I am not suggesting the man is doomed. I am suggesting there is a major misunderstanding on someone’s part. A priest telling a penitent that he is “binding him to is sins” is just not at all likely. What is more likely, but I really hate to speculate, is the priest tell the man “he is bound to his sins”. In other words the priest is not taking any action but determined in the confessional that the man is not truly penitent, ie he does not intend to quit some sin, and used words to that effect that were misunderstood.
But you are correct, sometimes people just do not understand a given priest or “do not connect” so seeing another priest might make sense. I read too much into your previous post, assuming you were suggesting there was a problem with the original priest. For that, I apologize.