C
ConstantineTG
Guest
I didn’t say they are passive, but that the understanding of the faith and teaching it seems built on a premise that the environment is secular. Western faith obviously developed around an environment where kings and emperors were Christians and would submit to the Pope’s moral authority. The problem with that setup now is that in today’s highly secular world, it seems toOk. One more time. Your simply arguing that orthodoxy is passive in its evangelization.
How could that be a better thing then the catholic position. That’s like Jonah saying “I’m not gomna go to nineveh and tell those people what to do because they don’t believe in you anyways Lord”
Did all the martyrs die because they practiced “live and let live”
The West seems marriage as a contract, a vow between a man and a woman. The East sees marriage as a larger mystery where the family, beginning with the man and the wife, is an ecclesiastical unit that participates in the life of God as this unit.“The Eastern understanding of marriage seems to be independent to what the secular government identifies as marriage”
For example how so and where? And what makes you think this isn’t true in the West?
That is the thing, it is either a Christian marriage or not. Which means other people can define marriage however they like, but that is completely different from what an Orthodox sees as a Christian marriage. The Catholic viewpoint seem undetached from the Secular viewpoint. The only difference between a natural marriage and a sacramental marriage is the fact that the sacramental marriage is between a baptized man and a woman and is witnessed by the Church.Could you elaborate on this view? It is not my understanding of Western or Eastern theology of marriage at all. The West has the concept of natural marriage. A natural marriage, which is between two unbaptized persons, or a baptized person and an unbaptized person, is considered a true marriage, but it is not a sacramental marriage. Western theology most certainly respects the marriage of two Jews, or athiests, or Hindus, etc, and considers them to be married, in the eyes of God and the State. The only case in which a true marriage is considered not to have occurred is when a Catholic marries outside the Church. All other marriages are considered either Sacramental (between two Christians) or Natural. Catholics must enter into marriage with the blessing of the church, either in the Catholic Church, or with a dispensation (by economy, if you will) from the Bishop to be married outside of the Church. Orthodox Christians must be married by the priest, to a baptized individual, in an Orthodox ceremony. It is my understanding that it is not considered a “true marriage” otherwise. I could be wrong on that, but I do know that they are not permitted to receive Holy Communion if they have not been married in an Orthodox ceremony.