by Garrigou-Lagrange, O.P. Brilliant defense of Co-redemptrix, a term that has been used by several Popes and countless theologians and even more saints (Maximilian Kolbe, Padre Pio, Gemma Galgani, Mother Teresa, etc., etc.).

Basically the doctrine, which all Catholics must believe, is that Mary participated in a unique and unrepeatable way in the salvific offering of Christ, in his one redemption. She offered the Victim as Mother, and thus becomes mother of all the redeemed.
 
It is only the term “co-redemptrix” that causes some - not all - Catholics to be divided. Just as it is only terms that divide many Christians.
That’s very insightful. I think some things that divide us between Catholics and Protestants are terms too.
 
Dear 2nd Adam:
You, yourself, have made the strongest argument for Mary as Co-redemptrix yet.
Just for clarity, my post is a cut and paste with the source being a Catholic site (see link on OP). Actually, the article is actually pretty good. The name of coredemtrix is what is upseting to many Protestants. However, when you try to understand what it means, then it’s not that bad.
 
I am not sure what all is implied by the term and I have not done much (if any) study into it so at this point in time I do not affirm the belief. I am, however, open to a Catholic brother or sister explaining it to me. Since converting to Catholicism I have found a great deal of “truths” that I once held which I realized were fallacies. I am always open to finding more. 👍

God bless
I think we should be open to listening to all Christians too see what they really mean. I know it’s much easier to listen to those who are in the same Christian community. The church is truly universal, and we should see it that way.
 
How come the catholic church gave Mary this title before it defined its teaching?

The whole concept smacks of the ancient mother/child cult and distracts from God’s Glory due only to Him.
Thanks for showing the difficulty of this issue, even within Catholic Christians. Maybe you can understand why Protestant Christians have even a greater difficulty to explore this potential Catholic dogma in regards to Mary? I think your position seems correct from my perspective too.
 
I think we should be open to listening to all Christians too see what they really mean.
Nah. I am sticking to what I said. I am open to any Catholic explaining to me the concept and the term. I am not overly interested in learning about Catholic beliefs from non-Catholics. Call me crazy. Now if I wanted to learn about, say, Calvinism, that would be a different story.

God bless you
 
The King gave us the queen, not the Church.
I’m not sure if I follow. How is Mary our queen as Christians? And, why should I have a queen if Mary is part of the creation. In comparison, Jesus is our King who is God in the flesh. As Christians, our affection has to be for our Triune God first and foremost.
 
Nah. I am sticking to what I said. I am open to any Catholic explaining to me the concept and the term. I am not overly interested in learning about Catholic beliefs from non-Catholics. Call me crazy. Now if I wanted to learn about, say, Calvinism, that would be a different story.

God bless you
Let’s discuss something netural. What do you mean by being “in Christ”. My correct screen name should be “In 2nd Adam”. Please comment on this thread of being in Christ since you have referenced of being in Christ.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=384717
 
Therefore, if any one is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, behold, the new has come.* 2 Cor. 5:17

God bless
Yep… .let me add that those who are in Christ belong to one body, which Christ is the head, and in spiritual reality… there is no distinction between Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox, Anglicans, etc. 😉 Please check out the In Christ thread and comment on it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top