P
PaulDupre
Guest
Thank you, Crdl2Grv! I will go to sleep chuckling tonight!Telstar, you should totally make this your new signature.
“Telstar, ‘whore of all the earth’.”
Thank you, Crdl2Grv! I will go to sleep chuckling tonight!Telstar, you should totally make this your new signature.
“Telstar, ‘whore of all the earth’.”
Wow Paul, thank you for sharing that! Mormons keep that very quiet. Notice how tony888 has become mute.Actually, they believe that their “Heavenly Father” has many wives in heaven.
Bennett entered the seminiary right out of high school. He was hospitalized with severe depression shortly before he left the Church and became a Mormon. His own family history is sad. He writes that after being bombarded by missionaries with arguments and Mormon literature, he eventually came to be attracted by the easy salvation and the purported family values. Bennett left the Church knowing that he was going to join the Mormons, got married to a long-time friend, and they became Mormon at the same time. They moved to Salt Lake City where he taught Mormonism for a year and a half at two colleges and an LDS institute of religion, They were repulsed by what they came to recognize as a fraud, left Salt Lake City, and returned to the Church on their knees. The Church, of course, being the good Mother that she is, welcomed them home.If I were a Mormon, I would never post here.
And I have made my own points so please understand where I’m coming from.
So why would Mormons come here? They never seem to ask questions about us. I mean, not really. Wait, is it possible that they may get a convert or two?
After all, Isaiah Bennett, a Catholic priest became a Mormon. Of course, he left the church and got married and then became a Mormon. Or maybe there is another order about it. I don’t know but I have very little respect for a PRIEST who can leave the Church and go to a religion which has no foundation in the beginning with Christ. Really, did he not have a clue?
He spent a year or so, got the Temple recommend and then wrote a book. He kept the wife. And came back to the Church.
If I am being not very nice here, please forgive me. I have humility issues. (In that I am not as humble as often as I should be.)
I put no limitations on God whatsoever. That is why I believe in one God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, who is eternal (no beginning and no end), omniscient (all knowing, from eternity), omnipresent, (everywhere at one time), omnipotent (all powerful, above every creature in the universe, who made everything from nothing). He is not co-eternal with matter, or other gods, or any other being; one, all knowing, all present, all powerful, eternal God.Why do you put such limitations on God?
Your logic is a false strawman that may help you feel smug, but does not represent LDS theology.
Christ revealed to the world the true nature of God. Neither the Jews nor the Muslims believe in Jesus Christ and therefore do not believe what he has revealed. That is their problem, not ours. They are reading an incomplete story. I don’t know of anyone who is trying to meet the “common definition” of God with the Jews or the Muslims, other than the fact that we all believe in only one God. Even on this most basic of principals, the LDS depart from all three monotheistic religions.It sounds like you are describing a severe case of Cognitive Dissonance
You accept with Jews and Muslims that you do not meet their common definition, yet you turn around and tell yourself that you do meet it, when speaking amongst yourselfs or with LDS.
You are actually going to use the ECF’s to defend your position? Please give me one quote from the ECF’s that promotes a uniquely Mormon doctrine or belief.We do say we are Christian based on the common definitions found in the dictionary, and as the ECF would have seen christianity (before Nicea)
Yes, we are all shaking in our boots with fear.There are real and siginficant differences between the RCC and LDS, so I’m astounded that people here don’t focus on the real differences and instead must attack and deny where there is some overalap. I’m truely puzzled by this behavior. Is it driven by fear?
Where do I find the history of Bennett? It’s because of what I thought I knew that I would never buy the book. Since I doubted his sincerity I didn’t want to fill any pockets.Bennett entered the seminiary right out of high school. He was hospitalized with severe depression shortly before he left the Church and became a Mormon. His own family history is sad. He writes that after being bombarded by missionaries with arguments and Mormon literature, he eventually came to be attracted by the easy salvation and the purported family values. Bennett left the Church knowing that he was going to join the Mormons, got married to a long-time friend, and they became Mormon at the same time. They moved to Salt Lake City where he taught Mormonism for a year and a half at two colleges and an LDS institute of religion, They were repulsed by what they came to recognize as a fraud, left Salt Lake City, and returned to the Church on their knees. The Church, of course, being the good Mother that she is, welcomed them home.
It’s a sad story, and one that Bennett deeply regrets. But Karl Keating of Catholic Answers convinced him that he could do a huge service to the Church by writing about his experience. The result was Inside Mormonism, a book that reveals Mormon history, belief, and double-speak from the inside. It should convince Catholics and others of the fallacy of Mormonism. Every Christian should read it.
Jim Dandy
Hi, Miriam,If I were a Mormon, I would never post here.
And I have made my own points so please understand where I’m coming from.
So why would Mormons come here? They never seem to ask questions about us. I mean, not really. Wait, is it possible that they may get a convert or two?
After all, Isaiah Bennett, a Catholic priest became a Mormon. Of course, he left the church and got married and then became a Mormon. Or maybe there is another order about it. I don’t know but I have very little respect for a PRIEST who can leave the Church and go to a religion which has no foundation in the beginning with Christ. Really, did he not have a clue?
He spent a year or so, got the Temple recommend and then wrote a book. He kept the wife. And came back to the Church.
If I am being not very nice here, please forgive me. I have humility issues. (In that I am not as humble as often as I should be.)
Hi, Miriam of the beautiful name,Where do I find the history of Bennett? It’s because of what I thought I knew that I would never buy the book. Since I doubted his sincerity I didn’t want to fill any pockets.
I sincerely apologize and ask forgiveness for my nastiness.
Parker has mastered double-speak. Here you have a priest, Isaiah Bennett, who left the Church and became a Mormon and taught the faith for a year and a half in Salt Lake City, who was a “trophy” for the Mormons, and now, according to Parker, has "presented incorrect ‘facts’ " . . . which he can defend straight from the Bible (he means, not the Bible but his interpretation of it, and the LDS’s).I have posted here for a few reasons–so that a few discerning people could hopefully see a different perspective than what people such as Isaiah Bennett or a few other past members (whose self-sifting was a good thing for them personally) present as incorrect “facts”, which are “accepted” by so many other people who add it to their set of what corresponds with what they want to believe about people they otherwise know very little about, showing their human nature which is OK.
Also, finding that I could defend every point brought up, straight from the Bible (though not according to the one I was writing to), has helped me greatly in treasuring the Bible
JD,Parker has mastered double-speak. Here you have a priest, Isaiah Bennett, who left the Church and became a Mormon and taught the faith for a year and a half in Salt Lake City, who was a “trophy” for the Mormons, and now, according to Parker, has "presented incorrect ‘facts’ " . . . which he can defend straight from the Bible (he means, not the Bible but his interpretation of it, and the LDS’s).
Bennett didn’t need to misrepresent Mormonism, and he didn’t.
What facts presented in Bennett’s book do you claim are false?
Jim Dandy
Catholic-RCIA,Parker, i have two questions.
Catholics have been accused by the LDS of worshipping Mary and the Saints, yet I do not know any who understand their faith who would do this. For me it would be impossible to worship any other but God.
Christians worship Jesus as well as the Father through the Holy Spirit.
Do you Parker worship Jesus?
Can you place Him above all things?
ParkerD, we should pursue this in a separate thread. I would like to know the answer,but if we pursue it here, we’ll likely be told by the moderator that it’s off topic.JD,
I had never heard of Isaiah Bennett, so just because he may have considered himself a “trophy” doesn’t mean such was the case. As far as I and anyone I know are concerned, there are no “trophy” people who join the LDS church–it is a wrong concept.
I’ve read articles written by him on this website–not his books. The articles contain much that is untruthful, but go along the same lines as so much that is presented in this forum that I have attempted to refute time after time and they just keep coming up, so it seems to be a “lost cause” on this forum.
If you would like one example, let me know if you wish, although clearly it wastes both of our time.
Thank you Parker. Couple follow up questions.Catholic-RCIA,
I have answered about worshiping Jesus Christ time and again. The answer is yes.
The answer to your last question is that I do, and rejoice in understanding His guiding influence in my life and the lives of many, many people I love. I see and feel it every day of my life, which as you may know makes life very purposeful and joyful.
As far as Catholic worship, it is not really my business nor have I accused any of any of the things you mentioned.
JD,ParkerD, we should pursue this in a separate thread. I would like to know the answer,but if we pursue it here, we’ll likely be told by the moderator that it’s off topic.
The reason it’a “a lost cause on this forum” is that we state the truth about Mormon teachings, from Mormon sources, and you repeatedly deny it.
“Trophy” is my word applied to the obvious delight Mormons took in frequently asking Bennett and his wife to “give their testimony” (of their becoming Mormon). I’m calling attention.to his “untestimony,” written in his book Inside Mormonism.
Watch for the new thread, please.
Jim Dandy
Catholic-RCIA,Thank you Parker. Couple follow up questions.
Does your Church encourage worshipping Jesus as you do?
Can you show me this? Not just the fact that you have the name of Jesus on your buildings, or that you say the name of Jesus / Savior at the end of a prayer. But that your Church goes much deeper into a personal relatioship with Jesus. In speaking directly to Him, the worshipping of Him in daily life.
Do you also pray / speak to Jesus?
Does your Church encourage this?
Talk to Jesus directly in your day to day life as the Apostles did?
Does your Church encourage prayer to Jesus?
Can anything that the Mormon religion teaches really be doctrine? Since any of what they teach can be changed by new revelation, how can that be doctrine? True doctrine does not change, ever.Why the attitude we are sneaky? Either something is doctrine or it is not.
If it is not doctrine, then we may be discussing specualation about what has not been revealed.
I will be the first to admit LDS have speculated about the unknow, but speculation is not doctrine.