Jim, why are you so bitter against the LDS? I say that because your claims are ludicrous.
That’s your interpretation, Tony. I am not bitter. But I do defend the Catholic Church as best I can against the false claims of Mormonism, such as the so-called Great Apostasy and being called “the great and abominable church, which is the mother of abominations, whose foundation is the devil, that leads souls to hell, the whore of all the earth” in the Book of Mormon. Modern Mormons say, ‘Oh, the BOM doesn’t mean the
CATHOLIC Church.’ But that was previously Mormon doctrine, for sure. That’s what I mean about your doctrines changing. What Mormons are taught depends on how old they are. The Adam/God doctrine was taught by none other than Brigham Young, and was still being taught in the 1960’s (I don’t know when it was stopped) but it’s now rejected, along with many others, in an attempt to sanitize Mormonism and make it appear more Christian.
mrm.org/adam-god
The LDS make a strong attempt to catechize members on the teachings of the Church, and the Church uses standardized manuals to ensure all members are learning the right teachings. These manuals are clearly meant to teach correct doctrine, and except for a few errors, they do this well.
McConkie’s Mormon Doctrine used to be one of those manuals, but since May 2010 it has been repudiated.
*“Written in 1958, Mormon Doctrine has served as a reference book for members of the Church for over 50 years, but has recently gone out of vogue.” *(From an article I previously posted.)
I would love for you to back up your claim that LDS doctrine is a complete mess, that constantly changes.
I can’t back up a claim I didn’t make.
Please support this slander Or where you just attacking the concept of ongoing revelation?
Is the change in Mormon doctrine regarding polygamy
slander? I refer you to the1890 Woodruff Manifesto.
Is the change in Mormon doctrine regarding Blacks and the Mormon priesthood
slander? The ban on blacks holding the priesthood was reversed due to ‘revelation’ received by the prophet Spencer W. Kimball in 1978.
There are many former “doctrines” or “teachings” that are now denied. Heavenly Father’s intercourse with Mary resulting in the birth of Jesus on earth, still taught by Ezra Taft Benson (died 1994), for example.
I think the independent surveys support the LDS know their bible and doctrine better than the Catholics, as a group. It’s not a competiton, but I’m tired of your ego and attacks on the body of the faithful.
What independent survey? You know, do you not, that the New Testament consists of 27 of the Catholic Church’s own writings? That’s why the LDS Apostasy theory is so ludicrous. You got your Scriptures from an alleged “apostate” Church.
I have not claimed myself an expert on the CCC but I’ve noticed what it explicitly says, and asked you to justify your comments that conflict
This entire thread has dealt with the question of polytheism in Mormonism, which you and other continue to deny in spite of the evidence from Mormon sources.
You interpret the CCC to mean that the Catholic Church teaches the same thing as the Mormons regarding godhood for males. WRONG! St. Paul’s statement, “It is not I, but Christ who lives in me” is an example of Deification or Theosis, not that men become gods and rule over their own kingdom and have spirit children non-stop with their goddess wives (plural) forever, as Mormonism teaches. Please stop misrepresenting my Church’s doctrine!
. If your words were true, you would have ample official references (but you have supplied none)
Many posters have given ample evidence, and you deny it.
And yes, it is the concept of “ongoing revelation” I was referring to when I stated: QUOTE: In reality, there is no truth in Mormonism to be recorded. “Truth” means true forever, and Mormon doctrines are subject to change through ongoing revelation" END QUOTE. It’s more than a concept – we’ve seen it in action.
You don’t deny that “Lying in the Lord” or “milk before meat,” are Mormon principles, do you? Or, since you’re a new Mormon, maybe you haven’t been taught these yet. Just google them.
“Before becoming a prophet, Smith’s chosen profession relied on deception to earn a living. He assured clients that he could see underground treasure using a magic stone in the bottom of his hat and clients paid him to locate hidden gold using this method. He never did of course. Smith’s arrest, trial and conviction in Bainbridge, NY for fraud in 1826 documented his activity. He was found guilty of glass looking. The modern term for Smith would be a con artist. (Dan Vogel, Joseph Smith: The Making of a Prophet, 82-86),” quoted by Ken Clark, former Mormon teacher.
mormonthink.com/lying.htm
I sympathize. It must be a shock to learn these things about your new religion on an internet forum.
I bid you peace.
Jim Dandy