Is Polygamy Next?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlemagne_III
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
frobert said:
Insulting? Projecting are we? (I know my grammar.)

Time to go, family calls. .

Basic grammar? Is the your best answer for evading my questions, faulty analogies, moving the goal posts?

As I said your, opps I mean, you’re consistent.
Click to expand...
It’s oops, BTW. 😃
 
AgnosticBoy said:
I agree 100%, especially on your reference to polygamy = one man and one woman separate marriages!
Click to expand...
I think this point is often ignored in the debates.
Excellent point about “progression”. The legal argument tends to be that our laws don’t work for polygamy, therefore polygamy is wrong and should be banned… as if it is impossible or wrong for lawmakers to figure out new laws.
Click to expand...
If polygamy is not legalized, it will be because of practical reasons, such as the people desiring it being a quiet and ignored minority by the powers-that-be (because, although fragmented, our culture is still largely Christian, and most people, I think, naturally only wish for one spouse, although there probably will be a rise in adultery and “open marriages:” they only want one spouse, but also like some flings to the side too 😦 ), or taxing and financial reasons (because in America, although sex speaks loudly, money always speaks louder), not because of any in principle reasons.

Christi pax.
 
And just to be clear: I never ridicule someone for bad grammar or poor spelling if he is making a point in earnest.

But when the bad grammar/spelling is contained in an insult, then it’s fair game.
It’s deserved and earned.
 
Legalized polygamy would just increase weird sexual practices. The guys that acquired many wives would be leaving a bunch of guys who could never get any women. So they would probably turn to other guys, adultery, or something worse to get sexually gratified.
 
CHRISTINE77 said:
Legalized polygamy would just increase weird sexual practices. The guys that acquired many wives would be leaving a bunch of guys who could never get any women. So they would probably turn to other guys, adultery, or something worse to get sexually gratified.
Click to expand...
Or, they could become priests and monks 😉

Christi pax.
 
Lucretius said:
Or, they could become priests and monks 😉

Christi pax.
Click to expand...
Celibacy is always a good option, but most do not choose it.

In any case, a polygamous society is much like a herd of non-predatory animals. One male dominates the gene pool.

I could actually see this happening, since so many gay men are not contributing to the next generation.
 
PRmerger said:
And just to be clear: I never ridicule someone for bad grammar or poor spelling if he is making a point in earnest.

But when the bad grammar/spelling is contained in an insult, then it’s fair game.
It’s deserved and earned.
Click to expand...
Sorry sis, you knew I was dyslexic and now you are questioning my reasons for taking part in the discussion, sounds like your are projecting again.

If you look back, you engaged me on this thread and then evaded all my questions, and went off topic which is been your consistent modus operandi. If pointing out your faulty analogy is an insult then I plead guilty. If you felt any insulted it was simply from me simply mirroring. If you felt any insults it was simply from me mirroring you.

Sometime in the past you said I had the (dubious) honor of being ignored by you, if you believe I am insulting you perhaps its time to honor me once again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top