Is Mormonism Christian ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill_Pick
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I understood the attempt, failed as it was. It’s not irony, and it’s in very poor taste. The two sites are in no way comparable, so it’s not true. A few posts later, you condoned it, saying it was “ACCURATE… but not nice.” While neither the web site, nor the comparison were accurate depictions, I agree with you that it was not nice. It certainly lacked knowledge and was not charitable.
And neither was the original post, but I apologize for reacting in kind and not turning the other cheek as I should have.
 
Here are some that are good reading for you, and Catholics to make sure they are aware of the Mormon falsehoods and deceit:

Distinctive Beliefs of the Mormon Church
catholic.com/library/distinctive_beliefs_of_mormon.asp

Mormonism’s God(s)
catholic.com/thisrock/1992/9207fea2.asp

THE MORMON GOD: JUST ONE OF THE GUYS
catholic.com/thisrock/1997/9712fea2.asp

What You Need to Know About the Mormons
catholic.com/thisrock/1999/9905fea2.asp

Confronting the New Mormon Threat
catholic.com/projects_old/mormonism.asp

The Wacky World of Joseph Smith
And the un-Christianity of Mormon Theology
catholic.com/thisrock/2003/0305fea4.asp

INSIDE A MORMON TEMPLE
catholic.com/thisrock/1995/9506fea1.asp
Well I guess I should have responded a bit stronger after all. Nah.

These sites are reprehensible and reflect an effort to do exactly what you condemned me for. Even though I did it in a totally different spirit, and later apologized. Now who is acting Christian?

You would never ever find this kind of trash on a quasi-offical Mormon site. This is great evidence for the fact that we are in fact persecuted by the Catholic Church.
 
I didn’t know that Catholics thought that God was created.

We don’t. He is eternal. Remember Jesus saying “I AM”? He is the self-existent one. Spirits are eternal
One of the old tactics of Mormons is deceit to make their faith appear palatable (something it is not), so sorry, I can’t buy that Mormons actually believe that in the same way that we Catholics do.

“According to Mormon teaching, at one point in the eternities past, this man-become-God, or “Heavenly Father,” begat the spirit body of his first son. Together with his heavenly wife, the Father raised his son in the council of the gods.” …“Mormons now believe that Christ’s divinity is virtually equal to that of his Father’s. As we have seen, this is a compromised godhood: Jesus Christ merely joins the end of a long line of gods who have preceded him, an infinite “regression” of divine beings whose origin Mormons cannot explain. (Nor, for that matter, can they explain its end, as we will see when we discuss the doctrine of men becoming gods.)”
 
Well I guess I should have responded a bit stronger after all. Nah.

These sites are reprehensible and reflect an effort to do exactly what you condemned me for. Even though I did it in a totally different spirit, and later apologized. Now who is acting Christian?
Those come from one web site, which is the one you are currently on. There is nothing wrong with them. Certainly, Mormons don’t like them, but neither do they like the truth. I believe in the one Church that Christ established, so the Christian in this conversation could only be me. If you are really Mormon, then you are not Christian. It is very Christian to tell the truth. Mormons don’t tell the truth when they convey their faith system accurately.
 
Spirits are eternal”? I thought God (even according to mormonism) created our spirits?
Probably the most accurate way of putting it is that God organized our spirits, but each of us were distinct eternal intelligences. So it becomes a definitional issue of what is an “intelligence” and what is a spirit. God formed spirit bodies out of distinct intelligences.
 
mfbukowski,

Don’t you as a LDS believe God created Jesus’ spirit?

As in, "He is “our elder spirit-brother”?

By the way, Catholics do not believe ‘God was created’. But you already know this. 👍
I think I just answered this.
 
The point is, the logic works. The premises don’t.

What’s a potential thing? As opposed to an actual thing? You can’t argue with the logic, but the words don’t mean anything. Things don’t just pop in and out of existence like they’re potential one second and actual the next.

Iron ore is transformed into the kitchen sink. It didn’t just pop into existence from a design.

If there is any constant in the universe, it is change, not stasis.

The only reason we think unchanging things are “perfect” is because of the Greek language where “perfect” means “complete”

Heraclitus was a great philosopher but a poor communicator. If he had carried the day instead of Aristotle, the whole world would be different. If Aquinas had studied Heraclitus instead of Plato and Aristotle, Christianity might have stayed like Mormonism. It is fun to speculate.

Anyway, there is no point in trying to convince you or even talk. You are too locked into your pov. Nothing wrong with that-- you have constructed your reality and it works for you. I wish you well, you are obviously a smart person.
Potential and actual are common English words. I’m sorry for confusing you. I didn’t realize English wasn’t your native language.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top