I urge you to look deeper if that’s how you feel.
The religions are clearly different, but many of the points that are brought up sensationaly by anti-LDS are actually Catholic or biblical in origin.
The young catechumen’s observation is profoundly correct, Todd. I find it most telling that you harpooned (of all who are here) i) a catechumen, and ii) a catechumen who is literally correct.
Notice that you i) brought up his “feelings,” then ii) said our two religions are in fact
different, then iii) insinutated that the LDS is actually “catholic” or “biblical in origin.”
Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding conflicting ideas simultaneously. The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance. They do this by changing their attitudes, beliefs, and actions.[2] Dissonance is also reduced by justifying, blaming, and denying. It is one of the most influential and extensively studied theories in social psychology.
Your statement directed at the catechumen is cognitive dissonance par excellence. You target feelings, which clouds reason, then openly assert our religions are different,
then finish by replacing Mormonism for Catholicism, by insinuating that Mormonism is somehow catholic or biblical. Your statement is brazenly contradictory. The Mormon church is not “biblical in origin,” it originates with Joseph Smith 1,800 years after the Catholic Church originated with Jesus ; furthermore, there is nothing “catholic” about Mormonism, without doing serious injustice to the word, for Mormonism is extremely
American, so much so even I as a Canadian was turned off from that aspect of it (before I even had a religion, mind you). Finally, it’s infamous racism, especially against blacks and native Americans (more 19th century American pick-ups, which tell its true origins) makes it utterly non-catholic (universal).
Mormonism is an exercise in cognitive dissonance, and that’s exactly why it’s so effective. They are masters at it.
Pax,
Tim