T
twf
Guest
Interesting. I could have sworn I read that they weren’t marred in the Church. Good to know.
Would any condemnation of sin not be a private matter between the person and their confessor, and thus not be the subject of any public announcement?Are you saying “welcomes them to diplomatic audiences with the Holy Father” or are you saying “welcomes those living in adultery to receive the sacrament without disavowing their mortal sin.?”
When a sin is public, notice of correction is also public. How many remarried Catholics will be caused to stumble if for Trump we pretend there is no adultery and publicly give communion? How many will think the Catholic church is all Republican politics? And why is a vice President held to a higher standard about not being allowed to receive communion publicly (Biden)?Would any condemnation of sin not be a private matter between the person and their confessor, and thus not be the subject of any public announcement?
In other words, we wouldn’t know.
According to these articles, Karen was married before (doesn’t say whether it was canonical form or not), then divorced, then married Mike in the Catholic Church.twf:![]()
Mike and Karen are lapsed (“repurposed” is possibly a better adjective) Catholics.I’m pretty sure his marriage is also irregular from a Catholic perspective. Though he obviously takes it very seriously with the whole “won’t have lunch with another woman” public stance he’s taken. That level of commitment is commendable even if his marriage is technically objectively invalid.
[EDITED] I just now looked it up, and apparently they were married in the Catholic Church. So it’s all good, nothing to see here, their marriage is valid. We just need to get them back to Catholic practice, be as evangelical as you want to be within the bounds of Catholic orthodoxy, just come back to the sacraments. Prayers for both of them.
What?The cop has to take off their uniform and the president can’t televise the event since there is no official uniform for the president to undress and swap over to civilian clothes.
If done on a weekly basis, that would create massive ongoing security problems in today’s environment.This is why the norm is for these people to attend a local church because, let’s face it, these places are on every corner of the US.
I didn’t know the White House had a Catholic chaplain. Good to know. As noted above, JFK’s scenario couldn’t happen today.I’ve met the Catholic White House Chaplain under President George W. Bush and he gave us (we were part of the discernment group at Catholic University in DC) an overview of the various role the Catholic Chaplaincy has had over the years. Mass and access to the White House varies from president to president. The chaplains do, however, have a strict rule that Mass is never to be said privately for an individual, even if that individual is the president. Apparently, JFK had a problem with this. When the chaplain said that he would say a public Mass on Sunday for everyone at the White House, JFK raised a stink because he wouldn’t be given preference over the other members of the staff at the Mass. Instead, he opted to go to the DC Catholic Cathedral where the Archbishop allowed a number of pews at the front of the Church to be cordoned off for security reasons every Sunday.
I know there is a school of thought that says “my sins, or anyone else’s, are none of anybody’s business”. But they are. Thomas Merton said that his sins were enough to cause the Second World War. If that were true, yep, I think the whole world would have definitely had a bone to pick with Thomas.John_Martin:![]()
Would any condemnation of sin not be a private matter between the person and their confessor, and thus not be the subject of any public announcement?Are you saying “welcomes them to diplomatic audiences with the Holy Father” or are you saying “welcomes those living in adultery to receive the sacrament without disavowing their mortal sin.?”
In other words, we wouldn’t know.
There’s nothing about “publicly giving communion” here, but if there were, that would only underscore what I just said.When a sin is public, notice of correction is also public. How many remarried Catholics will be caused to stumble if for Trump we pretend there is no adultery and publicly give communion?
Canon 915. He is a public sinner in the matter of abortion if anyone ever were. This is not a judgment on his soul or conscience, just an objective fact. What if Hitler had gone to Mass and presented himself for communion? Would we say “not to judge, it’s nobody’s business”? Not hardly! And Hitler was Catholic, a pretty bad one, but still Catholic.And why is a vice President held to a higher standard about not being allowed to receive communion publicly (Biden)?
The first time I attended Mass, I didn’t take it too seriously either, and it was little more than just “some random church service” to me. Mass pours out graces like an open fire hydrant gushes water. You just never know.Even if Melania is Catholic, I would be surprised if she’s practicing. Even if she happened to attend mass with Trump, I doubt it would do anything to influence him. I’m sure he’d be respectful, but it’s just some random church service to him, I don’t think he takes Christianity too seriously. You already have to be open to Christianity and exploring it seriously before there is any way you have a chance to convert by your own will
Yes. I was surprised too. Under some presidents (including George W Bush), the Chaplain became somewhat of an unofficial advisor on the effect of legislation and judicial rulings to the president. Both George Bush Sr. and Jr. would sometimes call the Chaplain in for a gauge on how proposed legislation would impact the Catholic population. Jr. actually began to call the Chaplain in for spiritual advice as well, despite not even being Catholic.I didn’t know the White House had a Catholic chaplain. Good to know. As noted above, JFK’s scenario couldn’t happen today.
This would give disciples of Paul Blanshard conniption fits, but it makes me very happy.HomeschoolDad:![]()
Yes. I was surprised too. Under some presidents (including George W Bush), the Chaplain became somewhat of an unofficial advisor on the effect of legislation and judicial rulings to the president. Both George Bush Sr. and Jr. would sometimes call the Chaplain in for a gauge on how proposed legislation would impact the Catholic population. Jr. actually began to call the Chaplain in for spiritual advice as well, despite not even being Catholic.I didn’t know the White House had a Catholic chaplain. Good to know. As noted above, JFK’s scenario couldn’t happen today.
Yes he is,He is a public sinner in the matter of abortion if anyone ever were.
I’m not clear what you are saying in this last sentence. We do not go to Mass so that other people will see us going, but it seems to me that he would want to be known as a practicing Catholic, and would not shy away from being seen in public at Mass. Back in those days, Catholics would have severely disapproved of a Catholic president not going to Mass, and would have been very edified to see him going. Actually, I thought he regularly attended St Stephen Martyr Church on Pennsylvania Avenue (a church I have attended myself).If that was JFK’s intent, then he would actually be more likely to attend the regular (at that time) Mass at the White House. The White House Mass continued under JFK’s presidency, even when he did not attend them. There had been an official Catholic Chaplain since FDR and the Masses were already a semi regular occurrence when JFK took office. If he was concerned about his public image as a Catholic, then he would not have publicly attended Mass every Sunday when he was in DC at the Catholic Cathedral and had an area of the Church specifically reserved for him and his family.
Ah, yes, the old “fear of a Catholic majority” thing, accompanied by the idea of “we want to fit in and be like everyone else, we want everyone else to like us, we’re moving out to the suburbs and we want our piece of the American Dream”. Truth is, if you read the Catholic social encyclicals, and delve a bit into Catholic thought, as a non-Catholic, you come to realize that if Catholics follow the Church’s teachings, yes, they are going to try to “restore all things in Christ” according to a Catholic vision of society, and if they were ever a majority… shudder… so JFK had to jump through hoops to convince a skeptical electorate that no, your worst fever dreams will never come true. He really needn’t have bothered (other than to say the things that were needed to get elected) — it wasn’t long until “someone slammed the oven door”, and everything the Catholic Church had built in this country fell like a cake, compared to its glory days after WWII and through the 1950s. A couple more generations, and… but it was not to be.The public concern over JFK being Catholic was the rumors that the Vatican was trying to manipulate JFK’s presidency. In the politics of the time, a president being “beholden” to the whims of the Pope through threat of excommunication was a somewhat widespread conspiracy theory among his opponents during his presidency. This was the public Catholic image I was referring to. He didn’t care if he was seen attending Mass on a regular basis, although this act was used as supposed “evidence” of his fealty to Rome. If he was concerned with these rumors, it would have been easier to just go to the White House Mass and hide his attendance from the public.
I checked it out on a map (and from memory) and SSM probably is just about the closest church, or at least not much farther away, maybe a block or two, than any other, and it’s a straight shot down Pennsylvania Avenue. It is also a more modern church in terms of construction, and possibly had architectural elements that made it easier for Secret Service to use. Hard to say.Not sure why he would go clear over to St. Stephen Martyr when many other churches were closer. Maybe it was for security reasons.